An advertisement created for epaysg.com, an e-payment website, was recently released featuring Mediacorp actor and DJ Dennis Chew impersonating different races.
In the advertisement, one can see Chew dressed up as different races in Singapore such as a Malay woman in a headscarf as well as an Indian man with darkened skin. He also portrayed the role of a Chinese woman in a pink jacket and a Chinese man with a moustache in the advertisement.

As expected, the ad did not go down too well with the public, with many criticising the need to use one person to play different roles instead of hiring people of the actual races to play the characters.
In response to the ad, Singaporean influencer and comedian Preeti Nair, famously known as Preetipls, along with her brother, rapper Subhas Nair, released a rap video calling out epaysg.com for being racist on Facebook and YouTube on Monday (29 June).
The video titled “K. Muthusamy” contains offensive content. In the video, the siblings can be seen repeatedly uttering “Chinese people always out here f***king it up”, while condemning Chinese Singaporeans who they claim are racist and exploit minorities for money.
On the other hand, Subhas was also dressed similarly to the brown-toned look by Chew in the original advertisement.
Some of the questions raised in the video include “How can a man wear brown and wear a tudung? Two wrongs don’t make a right” highlighting how it is not right for Chew to act as a Malay woman and an Indian man, as well as C.M.I.O which originally stands for Chinese, Malay, Indian and others, has now changed to “Cancel minority is ok!”.
The video also said that this is not the first time such an incident has happened as a previous Deepavali advertisement had a Chinese dressed up as a Sikh man.
But at the end of the video, as a disclaimer, Preeti said that “not all Chinese people are racist, only the racist ones ah”, indicating that they’re not slamming every Chinese Singaporean in the country.
Just two hours of posting the video, it had gotten 4,000 views and almost 150 shares on Facebook. However, by Tuesday afternoon, the video was taken down from Facebook and other social media channels. Both the original video as well as the re-uploaded ones have been taken down because of a complaint from the Government.

Mediacorp says sorry                     

After receiving flak from the public, Mediacorp in a statement given to The Sunday Times on 28 July, apologised for the advertisement.
The creative agency appointed for the advertisement, Havas Worldwide, and The Celebrity Agency (TCA), Mediacorp’s celebrity management arm said, “We’re sorry for any hurt that was unintentionally caused. Behind the ad is an initiative to provide greater convenience to consumers, merchants and small food business.”
It also explained the use of Chew for multiple characters.
“The message behind this advertising campaign is that e-payment if for everyone. For that reason, Dennis Chew, well-known for his ability to portray multiple characters in a single production in a light-hearted way, was selected as the face of the campaign. He appears as characters from different walks of life in Singapore, bring home the point that everyone can e-pay.”
The epaysg.com website later removed the controversial advertisement.

Police report made

Although the Government went quite lenient with Mediacorp for their distasteful advertisement, they did not let Preetipls off the hook that easily. On Tuesday (30 July), police said in a statement that they are aware of the siblings’ rap video and a report has been lodged against it.
“The police will not tolerate any offensive content that causes ill will between races,” the police said while highlighting that they are investigating the matter.

Law Minister’s response

Upon viewing Preetipls and her brother’s video, Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shamugam also said that it “crosses the line” and is not acceptable.
Although Mr Shanmugam agrees that the epaysg.com advertisement was done “in poor taste”, but he said Preeti’s video did cross the line, nothing that he takes a “zero tolerance” approach to such matters. This is because he noted that if “speech, songs like this are allowed, slowly but surely, it will get worse.”
“This rap video insults Chinese Singaporeans, uses four-letter words on Chinese Singaporeans, vulgar gestures, pointing of middle finger, to make minorities angry with Chinese Singaporeans,” he said.
He added, “When you use four-letter words, vulgar language, attack another race, put it out in public, we have to draw the line and say not acceptable.”

He went on further to say that if someone doesn’t like content produced by another person, then they need to ask for an apology or lodge a police report.
“If (it was) something you didn’t like, then you ask for an apology. If you think it is criminal, you make a police report. You don’t cross the line yourself,” the Minister explained.
After reading the Government’s reaction towards Preetipls’s rap video along with her brother, netizens slammed the Government for their unfair treatment on ST’s Facebook page. They pointed out how Mediacorp got away for their advertisement with just an apology, but the sibling duo got a stronger reaction from the politicians.
Kirsten Han, the editor in chief of New Naratif, noted that “it’s just not fair when the majority gets to dictate what is just a bit of fun, and what is offensive”.

Others also voiced their support for the rap video and said that it is not offensive as it is funny, and the majority race in the country is “making up all the rules that perpetuate systemic racism”.






A bunch of netizens also said that Singaporeans are becoming very sensitive and can’t enjoy a simple joke. They mentioned that “people need to chill and have a sense of humour over little things in life.






However, other said that it’s not right to fight racism with racism. They said that replying to an offensive video with another offensive video is not the right way to do it. Some said that it’s best to stop the issue here and not allow a tit-for-tat reaction.



Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】宿舍冠毒检测已完成 逾两万客工进行隔离

我国跨部门防疫工作小组在8月7日声称,完成国内所有客工宿舍的冠状病毒19检测。不过,目前仍有2万3500名客工在进行隔离。 据卫生部昨晚(8月9日)所发出的文告指出,昨日新增冠病19病例多达175起,其中,宿舍的客工们就占了171起。 当局指出,跨政府部门防疫工作小组的检测工作虽然已经完成,但是冠毒检测结果仍未出炉。 进行隔离的客工们,被安置在指定的隔离设施内。他们将在隔离期结束时再次接受检测,因此卫生部预计冠毒病例将会持续居高,并在数日后才逐渐减少。 除了客工宿舍,昨日新增病例中包括了三起入境病例和一起社区病例,将我国的冠毒病例累积至5万5104起。 卫生部指出,在新增病例中,有98巴仙的病例已查出其感染群,其余的都在等待病例跟踪结果。

前进党批“泼马”不符透明问责原则 律政、通讯新闻部联合声明反驳

日前,新加坡前进党(Progress Singapore Party)发声明,,指目前《防假消息法》赋予部长权力,来宣布哪些消息内容是假的,但欠缺明确的阐释和标准,该党认为这并不符合透明和问责的原则。 不过,昨日(11日)律政部联合通讯及新闻部,发表声明反驳该党。 前进党的文告抨击,在未有明确阐释和标准的情况下,《防假消息法》赋权部长宣布哪些消息是假的。对此该部坚称,该法下要求部长明确说明为何相关内容存伪。如何定夺虚假讯息也有法律先例可循。 “近期动用《防假消息法》,对于消息为何存假,也有清楚解释。对此前进党和该党党员毕博渊先生也不否认,他自己的贴文存有不实信息。” 事缘前进党党员毕博渊(Brad Bowyer),在上月底被政府援引《防假消息法》,要求更正网络贴文。 该部声明也重申,《防假消息法》需符合一定条件才能使用,再者也允许被指控者上诉。 律政和通讯及新闻部也指责,前进党声称部长可随意施加任何惩处。该部反驳部长可给予更正指示;如相关人士拒绝遵循,只有法庭可以施加惩处。 不过吊诡的是,本社记者重新阅读新加坡前进党在本月10日发表的声明,从头到尾都未指控部长可随意施加任何惩处。 反驳毕博渊的嘴可曾被堵住?…

What was it like ‘inside’? – Former ISA detainee Tan Jing Quee (1939-2011)

Former ISA detainee  Tan Jing Quee passed away from cancer on 14 June…

“Serious doubts” about Govt’s compliance with legal obligations

In a letter published on the TODAY newspaper on 17 November, Ms…