Posting on Facebook this Tuesday, sociologist and member of the Worker’s Party Daniel Goh shared his experience with the homeless in Singapore. The associate professor posted a photo of a void deck at a flat somewhere in Singapore and shared a tale of a homeless man who had temporarily sought refuge there.

Assoc Prof Goh said, “A resident sent me a photo of a man resting here, curled up from the cold, surrounded by cardboard boxes and meagre belongings, a couple of shirts hanging from the metal grilles. I tried looking for him since, at different times of the day and night, but couldn’t find him.”

He then highlights various reasons a person might end up sleeping on the streets in Singapore – not being able to go home for one reason or another, rejecting assistance, people caught between jobs or long hours, some who just want to be left alone.

The WP member added, “I have searched and met a number of “homeless” persons while helping Mr Low with constituency work. A few residents see this as a municipal problem for the town council, the “homeless” an unwanted guest. Most feel sorry for those roughing it out in the elements but don’t know how to help them. It is a testimony that one stayed on long enough, as paramedics attended to a “homeless” man who fainted, to help me locate him later.”

He admits that he doesn’t really know how to help either, saying that he only try to talk to them and offer help.

Describing one encounter, he says “Once I dissuaded a man from setting up camp in a void deck as this affected residents there and fixed a day with him to drive and accompany him to MSF to seek assistance. But he cleared out and said he was going to go live with a friend.”

On another occasion, he has left a card for a man who was living in a disused study area in the void deck, but the man cleared out the next day, never reaching out.

Assoc Prof Goh said, “I don’t leave cards anymore; I just hope to meet them to talk.”

To some, reading this story might come as a surprise – that there are homeless people in shiny Singapore. But in fact, the Ministry of Social & Family Development said they assisted an average of 385 homelessness cases each year between 2015 and 2017.

Upon hearing this, many people subconsciously adopt stereotypes of homeless people, that they are lazy and/unemployed, which is how they ended up sleeping on the streets in the first place.

But according to a survey by welfare organisation Montfort Care and volunteer group SW101 in 2017, two third of the 180 street-sleepers who were interviewed said they have a job and more than 25% said they even have a flat to their name. A quarter of them are also married. The survey dispelled these stereotypes about homeless people in Singapore.

Homeless not from lack of trying

In an article, the Asia Law Network (ALN) pointed out that many people in Singapore end up homeless not because they are ‘lazy’ or ‘unemployed’. They argue that many tend to fall into trouble due to tenancy disagreements, poorly managed finances, cheating and fraud, or a lack of understanding of their legal rights.

ALN noted that the majority of people stuck in this difficult situation tend to be the elderly and those who are not highly educated.

The thing is, the current system is less than effective in helping people like this out of a tough situation, particularly when it comes to securing a home. Finding a place to stay is rather difficult for some people.

In an article (October 2017), TODAY interviewed several homeless people who had slept at the Bras Basah Complex. Three out of four of those interviewed by TODAY had camped at Bras Basah Complex at some point.

One person had told them that the Government’s rental housing schemed didn’t work for him as he had to live with a stranger. Another said he had a bad experience with a roommate from that same scheme.

While there are schemes and programmes out there with the intention of helping those in need secure housing, the eligibility criteria are often tough to meet. For example, the Fresh Start Housing Scheme which was intended to help former flat owners living in public rental flats to transition back into HDP  ownership misses the mark a little.

AWARE argues that for many single mothers, impoverishment and homelessness are pressing threats and they need immediate access to rental housing, not eventual access to housing ownership. One single mother told AWARE that she was regarded by HDB as “too well-off to qualify for a rental flat, but too poor to buy a flat.” Those in this situation end up having to rent homes in the open market, dipping into whatever savings they have. At the end of the 30-month debarment period, many will have become poor.

Moreover, the criteria that these people need to meet to be eligible for assistance under Fresh Start includes continuous employment and regular school attendance.

Simple though that may sound, AWARE points out that poverty itself often leads to gaps in employment and schooling which in turn makes them ineligible for assistance.

Single mothers have a hard time securing continuous employment when they need to take care of their children, especially children with disabilities and it’s difficult to maintain steady schooling when you’re shuffling around different living arrangements regularly. It’s a self-perpetuating cycle.

Those who do work often find themselves falling into financial hardship because when they earn more income, the price of HDB rental housing often goes up. This makes it difficult for them to accumulate any savings at all.

Worse still, if a single mother starts working, subsidies drop on the assumption that she can immediately pay for all her children’s expenses but that doesn’t take into account the extra expenses necessary when working such as transport and meals.

A system that wants to help but isn’t quite as efficient

Another example if that of elderly Singaporean Mr Lim Kee Khoon who was sleeping in the Henderson Hawker Centre for two months as he had trouble finding a place to live with his brother.

