It was reported in the media that PAP politician, Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Home Affairs and National Development Sun Xueling, was at the Pan Pacific hotel on Monday (22 Jul), to help grace an event organised by Genium & Co, a leadership consultancy company founded by former SMRT CEO Desmond Kuek and his ex-SAF staff.
Before Kuek joined SMRT as its CEO back in 2012, he was the Chief of Defence Force, the highest ranking military personnel in SAF.
The one-day event at Pan Pacific hotel was to discuss “crisis leadership” in the digital age. Kuek used the massive SMRT train disruption incident on 7 Jul 2015 which affected some 250,000 people to illustrate how he had skillfully handled the crisis.
On that day 4 years ago, chaos reigned in the Singapore’s subway system. A power fault had led to a system-wide disruption in both the North-South and East-West Lines. Many commuters were angry with SMRT.
TodayOnline reported what’s happened that day:

Mrs Dorothy Chew, who took the train from Raffles Place, said the lights in her train were going on and off. “It was quite scary. I’ve never experienced a breakdown and this just had to happen on my son’s birthday.”…
Ms Janelle Tang, 27, had been waiting for an hour at a bus-stop near Buona Vista MRT station. “It was impossible to board because everyone was rushing towards the buses and the situation was very messy. There were no announcements when I was taking the Circle Line. There could have been announcements so that people can make alternative plans.”…
Engineer 38, Mr Nelson Teh, said he was rushing home to Admiralty from Toa Payoh at 7.20pm when he was notified that the NSL was down. “Their directions (for the shuttle buses) are not clear,” he said. “They said there were free shuttle buses but a lot of people didn’t know which exit to take. We had to ask the officers one-by-one.” He added that the crowd had waited for half an hour with no buses coming. He finally took a bus to Bishan MRT, as he had mistakenly thought only a part of the NSL was down. “I’m not sure what to do now; I think the taxis are also (in short supply).”
Security office Gordon Yeo, 62, whose workplace is at Raffles Place was going home to Toa Payoh. “I waited to board the train at 7.30pm. At first they told us the train journey would take 10 then 20 minutes longer. Then they told us the trains had stopped,” he said. “They provide free bus services but these are just the normal bus services … the queue at the bus shelter is from Fullerton Hotel to HSBC.”
Undergraduate Melody Gibson was at Ang Mo Kio station at about 7.45pm when she had to take a taxi. However, there were about 50 people waiting with just three to four taxis in line, she said. “The bus interchanges are crowded too. This has happened a number of times already – SMRT should make better plans to prepare for this. Why are there no shuttle buses?” she added.
“All trains are down. No shuttle buses in sight. Confusion at the bus stops. Absolute disaster,” said twitter user Kwan Jin Yao.

Kuek: Commuter safety comes first, no one was hurt
At the “crisis leadership” event, Kuek explained what he had decided to do.
Despite the potential damage to SMRT’s reputation, he chose to shut down the MRT lines as he felt that “commuter safety” should come first, said Kuek, as he pointed out that none of the commuters who de-trained during the evening peak hours were hurt.
“Putting people first” was among the lessons Kuek learnt from his days at SMRT, he said.
“Nobody wishes for crisis. But in today’s disruptive world, it must surely be anticipated and prepared for, since it is not a question of if but when,” said Kuek, who is also the divisional vice-chairman for UBS global wealth management.
However, SMRT was later fined $5.4 million by LTA for the breakdown on 7 Jul 2015.
Kuek also talked about his days in SAF. He said that the SAR crisis in 2003 and transnational terrorism after 9/11, together with new technologies and a declining birth rate, set the right conditions for the SAF to bring about organisational transformation and adopt new capabilities that helped it become the 3rd-generation, networked and integrated armed forces that it is today.
Senior Parliamentary Secretary and MP Sun Xueling took the opportunity to talk about crisis handling as well.
She said that digital platforms can be enablers and amplifiers of crises, such as in helping to spread falsehoods. But they can also be used to manage crises as part of a communications strategy.
“As leaders, we know all too well the need to be upfront with the public, with stakeholders when a crisis occurs… A lack of information can lead to panic, disorder and continued danger if the public does not know what to do or what to expect,” she said.
She said that for the Home Affairs ministry, digital technologies help leaders to gather information on suspicious sightings from members of the public using the SGSecure app.
They can also use the i-Witness function within the Police@SG mobile app to provide information about criminal activities to the police.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

