Soh Rui Yong at the Taiwan Open (Image from Soh Rui Yong / Facebook)

Two-time marathon champion Soh Rui Yong is back in the limelight, and this time due to his tiff with Singapore Athletics (SA) after the organisation blocked him from posting on its social media platforms.
Their disagreement came after the Singapore National Olympic Council (SNOC) announced in a media statement on 1 August (Thursday) that the two-time marathon champion Soh Rui Yong was not selected to be part of the team representing Singapore at the SEA Games in the Philippines, happening later in the year.
The 27-year-old marathoner was not listed by SNOC as part of the 858 athletes who will be representing Singapore in 49 sports at the Games from 30 November to 11 December.
This is because he “has displayed conduct that falls short of the standards of attitude and behaviour that the SNOC expects of and holds its athletes to considering that they are held up and seen as representatives of the country and as examples to our sporting youth,” SNOC explained.
Following his removal from the Singapore’s contingent, SA also decided not to appeal SNOC’s decision.
It was reported in TODAY that SA’s executive director Syed Abdul Malik Aljunied informed that Mr Soh was “temporarily” blocked from the association’s social media platforms, including WhatsApp chat groups, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. This is done to stop him from posting on them because his posts are deemed to have negative influence.
“(His) posts were very negative and we are concerned about the effect of his posts on the fraternity as a whole. What we would really like to do is to encourage positive postings regarding athletics. We should be celebrating the fact that 20 athletes were selected for the SEA Games,” Mr Malik said.
He added that Mr Soh would be blocked until SA talks to him about it and “agree on certain principles”.
On Monday (5 August), the marathoner took to his Facebook to inform that Mr Malik and the SA management had blocked him on social media platforms via a “junior staff”, instead of reaching out to him.
“When an athlete disagrees with you, block them on WhatsApp and all social media platforms with no reason given rather than sending him an email/ text/ calling him, communicating and working it out together,” Mr Soh wrote in the post.

As a reply to what the athlete wrote, Mr Malik said, “SA is ever ready to engage with him in a mutually respectful dialogue to put a closure to this issue and to move on”.
He added that the association is making arrangements to meet Mr Soh soonest possible. He also said that Mr Soh had previously turned down SA’s request to meet on 20 June, which was the last time the association had reached out to the national marathoner.
In the Facebook post, Mr Soh also included screenshots of two WhatsApp chats. The first appears to show a conversation between the athlete and an unidentified person, with the latter informing that he was ordered to remove and block Mr Soh from all of SA’s social media accounts.
The second screenshot showed that Mr Soh had been removed from a WhatsApp Group called “SAA-Closed”.
In response to Mr Soh’s claim that a “junior staff” was assigned to inform him that he was blocked from all social media accounts, Mr Malik said that he had requested SA’s chief information officer (not a junior employee) to do so, as he had to handle other roles and responsibilities.
Mr Malik explained, “I’m really busy trying to assist 20 athletes to prepare for the SEA Games. I’m covering several roles at SA, including the duties of technical director, high performance manager and executive director. Serving the athletes who have qualified for the SEA Games and supporting their coaches is my immediate priority.”
Upon reading this news, many netizens penned their support towards Mr Soh on the Facebook pages of TODAY and ST. They said that the move taken by SA is “unprofessional, irresponsible and politicking” because their action of banning Mr Soh is deemed as a “classical example of being punished by high level authority for being outspoken and honest”. Some even pointed out that Singapore’s sports can never excel because the people in charge is only interested in controlling their athletes, instead of supporting them.

Others slammed the authority for bringing politics into sports since they don’t accept criticism given by others and only stand by ‘yes’ man athletes. A few pointed out that the country is losing its genuine prospect of securing a gold medal at the SEA Games, solely due to the authority’s ego.


