Author Sudhir Vadaketh is making his foray into the world of videos. Announcing on his website, Sudhirtv.com, that he will be experimenting with videos now – he’s published two videos on his Facebook page so far, discussing the issue of race in Singapore – Mr Vadaketh said that while writing remains his first love, his experimentation with videos will be part of his own “professional growth, reskilling, continuing media education” as he hopes to start his own media business.
Mr Vadaketh singled out three video personalities that who became the catalyst for him to start down this new part: Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam, Singaporean influencer Michelle Chong, and Isreali-Palestinian vlogger Nuseir Yassin aka Nas Daily.
Mr Vadaketh says these three individuals have “contributed to an increasingly ideologically-biased video landscape”.
Starting with the Law Minister, he explains, “Shanmugam is a constant video presence on big issues, for instance commenting on Preeti and Subhas. I am told, among other things, that those “interviews” are often scripted, staged, and re-shot if he doesn’t like something. There is no pushback. Nobody would dare, for example, ask him whether the government made a mistake in publishing the Brownface ad, something journalists in any other developed country would feel comfortable doing.”

Mr Vadaketh stresses that this isn’t journalism or authentic reporting, describing it as ‘Shanmugam TV’, and lamenting that he’s not sure viewers understand thing.
As for Michelle Chong and Nuseir Yassin, Mr Vadaketh says that while he likes their style and some of their works, they have “knowingly or not become part of the PAP’s band of useful idiots”. Specifically, he notes Michelle Chong’s works for the government, which he agrees is ‘great’ but he also expressed shocked at her video interview of Shanmugam about the fake news law.
“The interplay between truth and fiction is a key tenet of any art form. Imagine my surprise, then, that a Singaporean artist would willingly help politicians take away that power,” he said.
He added, “I’ve met Michelle Chong once, briefly, she seems like a lovely person, but I’ve also been told that she’ll say/perform anything for money—which is troubling for all sorts of reasons.”
Mr Vadaketh also noted that her video didn’t mention that it was sponsored by the government, an omission which he asserts is unethical. “But this appears to be the way of the influencer world, take money and keep quiet about it.”
Turning his attention Nas Daily, Mr Vadaketh notes that the videos are ‘gross oversimplification of complicated problems’ which he believes do a disservice to the world.
“His superficial commentary on Singapore is proof that one can’t parachute into a place and understand it. There are a million critiques to choose from, but I’ll give you just one: it is absurd for a Muslim-Arab to call Singapore, a country with institutional discrimination against Muslims, an “almost perfect country”. But that’s what happens when you observe the veneer of multiculturalism and are wilfully ignorant about real problems,” said the author.
However, Mr Vadaketh conceded that Mr Yassin’s move to Singapore is great for the country.
Still, Ms Chong and Mr Yassin’s dependence on government funding hinders their ability to act and speak freely, Mr Vadaketh pointed out.
“And that is why I worry that the video world is increasingly ideologically-biased. Unlike say the written word, for which Singaporeans can now access a whole range of views online,” he lamented.

First steps into video

Mr Vadaketh then went on to address a few mistakes he’s spotted in his first couple of videos including the choices in background music, delivery, and typos in the subtitles as well as the race-related jokes he made in his post-credit scene and the lack of balance when he didn’t include at least one opposition politician in his criticisms.
On the last point, Mr Vadaketh emphasises that he is not affiliated to any party and has in the part openly criticised both the PAP and WP. He reiterates that his political preferences remain the same.

“My political preference has been unchanged for the past ten years: happy with the PAP in power, but it needs to be cut down to size, we need a lot more opposition parliamentarians. We must deny the PAP its two-thirds majority because it keeps recklessly toying with our sacred constitution (like recently with the reserved presidency),” he clarified.
As such, he pointed out that while he called out several PAP politicians in his video, he made the mistake of not including even one opposition politician. “There is an obvious reason for this—the PAP ones have a much bigger responsibility to deal with all these issues,” said Mr Vadaketh but also conceded that he could have included a comment to better reflect his non-partisanship.

What’s next for video and Vadaketh?

While this is an avenue he is keen on experimenting with, Mr Vadaketh specified that he’s not sure it would be a regular thing as it is “terribly nerve-wracking and a big distraction from writing.”
However, he adds, “If it ever does become so, I would love to try and emulate The Daily Show or Patriot Act, knowing of course that I’ll never ever be half as good as Hasan or the rest. But even that might be good enough for Singapore/South-east Asia.”
Mr Vadaketh notes he would want to tackle a range of issues from politics to technology, food, sports and more.
To that end, Mr Vadaketh says he’s having discussions about building a video team and tapping into funding sources such as the crowd-funding membership platform Patreon.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Channel Newsasia bars Dr Chee – again

Andrew Loh / When Channel Newsasia (CNA), the local television news channel…

Busker at woodlands MRT purportedly harassed by SMRT staff

Yesterday, TOC shared on our facebook about a post by Ms Zarina…

Lawyer M Ravi files case in High Court on behalf of husband seeking to use his CPF savings to fund his cancer-stricken wife’s medical treatment

International human rights lawyer M Ravi took to his Facebook page on…

【选举】指武吉巴督工地缺乏防范措施 徐顺全:穆仁理在哪里?

新加坡民主党秘书长徐顺全博士日前指出,武吉巴督湿巴刹附近的建筑工地,未做任何防范措施,今天他重游旧地时,发现当地已设置路障和围栏,防止民众接近。 徐顺全今天(6月27日)在脸书发帖,分享有关事件,并对当局所采取的行动感到满意。 帖文中,他指出四天前发现该区154栋的建筑工地,并没有设置防止人们进入的路障,而该处又处于武吉巴督最拥挤地区内,附近还有湿巴刹和小贩中心,因此感到担忧。 据帖文中附上的照片中,可见该建筑工地周围有防水布料遮盖,但是布料已经破破烂烂,且无法阻止民众踏入工地,地上也铺满了石头。另一张图片中,只见有关的工地已经被红白网围起来,并设置了黄色路障,破烂的蓝色布料也已经被堆放在一旁,显得非常干净整齐。 “我四天前在武吉巴督拍下这张照片,可见现场一片凌乱;所幸今早回到现场,至少设置了安全警戒线。” 强调国会议员是全职工作 他指出,该工地并非一个隐蔽角落,是当地人潮最拥挤的地点之一,而出现有关情况,也不见武吉巴督议员穆仁理(Murali Pillai)出现或提及。因此,他认为单选区需要拥有自己的全职议员,否则的话,拥有其他工作在身的议员,无法全心全意为支持他的选民服务。 “这就是我说的,议员是全职工作。若你是兼职议员,你将所有时间花在个人日常工作上,无法做到100巴仙付出。” “人们透过选举让你来经营这个地区,你每月收到1万6000元薪金,工作却外包给代管人,然后由人民付费。请问这是什么逻辑。” 他补充道,身为国会议员,为选民服务是他的职责,是全职。 “随着赋予你的责任,你需要运营市议会、照顾选区,尤其关注居民的福祉和安全,在国会中代表他们发言,建立强大的社区并保护弱势群体,这是一份全职。这也是若成为武吉巴督国会议员后,需要执行的工作。”…