In response to a question about government spending on scholarships and tuition grants for foreign students, Minister of Education Mr Ong Ye Kung said, “The core objective of our education system is to serve the needs of Singaporeans and no Singaporean is ever displaced from an institute of Higher Learning (IHL) because of international students.”
However, using the National University of Singapore (NUS) as an example, we can see that from its website that it clearly states limited vacancies in the institute due to facilities and student-to-faculty ratio for each academic year.
The website says:
“All undergraduate courses in NUS have limited vacancies. This ensures that we have sufficient facilities to support our students and maintain an optimal student-to-faculty ratio for effective teaching.”

The NUS website also provides a breakdown of the number of male and female undergraduate and postgraduate students in each academic year by course, but does not specify a breakdown of the international-local student ratio.
But if we take a look at the data on the Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) website, QS notes that 7,645 out of 30,049 students in NUS are international students. Now, NUS has not disputed the figures stated by QS, since the university spokesperson was quoted in June saying that the QS ranking shows that the effort the institute has made in research and education is being highlighted.
Even so, when we look at the total number of students in NUS for the 2018/2019 academic year, it is a little higher than the QS figure, at about 39,923 students. Specifically, NUS say they have 30,093 undergraduates and 10793 post graduate students. Now, based on the slight difference in the total number of students noted by QS and NUS, we can estimate that NUS’s actual number of international students might be a little higher than QS’s figure.
All this to say, there are a limited number of spots in NUS with about 25% (calculated using figures from QS) going to international students. This ratio is similar to the ratio of international students to local students recorded by QS in Nanyang Technological University and Singapore Management University.
Given that we know there are a fixed number of spots in universities like NUS due to limited facilities, we can safely say that with each international student being enrolled as a student, a local student is deprived of his or her chance to obtain a degree from the local universities.
In the same Parliamentary session, Mr Ong also noted that the international students hoping to attend universities in Singapore are subject to a higher standard of admissions. He said, “In fact the process is that you apply to attend the university, you must meet a standard which is a higher one than for locals.”
But when we look at the NUS qualification standards for local and international students, we see that isn’t always the case.
For a fair comparison, we’ll take a look at the admission requirements for an international student with A Level qualification compared to that of a Singapore student with Singapore-Cambridge GCE A Level. We’re comparing these as A Levels are a recognised international qualification.
For international students applying to NUS, they need ‘a good pass in at least 3 A Level subjects’. Apart from that, they do not need SAT Subject Tests, English qualifications such as IELTS, or university entrance examinations.
On the other hand, local students need good results in three A Level subjects, Knowledge Inquiry (KI) or General Paper (GP), an A Level project work and meet the mother tongue language (MTLL) requirement (a minimum grade of O for the MTLL paper).

So as you can see, a Singapore student has to jump through more hoops to qualify for a spot in NUS compared to an international student. Not only are they competing for limited spots with Singaporeans, they have to do more to prove themselves to the universities.
Therefore, how can the minister say that Singaporean students are not deprived of a space in local universities by international students who receive scholarships or tuition grants?

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

HDB – Shorter loans better?

Leong Sze Hian I refer to the article “Length of loan is…

脚车与罗厘争道案:罗厘阿叔被判监禁7周、罚款500元、禁驾驶两年

58岁“罗厘阿叔” 张胜仲被判监禁7周,罚款500元并禁止驾驶两年,但被告打算对判决提出上诉。 2018年12月22日,当时58岁的张胜仲,和35岁的英国籍脚车骑士张豪宇,在巴西立第三通道和巴西立坡交界处发生冲突,两人在事后皆被控上庭。此外,张胜仲也被控于24小时内未向警方报案。 然而张胜仲面对的控状,于去年三月份,遭控方将从原本的“疏忽行为”修改为更严重的“鲁莽驾驶”,指控他突然左转罗厘并撞上脚车司机,导致对方自脚车上摔下,倒在草坪上。当时张胜仲也表示不认罪,坚称自己没触碰到脚踏车。 检方也将被告以前的罪行一并列出如意图伤害罪、非礼罪,并自2000年以来,他也相继犯下超速、粗心驾驶、闯红灯等罪行。 基于被告所犯下的罪行,法官则认为不能同意辩方的说法,但也表示不足以成为蓄意和挑衅的行为,因此将会给予较低的刑罚,也将保释金从1000元提高至6000元。 张胜仲打算上诉 询及判决,罗厘阿叔的辩护律师则表示,当事人打算对判决结果提出上诉。 骑士张豪宇此前承认两项控状:用右手将罗厘左侧镜敲掉的恶作剧控状,导致15元损坏;以及未在车道最左边骑脚车,触犯交通法令。他在今年4月被罚款2800元。

【武汉冠状病毒】马国新增117确诊 累计病例逼近八百大关

马国卫生部阿汉峇峇今日(18日)发文告,指马来西亚武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)新增确诊病例117例,使得该国累计病例达790例。 今日新增病例中有80例,都与在吉隆坡大城堡举行的传教士集会有关联。 上述宗教活动在上月27日至3月1日举行,多达1万6000人出席,其中有1万4500名都是马国人。 不过,马国今日也有11名患者出院,累计治愈病例60起。还有15名患者需在加护病房接受治疗,使用呼吸辅助器。目前该国已有两起死亡病例。 警队也沦陷 与此同时,马来西亚警队也出现首宗确诊病例,使得至少51名警员和家眷需居家隔离。 根据马国《东方日报》报导,马国卫生总监诺希山则警告,马国可能出现第三波更严重的疫情,为此叮嘱民众必须留在家中远离人群。 “我们只有很小的机会来斩断新冠肺炎的传染网络。负起自己应尽的责任来帮助卫生部,因为每个人都有责任采取所有步骤来保护自己和家人。” 目前,马国于18日至31日,全国实施限制行动令,马国民众不得出国,也不准外国游客入境。

China’s President warns public of a “grim” fight against coronavirus

Yesterday, Chinese President Xi Jinping, appeared in public after two weeks and…