申请延缓服役遭拒 本杰明:取得泰公民身份或是最佳选择

足球小将本杰明戴维斯去年申请延缓服役而遭拒,而如今取得泰国公民身份可能对他来说是最佳选择。 周一(7日)他接受泰国频道True4U的访问证实此事,“我和我的家人讨论过关于我的公民身份,而且现在已经有了决定,我可以从新加坡、泰国、威尔士以及英国作选择,而现在我决定是选择泰国。” 对他而言,泰国足球有着光明的未来和成功的机会。他表示,“最初我父亲想要我代表新加坡,但出于某种原因而无法达成。我母亲也非常高兴我获得了这个机会。” 现年18岁的本杰明出生在普吉岛,母亲是泰国人而父亲则是英国人。他五岁随家人移居新加坡,在9岁期间成为新加坡公民。 他曾代表新加坡参加16岁以下和U19级别的比赛,去年3月被召入国家队。四个月后,他加入了富勒姆足球俱乐部,并自2017年起获得奖学金,成为首位获得富勒姆足球俱乐部奖学金的新加坡人。然而,他也在获得喜讯的隔天,被国防部拒绝延缓服役的申请。 此一决定引发了体育界与公众,对体育选手服役以及国民维护新加坡防卫义务之间的讨论。 对此,国防部黄永宏曾提出三项解释,首先,本杰明是以英国身份为富勒姆踢球;再来,其父亲一直以“很多变数”拒绝表示本杰明确切服役的日子,父亲表示,一切都取决于他足球生涯的发展。 国防部曾指出,“参与海外足球协会与代表新加坡出征国际足球赛事是两码事,前者属专业职涯选择。” 最后,国防部表示本杰明父亲曾表明,即使延期不批准,本杰明仍然会与富勒姆签约,并以本杰明的事业为主,而选择放弃新加坡国际。 去年,本杰明试图申请延缓服役但遭拒,由于未在期限内报到入伍国民服役,并在未持有出境准证的情况下,逗留国外,同时触犯了国民服役征召法令,被指控逃役。 他原定在今年2月就要开始入营服役。 电竞选手以学术理由申请缓役获准…

TOC reports on General Election – 9 & 10 April

You can read the following TOC reports and videos on TOC’s General…

“民选议员提出项目要败选者批准” 余振忠:对民主的何等荒谬和嘲弄

“民选国会议员提出的社区项目,却要由败选候选人批准,这对于我们的民主是何等荒谬和嘲弄。拖延或无视追问只为耍手段,也令那些需要使用这些设施的居民不便。” 工人党议员毕丹星和阿裕尼集选区基层组织顾问蔡荣良,此前为了选区内无障碍斜坡工程项目,隔空骂战。如今工人党前非选区议员余振忠,也加入战围,抨击受人民委托的选区议员提出项目,还要败选候选人批准,实为“荒谬”和对民主的嘲弄。 余振忠回忆,即便自己未投身政治前,就已对这种为了选票而做翻新的举动感到恼火,甚至还曾为此写信到《海峡时报》论坛力陈此弊端。项目动用的是纳税人的钱,但这种机制就形同要挟居民,迫使他们投票给执政党。 他强调,新加坡应该是属于新加坡人的,而不是人民行动党,即便和许多国人一样,他感谢开国先贤们对良好经济发展的贡献,但不代表人民认同,以不民主的手段来巩固自身权力。 而人民如果选择让行动党继续执政,也应该是基于他们自发的选择,而不是因为本身的福祉被要挟。 2011年至2015年余振忠担任非选区议员,他很清楚自己没有权限动用如切单选区的人民协会或设施,也肯定没办法像蔡荣良那样,有权力审批社区项目。 他提及两周前,《海时》编辑蔡美芬提醒,行动党如过于蛮横恐怕会招致反弹。这番话可能是对第四代领导,对付本地剧作家异议的手段有微词。但同样的道理也适用在上述批准社区项目的机制问题,以及其他过度行使政治霸权而排除人民的事项。 “新加坡应该属于新加坡人的,不是任何政党。我们不应该容许这种霸权,透过不合理和不民主的手段来要挟新加坡人。” 毕丹星称提出体制问题 此前,工人党阿裕尼集选区议员毕丹星,抱怨选区内“一个简单、数月就可完工的无障碍斜坡,搞到要几年才完成。有多少乐龄人士、行动不便人士或康复者,无法从这类设施受益?” 他质疑行动党如何决定人民协会在反对党选区运作?也抱怨反对党议员提出的提案,往往都被人协忽略。 对此,蔡荣良,在本月19日发文反驳,表示对毕丹星对于上述无障碍斜坡项目发表不实言论“感遗憾”,也质疑后者借此事转移对工人党市镇会官司的注意。他也反驳毕丹星指因为是反对党的提案所以延迟的说法。…

No lockdown for Indonesia despite continuous rise in COVID-19 cases

Indonesia President Joko Widodo (Jokowi) has emphasized that he will not impose…