Connect with us

Current Affairs

港721游行抗议者涂鸦中联办 元朗白衣人袭击市民近45人受伤

Published

on

香港反送中运动持续中,尽管香港特首林郑月娥已宣布《逃犯条例》寿终正寝,但示威者却认为并未以“撤回”,且林郑月娥亦未回应其他四大需求,民阵于昨日(21日)发起撤回《逃犯条例》,以及设立独立委员会调查警民冲突。

尽管昨日游行并不如616 盛大,但仍聚集约43万人上街游行。

民阵宣布,游行有43万人参与。警方则表示,今天游行按原定路线最高峰为13.8万人。(图源:Getty Images)

据港媒报道,他们身穿黑衣戴着口罩以保护自身安全,而游行由维多利亚港集合出发,原定终点是湾仔卢押道,但示威者越过终点继续前进,占据金钟政府总部附近的主要道路,以及湾仔警察总部外的马路。示威者于中央人民政府驻香港特别行政区联络办公室外的招牌扔鸡蛋,以及其摄像头喷漆,要求主任王志民出来。

晚间10点,警方与示威者在上环爆发冲突,警方多次以催泪弹清场,据现场记者说明,警方疑似听到枪声,但未能确定是橡胶子弹还是布袋弹。凌晨时分,示威者逐步散去。

警方以催泪弹清场(图源:BBC)

白衣人袭击市民记者孕妇被殴倒地

与此同时,香港新界元朗亦爆发冲突,晚间11点,元朗西铁站聚集了大批“白衣人士”,声称在附近巡视,若见身着黑衣便会认定是从港岛参加游行回来,对他们进行围殴。据悉,白衣人士以“保卫元朗”为名,部分人手持长伞及竹条,追打身穿黑衣的人,多名示威者与记者受伤。

《立场新闻》《端传媒》报道,白衣人士堵截闸口袭击市民与记者,一度隔著閘口與市民對峙互罵。《立场新闻》记者直播期间遇袭,双手,右肩受伤流血,背部有大面积伤痕,后脑肿起,感晕眩,需停止采访工作。 其后,更多白衣人士涌入闸内,手持棍棒等武器,肆意向途人施袭。 民主党立法会议员林卓廷当时也在现场,同被白衣人打伤,手部受创,嘴角流血,前TVB记者柳俊江亦被打得血流披面,也有孕妇受袭倒地。

11点30分左右,警方抵达现场,多名市民向警方质问为何姗姗来迟,情绪激动。 虽然双方在警方的介入一度撤走,但凌晨1点白衣人士仍出现在西铁站空地,防暴警察其后到场开始在村口设置防线。

截至今日统计,元朗西铁站冲突事件已45人受伤,其中1人生命垂危、5人受重伤。

针对暴力事件各方的回应

《BBC中文网》报道,香港政府发言人发表声明,强烈谴责示威者恶意包围和冲击中联办大楼,并涂污国徽,公然挑战国家主权,称政府会严正以待并依法追究。

声明还称,部分激进人士有计划地煽动群众,已对 “一国两制”构成威胁,社会绝不能接受。

另外,国务院港澳办发言人和中联办负责人晚间也对示威者围堵、冲击和涂鸦中联办表示强烈谴责。

“这种行径公然挑战中央政府权威,触碰‘一国两制’原则底线,性质严重,影响恶劣,是绝对不能容忍的,”港澳办发言人称。

香港政府周一(22日)凌晨针对上环与元朗的冲突再次发声明,谴责暴力行为,说道“香港作为法治社会完全不能容忍任何暴力行为,特区政府予以强烈谴责,并会严正追究”。

香港记者协会、香港摄影记者协会、独立评论人协会亦发声明强烈谴责元朗站殴打记者的暴行,指现场有白衣人士抢去电视台摄影机掷至草丛毁坏。

图源:TMHK

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media

Dr Chee Soon Juan of the SDP raised concerns about the S$88 million sale of Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow at Astrid Hill, questioning transparency and the lack of mainstream media coverage. He called for clarity on the buyer, valuation, and potential conflicts of interest.

Published

on

On Sunday (22 Sep), Dr Chee Soon Juan, Secretary General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), issued a public statement on Facebook, expressing concerns regarding the sale of Minister for Home Affairs and Law, Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow (GCB) at Astrid Hill.

Dr Chee questioned the transparency of the S$88 million transaction and the absence of mainstream media coverage despite widespread discussion online.

According to multiple reports cited by Dr Chee, Mr Shanmugam’s property was transferred in August 2023 to UBS Trustees (Singapore) Pte Ltd, which holds the property in trust under the Jasmine Villa Settlement.

Dr Chee’s statement focused on two primary concerns: the lack of response from Mr Shanmugam regarding the transaction and the silence of major media outlets, including Singapore Press Holdings and Mediacorp.

He argued that, given the ongoing public discourse and the relevance of property prices in Singapore, the sale of a high-value asset by a public official warranted further scrutiny.

In his Facebook post, Dr Chee posed several questions directed at Mr Shanmugam and the government:

  1. Who purchased the property, and is the buyer a Singaporean citizen?
  2. Who owns Jasmine Villa Settlement?
  3. Were former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and current Prime Minister Lawrence Wong informed of the transaction, and what were their responses?
  4. How was it ensured that the funds were not linked to money laundering?
  5. How was the property’s valuation determined, and by whom?

The Astrid Hill property, originally purchased by Mr Shanmugam in 2003 for S$7.95 million, saw a significant increase in value, aligning with the high-end status of District 10, where it is located. The 3,170.7 square-meter property was sold for S$88 million in August 2023.

Dr Chee highlighted that, despite Mr Shanmugam’s detailed responses regarding the Ridout Road property, no such transparency had been offered in relation to the Astrid Hill sale.

He argued that the lack of mainstream media coverage was particularly concerning, as public interest in the sale is high. Dr Chee emphasized that property prices and housing affordability are critical issues in Singapore, and transparency from public officials is essential to maintain trust.

Dr Chee emphasized that the Ministerial Code of Conduct unambiguously states: “A Minister must scrupulously avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest between his office and his private financial interests.”

He concluded his statement by reiterating the need for Mr Shanmugam to address the questions raised, as the matter involves not only the Minister himself but also the integrity of the government and its responsibility to the public.

The supposed sale of Mr Shamugam’s Astrid Hill property took place just a month after Mr Shanmugam spoke in Parliament over his rental of a state-owned bungalow at Ridout Road via a ministerial statement addressing potential conflicts of interest.

At that time, Mr Shanmugam explained that his decision to sell his home was due to concerns about over-investment in a single asset, noting that his financial planning prompted him to sell the property and move into rental accommodation.

The Ridout Road saga last year centred on concerns about Mr Shanmugam’s rental of a sprawling black-and-white colonial bungalow, occupying a massive plot of land, managed by the Singapore Land Authority (SLA), which he oversees in his capacity as Minister for Law. Minister for Foreign Affairs, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, also rented a similarly expansive property nearby.

Mr Shanmugam is said to have recused himself from the decision-making process, and a subsequent investigation by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) found no wrongdoing while Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean confirmed in Parliament that Mr Shanmugam had removed himself from any decisions involving the property.

As of now, Mr Shanmugam has not commented publicly on the sale of his Astrid Hill property.

Continue Reading

Trending