Second Minister for Finance Lawrence Wong

In this fresh chicken debacle where chicken rearer Eric Woo was cited by HDB for rearing chicken in his HDB flat. HDB officers told the 48-year old that keeping chickens in HDB flats was not allowed.
In a statement to TODAY, HDB said “Poultry, including chickens, are not allowed to be kept in HDB flats. They are not suitable to be kept as indoor pets and, when allowed to roam indiscriminately, may inconvenience the neighbours,” said the HDB.
Mr Woo, on the other hand, cited the Animals and Birds Act which states that people can keep up to 10 birds ‘in any premises’.
Still, Mr Woo does note that the National Parks Board (NParks) says on its website that poultry-keeping is illegal in HDB flat, however, he argued, “Since when does NParks have jurisdiction over HDB?”
NParks, however, said that the Animals and Birds act is a broad law and that landlords have a say on additional rules. In this case, HDB is the landlord, according to NParks.
Group director for community animal management of NParks’ Animal and Veterinary Service arm, Ms Jessica Kwok said, “Owners are also subject to rules of their landlord, which may or may not allow the keeping of poultry within their managed areas.”
The thing is, back in September 2018 at the HDB’s Peak Forum, Minister for National Development Mr Lawrence Wong had said that it is “factually and legally wrong” to claim that HDB flat buyers do not own their flats and are merely renting. He adds that there is no basis to such a claim.
Mr Wong said that all buyers of leasehold properties whether private or public enjoy ownership rights over their properties in the duration of the lease, adding that it is ‘important to set the record straight’ on the matter.
Clearly, what NParks says now about HDB being ‘landlords’ and thus have the prerogative to implement additional rules for residents is contradictory to Mr Wong’s statements.
Under the Protection against Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act which was hastily passed through Parliament in May this year, the definition of of falsehoods is extended to any statement that is ‘misleading … whether in whole or in part, and whether on its own or in the context in which it appears.
Given the conflicting stances, will POFMA be applied this instance to either party? We’ll say it is probably not given that these are conflicting statements coming from the administration, not to mention that it is the Minister(s) who decide what are the “falsehoods” that should be taken to task.
But let’s say a news site or opposition politicians were to repeat the same kind of conflicting statements, such as the statement by International Property Advisor Pte Ltd and co-founder of HugProperty.com, Mr Ku Swee Yong back in 2018 where he contested the ownership of HDB and advocated that the population should be educated regarding the ownership of residential property in Singapore, particularly that of HDB flats.
Do you think POFMA would be applied to them then?
If you do, which isn’t hard to see why. Isn’t it clear that POFMA is inherently biased and does not actually address falsehoods and misleading statements which are spread by the government itself?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Tin Pei Ling questioned on her Facebook page over comment that Singapore is giving $23,225 per capita of COVID-19 budgetary support

In Parliament yesterday (4 Jun), Member of Parliament for MacPherson SMC Tin…

明晚需停业,夜店办“告别”派对? 旅游局提醒警将到场监督

新加坡旅游局、企业发展局以及警方发出联合文告,提醒在26日晚之前,夜店业者仍需遵守目前的措施,包括禁250人以上的活动、确保参与者保持安全距离、避免聚集等。 “对于未能遵守措施者我们将毫不手软采取行动。” 跨政府部门抗疫工作小组是在昨日宣布一系列新措施,包括所有娱乐场所:戏院、酒吧、夜总会、夜店、剧院和卡拉OK等将从26日晚起需停业,预计禁令将维持至下月30日。若疫情仍未好转将可能延长实施期限。 不过,文告中提及,当局发现有一些夜店经营者,打算在今晚(25日)举办“告别”活动,这可能吸引大量人群聚集。 为此,文告强调上述政府举措的用意,就是要减少形成本地感染群的风险。 当局提醒从现在起至26日晚上11时59分期间,夜店业者受促保持严谨社交距离措施,也禁止超过250人的活动。 “即时少于250人,也应落实所有预防措施,包括保持至少一米距离,也减少参与者聚集一起。” 当局提醒,当局可执法确保业者遵守上述安全措施,政府部门官员包括警方未来两天都会到场监督。交警也会全岛执法,打击酒驾行为。 当局也呼吁,希望国人作出理智判断和尽社会责任,确保国人在全球疫情危机下度过难关。 截至昨日,本地累计确诊病558例,死亡病例两例。

TOC TV – Leong Sze Hian speaks on Ministerial Pay

How much does minister of state and civil servant in Singapore earns actually?