The Economic Development Board (EDB) and Enterprise Singapore announced yesterday (30 July) that foreign PMETs looking to work in Singapore as “core team members” of technology companies might have more flexible requirements over the application of their Employment Pass (EP).
EDB and Enterprise Singapore will help “facilitate” easier entry of foreign PMETs to become “core team members” of technology companies operating in Singapore. Qualifying companies will have the EP applications of their core team members “facilitated” by the 2 government agencies so that they can get the “talent” they need.
Founder and CEO Sinuhe Arroyo of a tech company said, “Timely onboarding of the right talents is critical to our success in developing world-class AI solutions as well as seizing market opportunities. Entry facilitation for core team members will expedite this onboarding process.”
Foreign talents with “deep skills” but no qualifications can be considered too

But both EDB and Enterprise Singapore did not detail how EP applications for foreign talent will be different for these companies.
When asked by the media to elaborate, an EDB spokesman said manpower flexibilities for the applications of some team members will be provided, if needed.
“This includes considering alternative factors in the application if needed, such as the stock options remuneration of the core team members, or if they have deep skills in place of formal academic qualifications,” said the spokesman.
It’s also not known if the government would excuse these companies from advertising on the National Jobs Bank.
Under the current ruling, companies which want to employ “foreign talents” on EP to work in Singapore must advertise the job position on Jobs Bank for 2 weeks so as to give Singaporeans a chance to be considered for the job first.
In any case, many netizens have commented that the Jobs Bank is a “joke” since companies which are bend on hiring foreigners could easily give all kinds of excuse not to hire Singaporeans.
In the announcement, Chng Kai Fong, Managing Director of EDB, said that the programme will not only give tech companies the “confidence to hire the tech talent they need, but will also create exciting opportunities for Singaporeans to work in globally competitive teams alongside top engineers and entrepreneurs from all over the world. This will enable Singapore to upskill our local talent pool to root more technology companies here and grow the sector.”
But of course, MD Chng might have forgotten that if these tech companies can easily “hire-their-own-kind” from abroad with a much relaxed EP application process, why would they even bother to hire Singaporeans so as to “create exciting opportunities” for Singaporeans to work alongside with their people?
Hiring own kind
This has happened before. In 2013, then Manpower Minister Tan Chuan Jin told Parliament:

First, “hiring-their-own-kind”, or unfair hiring practices. We have heard anecdotes of how in certain cases, heads of business units or HR managers have a preference for candidates they are familiar with or of the same nationality, for reasons that are irrelevant to job performance and irrespective of whether they are more competent than other candidates.
We have also heard of situations where Singaporeans were retrenched or made to resign in the name of down-sizing, only to realise later that their positions were given to foreigners, who were coincidentally from the same countries as the business heads.
Let me be quite blunt. Would these practices not sound discriminatory? Would any respectable progressive company endorse these practices? If this hiring is indeed because they care only about choosing familiar candidates and not about hiring the “best man for the job”, then such practices have no place in Singapore’s workplaces. Discrimination will not and cannot be tolerated. Stating the principle however does not mean it is easy to implement.
I think we all recognise that proving discrimination is sometimes difficult. It is not always possible to discern whether such hiring practices are legitimately based on the objective requirements of the job or motivated by personal connections. We all know how “guanxi” works. I know that Singaporeans perceive some outcomes to be against the principles of meritocracy and fairness, and I fully understand why we feel angry in the process.

So, if a tech company can now flood its “core team” with foreigners but exclude any Singaporeans, how can Singapore upskill our local talent pool, MD Chng?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Human organs for sale

Society should help organ donors get a good price for their organs, argues Tan Kin Lian.

阻断措施实施以来 警至少接476宗家暴投报

自阻断措施实施以来,家庭暴力也随之上升,促使当局必须积极主动采取行动协助这些高风险的家庭。 根据警方的数据显示,已接获至少476宗涉及家庭暴力相关犯罪的通报。比起阻断措施前每月平均389宗 ,增幅至少22巴仙。 其中包括以武力殴打、恐吓和非法监禁所造成的伤害。 对此,警方强调,他们对此严正以待,并加强与机构的合作。他们将会再次评估更多高风险家庭,即使受害者不准备寻求帮助,他们也会将其家庭转接到社会服务机构,确保他们能够获得更多帮助。 “警方会在评估时考量多方因素,包括加害者的个人信息与施加暴力的潜质“,警方表示。 而向当局寻求协助的受害者也将会被转介至社会与家庭发展部所资助的庇护所。与此同时,警方也会定期与受害者联系,评估受害者的情况,并查明他们是否需要更多的协助。 另一方面,为了能够将家庭暴力连根拔起,警方也会介入协助解决加害者对家庭成员施暴的原因。除了安排社工的介入,也会评估是否需要接受心理辅导或经济协助。加害者也会被转介至适当的机构接受协助。 协助家庭施暴者是去年由勿洛警察局试行的内政团队社区援助与转介计划,并将推展至所有警署。 警方于上月23日表示,在阻断措施实施期间,个人与家庭可能会承受更多的压力,也导致暴力的产生。 因此,警方敦促若身陷家庭暴力的人,可以向社会与家庭发展部寻求协助,同时也鼓励家庭成员或公众能够提高警觉,一旦发现家庭暴力发生,即报警处理。

王瑞杰告诉外媒:淡马锡和政府投资公司 没任人唯亲问题

在上周五(本月17日),副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰接受瑞士媒体《新苏黎世报》(Neue Zürcher Zeitung)专访,被问及尽管新加坡有选举制度,但仍一党专政的问题。 《新苏黎世报》问道,“难道现在还不是开放更多民主与政治竞争的成熟时机吗?” 对此王瑞杰则辩护,新加坡拥有自由公平的选举制度,许多政党都有角逐上届选举,其中行动党有五名国会议员席位失守。 “这算是民主吗?我觉得是。而我们也确实尊重这个结果。事实上,我们执政党多年来赢得选举,与压迫无关,而是因为我们谨遵承诺,也赢得新加坡公民的信任。” 《新苏黎世报》接著追问,王瑞杰是否认为新加坡更适合一党专政,而且该如何避免因一党专政,而带来任人唯亲的问题。 王瑞杰则强调,果断的治理和领导能力至关重要。 “就好比我们国家,拥有自己的主权财富基金淡马锡控股和新加坡政府投资公司(GIC),作为财政部长我不曾干预过他们的投资决策。这是因为如果我干预,将没办法确保他们对自身的表现负责。”王瑞杰说。 他续指,“在宪法下,身为财政部长,我必须向国会负责;而我则必须要求主权基金的领导者负责。我们有严格的规章对付裙带关系,以及强硬打击贪腐的律法。” 王瑞杰:新加坡需建立和谐团结氛围 当被问及目前新加坡面临的何种挑战时,他则回答,最大的挑战是建立于维持“和谐与团结”的氛围,尤其现在全世界面临巨大与快速的改变。…