Orchard Road, Singapore (Photo by Simon Poon from Shutterstock.com).

On Wednesday (21 August), a mother-daughter duo – who went on a shoplifting spree in 2017 – were sentenced to 10 days’ jail for their crime.
Fong Leok Moy, 68, and her daughter Wong Phuay Yee, 41, stole items like Havaianas slippers, Victoria’s Secret underwear and Cotton On garments from Wisma Atria, Ngee Ann City and Mandarin.
Both of them pleaded guilty to three counts of theft, with another seven taken into consideration.
It is said in the court that the two women were jobless when they committed the crime.
State Prosecuting Officer M Mariyappan said that the duo left their house on 22 October 2017 at about 3pm with the intention to go to Orchard Road for a shopping spree. But, since they didn’t have any money with them, they took the drastic step to steal things instead.
Unfortunately, their actions were short-lived as a sales assistant at the FitFlop store in Wisma Atria recognised them as they entered his shop a week earlier (15 October) and made off with two pairs of footwear valuing nearly S$300.
As such, the man decided to follow the pair and gave the cops a call at about 5.10pm. When the police checked the women, they found many items and the duo admitted in stealing them from different shops in the Orchard Road area.
Some of the items they stole include two pairs of Havaianas slippers worth S$109.80, three pairs of Cotton On shorts amounting to S$89.98, as well as 24 pieces of Victoria’s Secret seamless panties and a sports bra worth S$491 in total.
Besides that, they also took a S$35.20 L’occitane soap bar, two fruit peelers worth S$26, and S$40 scented candles from Bath & Body Works.
The prosecution noted that all the stolen goods were returned to the respective shops and requested for two weeks’ jail for each women. This is because the pair had previously been convicted of theft in May 2016 and “clearly did not learn” from it.

Request for mercy by defence lawyer

Defence lawyer TM Sinnadurai requested the judge to temper justice with mercy, noting that his clients committed the crime only on two separate occasions and had pleaded guilty soonest possible.
He pleaded for his clients to each be sentenced to two days’ jail and a fine of $6,000.
If that’s not all, the lawyer also stated that a medical report indicates that the mother suffers from depression and had endured some difficulty in her family life.
As for the daughter, she is the sole breadwinner in the family as both her parents are not working, he added.
However, District Judge Eddy Tham mentioned that the pair failed to realise the seriousness of their actions after previously receiving day reporting orders for theft.
“Unfortunately they did not cherish that (chance) and have gone on to commit not one but 10 different offences,” the judge said.
For each count of theft, they could have been jailed for seven years, fined or both.
Upon reading this news, many netizens slammed the pair, especially the mother for setting a bad example to her daughter. Writing on CNA’s Facebook page, they also added that not having money or depression are not reasons for anyone to steal. Kimberley Zachary said that it’s not right to “equate mental health to crime spree” as “having depression does not make one indulge in immoral activities”.

Others called for a harsher sentence as 10 days jail term is not sufficient for them. This is because it’s obvious the duo are not remorseful for their previous actions as they repeated the crime again.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】人民之声未受邀参与电视辩论 林鼎揶揄行动党害怕威胁