If that is not all, a bunch of online commenters also said that some of the talented sportsperson like Serena Williams and John McEnroe were never an easy bunch to handle, indicating Mr Soh as someone like them. As such, they said that Mr Soh should take his ability and talent elsewhere so he can succeed, be appreciated and create a name for himself, without the need to conform to the authorities’ rules in Singapore.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

中国籍女子不满判决 对法官出言不逊被判入狱三周

因不满家事法庭所判的结果,一名女子出言羞辱并威胁地方法官,被地方法院判入狱三周。 据《雅虎新闻》报道指出,该名女子为37岁中国籍女子张红红(译音),获得新加坡永久居留权,当时由于不满意离婚诉讼的结果,因此出言侮辱法官,称他为“婊子”,并威胁会打法官。 法官予以女子有条件的严厉警告,但随后在不到一年期间,再次侮辱法官,指责法官“品行愚蠢”,以及称法官与前夫有“勾结”。 上周五(27日),地方法院指控她涉嫌《防止骚扰法》,她承认相关罪行,因此获判三周监禁。 此外,她也涉嫌另一项对公务员出言不逊的指控,正在审判中。 案发经过 事发当时,女子与她的42岁新加坡籍前夫正在进行离婚诉讼,而且进行审判的是另有其人,并非受害者本身。 2017年8月25日,受害者中途接手案件,而且由受害者宣读有关婚姻财产分割、赡养费与孩子的审判。然而,女子对其结果并不满意 2017年11月,女子再次上诉,要求法官改变审判结果,法官分别在12月11日与22日召开聆讯。 据悉,女子对于前夫没有支付赡养费感到相当沮丧,认为家事法院并没有给予她足够的协助,感到愤怒。 2017年12月15日,女子在网上递交传票申请,并附上了一份宣誓书,控诉离最终判决已经超过一年,但仍未见前夫支付孩子的学费。 她也在宣誓书上表示,若家事法院未能在22日当天为她解决,她将会破坏法院以及殴打审判法官(即指受害者),并斥责受害者为婊子。…

TOC Reader: Keep religious values and decorum of Thaipusam

The following is a letter sent to TOC by one of our…

Singaporeans seen flooding IKEA over the weekend before the closure of businesses for "circuit breaking"

On 3 April, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced the closure of…

郑恩里加入公积金论战 称国民更长寿应继续工作遭网民挞伐

中央公积金议题闹得沸沸扬扬,前官委议员郑恩里也加入辩论战围,但他认为现代人比先辈活得更健康、更长寿,应该要鼓励国人工作更久些。 “假设人们可以活到90岁,那么退休年龄应订在70岁或75岁,才能确保公积金储蓄够用。” 他认为,大部分人不应预期62岁退休,未来30年就靠储蓄过活,“这不实际”。 他指出,国人寿命越来越长,但是仍期望像上一代人一样的退休年龄,这是不可能的。 他说,在一些欧洲福利国,保障人民可以在60岁退休,他们到离世前都能领取退休金。但随着人的寿命边长,这意味着国家要承担三分之一无工作人口的生活负担。 不过他未明确指出究竟是哪一个欧洲国家,因为个别国家国情和政策都有不同。 “我们的领导人要有勇气告诉国人,随着人们越来越长寿,要在62岁退休和65岁领公积金,会变得越来越困难。” 不过,郑恩里的论述随即迎来网民挞伐。英语时事网站《母舰》报导了郑恩里的观点,一些网民对此在脸书留言回应,有者提到固然平均寿命延长了,但是也不能忽视,有许多国人过了50、60岁,许多毛病就找上门了。这时候真得很需要公积金的储蓄来应付,才能让他们免于对于医疗病痛的担忧。 OC Yeo提到,如果要让民众投票选择的话,可能大部分会同意让自己的有生之年过上有素质的生活。 Sivadas Krishnan:月薪两三千的人或许有能力把公积金放着,到100岁提出都没问题。但问题是更多人面对的是生活挑战、要养儿育女。公积金是我们的自己的储蓄,请尊重我们的选择,相信你的子民。…