Second Minister for Finance Lawrence Wong

In this fresh chicken debacle where chicken rearer Eric Woo was cited by HDB for rearing chicken in his HDB flat. HDB officers told the 48-year old that keeping chickens in HDB flats was not allowed.
In a statement to TODAY, HDB said “Poultry, including chickens, are not allowed to be kept in HDB flats. They are not suitable to be kept as indoor pets and, when allowed to roam indiscriminately, may inconvenience the neighbours,” said the HDB.
Mr Woo, on the other hand, cited the Animals and Birds Act which states that people can keep up to 10 birds ‘in any premises’.
Still, Mr Woo does note that the National Parks Board (NParks) says on its website that poultry-keeping is illegal in HDB flat, however, he argued, “Since when does NParks have jurisdiction over HDB?”
NParks, however, said that the Animals and Birds act is a broad law and that landlords have a say on additional rules. In this case, HDB is the landlord, according to NParks.
Group director for community animal management of NParks’ Animal and Veterinary Service arm, Ms Jessica Kwok said, “Owners are also subject to rules of their landlord, which may or may not allow the keeping of poultry within their managed areas.”
The thing is, back in September 2018 at the HDB’s Peak Forum, Minister for National Development Mr Lawrence Wong had said that it is “factually and legally wrong” to claim that HDB flat buyers do not own their flats and are merely renting. He adds that there is no basis to such a claim.
Mr Wong said that all buyers of leasehold properties whether private or public enjoy ownership rights over their properties in the duration of the lease, adding that it is ‘important to set the record straight’ on the matter.
Clearly, what NParks says now about HDB being ‘landlords’ and thus have the prerogative to implement additional rules for residents is contradictory to Mr Wong’s statements.
Under the Protection against Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act which was hastily passed through Parliament in May this year, the definition of of falsehoods is extended to any statement that is ‘misleading … whether in whole or in part, and whether on its own or in the context in which it appears.
Given the conflicting stances, will POFMA be applied this instance to either party? We’ll say it is probably not given that these are conflicting statements coming from the administration, not to mention that it is the Minister(s) who decide what are the “falsehoods” that should be taken to task.
But let’s say a news site or opposition politicians were to repeat the same kind of conflicting statements, such as the statement by International Property Advisor Pte Ltd and co-founder of HugProperty.com, Mr Ku Swee Yong back in 2018 where he contested the ownership of HDB and advocated that the population should be educated regarding the ownership of residential property in Singapore, particularly that of HDB flats.
Do you think POFMA would be applied to them then?
If you do, which isn’t hard to see why. Isn’t it clear that POFMA is inherently biased and does not actually address falsehoods and misleading statements which are spread by the government itself?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

259 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; 253 locally transmitted cases, 116 unlinked

As of Saturday noon (4 Sep), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…

Singapore: Multiculturalism or the melting pot?

Celebrate our commonalties rather than highlight our differences.Gerald Giam

中介包装“高薪、轻松”假象 新加坡台籍辅警工时长高劳力

日前,本地网络媒体《红蚂蚁》报导台湾人到新加坡当辅警的现象,也引起台湾媒体关注和转载。有者描绘“这行饭不好吃”,虽然薪资优渥但也留不住台湾人。 根据台湾中央通讯社,在上月21日发表的一篇文章,内容指当地警官黄俊树发表硕士论文,探讨台人到新加坡当辅助警察的情况。 其中黄俊树指出,在台湾,人力中介公司往往把这份工作,包装成“高薪,在机场轻松工作”假象,但实际工作情形和分发地点却有差距。 黄俊树称,辅警工时12小时以上,须在新加坡重要据点(如兀兰关卡)值勤,属高劳力负担工作,台湾人要到新加坡当辅警,要有心理准备,衡量自身体力。 如果缺乏执法人员责任感、抱着来新加坡打工度假的心态,很难胜任。 他不否认,在新当辅警每月5万7000台币的底薪,加上加班费可达到月入7万台币(约3000新元)的可观收入,对于大学毕业、想存钱肯吃苦的青年确实很有吸引力。 他分析,到狮城的中国游客不少,也急需精通中文的辅警维持秩序。但是在新马地区却很难招到人手。招募台湾人当辅警,不仅节省保安公司成本,而且大多有大学学历,服务态度良好,能提升公司形象。 但是,一些台籍辅警也萌生去意,主要原因是工作量大、工时长且劳动和所得比例不想当,有者两年合约期满后不愿续约。 不过即便如此,在台湾的招聘求职网站,仍能看到许多招募前来新加坡当辅警的帖子。 民众:为何不改善聘本地辅警待遇? 新加坡的策安(Certis Cisco)与翔鹰(AETOS)保安公司,三年前就获得内政部批准,前往台北和高雄的大专学府,吸引当地人来当辅警,当时就开出2千575新元月薪+100元津贴,加上4000元入伍花红的优渥条件。…

Carousell donates S$2 million worth of ad inventory to support non-profit organisations

On Thursday (16 April), Carousell, one of the world’s largest and fastest…