新传媒在今晚(1日)举办大选辩论会,受邀对象除了人民行动党,还有在野党如新加坡前进党、工人党和新加坡民主党。 然而,人民之声党领袖林鼎,不满该党被排除在外,也推断该党未受邀,可能是该党成为行动党的最大威胁之一。 “新传媒不邀请人民之声参加辩论!可耻!这也证明我们一直所说的,我们已然成为人民行动党最大的威胁。“ 除了写下控诉,林鼎也拍下视频质问,其他参选候选人人数最多的在野党都受邀参加,而人民之声(10人)与民主党(11人)仅差一人,为何不能参加辩论。 “新传媒邀请四个政党进行这场辩论,当然除了人民行动党,还有三个参选人数最多的在野党如前进党24人、工人党20人、和民主党11人,然而,人民之声却被排除在外,尽管仅和民主党差一人。” 他也表示,人民之声当初是为了尊重在野党的原则,避免三角战,才会放弃一些选区,导致参选人数变少,但却并不知道会因此失去辩论的机会。 “如果当初得知结果如此,人民之声一定加派人力,参选更多选区。” 他也坦言,为了遵守在野党原则,放弃许多选区,让许多支持者和准候选人失望,不过他也承诺将在下一次大选卯足全力,让人民之声能够参加大选辩论。 林鼎解释,新传媒不希望人民之声能够参与此次辩论的原因,可能是因为想试图让辩论会变得不具威胁,而他此前却多次挑战人民行动党。 “当然,某媒体不想要让我参加辩论,你可以回顾过往的记录,在过去几年,我多次挑战人民行动党的部长们,可是他们却不敢回应我。” 他说,“他们当然想要邀请不具威胁性的政党,他们想要和平无争议的辩论会,但却无法直戳重点,他们想要移除为人民发声的政党,即指人民之声。” 林鼎直指,尽管无法参加,但他也不会放过质问的机会,他将会观看整场辩论会,并拍摄视频发表意见。…

港民为“连侬墙”闹冲突 青年吃中年汉13拳

香港“连侬墙”似乎成了“反送中”抗争的延续,反送中支持者透过张贴MEMO在一些地铁、行人隧道走廊或公共地区的墙上,留言为支持者加油打气。 “连侬墙”原指在1980年,披头四约翰连侬被枪杀后,有人在杰克首都布拉格一幅墙画上约翰连侬肖像和创作歌词。之后就有人开始效法,在墙上留下约翰连侬词作。 2014年雨伞革命期间,在香港政府总部出现的壁报墙,示威者用MEMO留言普选诉求。 而在近期反逃犯条例运动期间,香港各处也出现类似“连侬墙”,让民众表达诉求和声援。这也是另一种街头抗争的形式。 不过并不是所有港民都支持“连侬墙”,也有出现建制派支持者批评墙壁贴MEMO“破坏市容”,也藉此把示威扰民、对于示威诉求的不满,透过撕毁连侬墙发泄。期间也出现民众互骂、对峙,甚至引起警员介入干涉的情况发生。 而在昨晚于九龙湾,也出现一名中年男子企图破坏“连侬墙”,其中一名青年欲阻止他,遭中年汉打多达13拳,另有一名65虽老翁也被他袭击。 中年男被逮捕 根据网民分享视频,该中年男欲撕下墙上MEMO,一些青年就尝试与之理论。但此后中年男忽然挥拳打一名蓝衣青年,更有数拳直击青年头部,青年更一度倒地。 期间,中年男还责骂“搞什么革命?”“后生仔(青年人)不是这样做事情的”,并扯下墙上张贴的MEMO。间中也与其他青年推撞,中年男指责是青年们围堵阻拦他在先。尽管有民众喝止,中年男仍数度攻击青年。 至于蓝衣青年全程未还手,嘴部和手部受伤。最后警方来到了解情况,中年男因涉及身体伤害罪逮捕。 “连侬墙”成诉求管道 目前“连侬墙”也成了港亲建制派和泛民派的拉锯战,不时会有居民试图撕毁“连侬墙”、在街上和泛民支持者理论。但“连侬墙”乃是一些港民自发的行动,先是有人在墙上张贴彩色MEMO,之后就有其他人追随。事实上,不论何种立场,都可在“连侬墙”留言发泄。…

The buck stops with Transport Minister Khaw Boon Wan, says Lim Tean on the train collision which caused 25 over injuries

Lawyer and political activist, Lim Tean has posted a video of him speaking…

Temasek loses close to S$2B less than 1 yr after investing in Bayer while 3rd Roundup lawsuit proceeds

Two weeks ago (19 Mar), a federal jury in San Francisco found…