The 70-year old used to live in a rental flat that he was forced to share with a stranger, ah elderly gentlemen. His flatmate had apparently suffered a stroke earlier in his life leaving him partially disabled, meaning Mr Lim suddenly became his flatmate’s de facto caretaker and had to take on the extra financial burden.

Desperate for money as he could not take on a normal job, Mr Lim resorted to working as a drug courier. He was caught and sentenced to 10 years in jail at 63-year old. He was released early at 70 for good behaviour.

After prison, Mr Lim tried apply for a rental flat with his brother. Unfortunately, his brother had sold a flat 8 years ago and the officers whom Mr Lim spoke with said that his brother has to wait another 2 years before they are eligible to rent together.

Political activist Brad Bowyer who highlighted Mr Lim’s case on social media described Mr Lim as a victim of ““poorly conceived rules” and “institutionalised and systematic neglect”.

No one was really helping and Mr Lim was stuck. Mr Bowyer highlighted how Mr Lim’s cries for help to the Tanjung Pagar MP Joan Pereira and HDB were left unanswered.

Responding to the claims, the Housing Development Board (HDB) came forward to say that Singapore’s Social Service Office (SSO) had been in touch with Mr Lim and were trying to provide assistance.

SSO said they tried to offer help but were declined several times while Tanjung Pagar MP Joan Pereira said that various government agencies have been in touch with Mr Lim to offer assistance.

Speaking to TOC, Mr Lim verified Mr Bowyer’s version of events. He also explained that that he was told to seek shelter at a halfway house but he rejected the offer because he didn’t want to get back into bad company again. He just wanted to get back into a normal life.

Mr Lim shared that he was being passed from one agency to another and eventually had to seek shelter at the market and got goodwill assistance from members of public who pitied him.

This story does have a happy ending though, as Mr Lim’s application to share a rental flat has since been processed with the help of a Mr Yip Kum Fei from HDB and his team. He now lives in a modest flat with his brother who has started working as a cleaner.

Mr Lim said to TOC in the previous meet up that all the help he needs from the government is to have a roof over his head so that he can concentrate on working to make ends meet.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

陆交局计划扩展脚车道,放眼2030年总长达1300公里

交通部兼卫生部高级政务部长蓝彬明表示,在未来几年内,将会三倍扩张脚踏车道,让被禁止上人行道的电动滑板车有更多的空间骑车。 自上月5日颁布电动滑板车禁令以来,电动滑板车的行车通道受限,只能在公园联道(PCN)和脚踏车道行驶。 周二蓝彬明出席宏茂桥的一个脚踏车道活动上表示,由于禁令颁布后,电动滑板车的行驶大受影响,因此决定扩展自行车道。他透露,陆交局计划将在2025年,放眼脚车道扩大至750公里,到2030年扩大至1300公里。 “目前我们还在研拟中,希望能在未来几年提出来”,他表示。 蓝彬明说,目前陆交局正与交通部合作,联络各市议会的基层顾问达到建设脚车道,同时也考虑填海道路,为自行车道创造更多的空间。 蓝彬明昨早与基础建设统筹部长兼交通部长许文远、交通部兼通讯及新闻部高级政务部长普杰立医生,以及活跃通勤咨询小组主席费绍尔博士,齐聚本地首个模范步行与脚踏车市镇—宏茂桥,骑车视察已完工的活跃通勤设施。 蓝彬明认为宏茂桥全长20公里的脚车道正在修建当中,将在2022年完成,届时将成为城镇中最长的自行车道。 对于建立完整的脚车道网络,蓝彬明也坦言确实会遇到挑战。 “据我所知,各个城镇间都可能存在着地理限制,因此我们将尽可能尝试创建各区的自行车车道。” 他表示,将会与国家公园管理局和市区重建局研究如何优化使用空间,包括使用填海道路为自行车道创造更多空间等。 费绍尔曾言脚车和PMD助打造少车社会 事实上,早在2015年,费绍尔曾在国会表示,相信脚车和个人代步工具(PMD),能协助打造减少车辆的社会;且当局有广泛计划拓展“全国骑行计划”,支持骑行作为行程最初和最后一里,或是城市里的短途的交通通勤方式。…

罗厘车斗设隔板载客工? 人力部、陆交局:不安全

日前在脸书上流传,一家建筑公司自行改造罗厘车斗,用隔板把乘车客工“隔离”开来以保持安全距离。 但是,人力部和陆路交通管理局商议后,认为此做法或许会危及车上的乘客,甚至是其他的道路使用者,很不安全。 人力部表获悉有关视频后,指出那是该公司向当局提呈的建议和示范,是在建筑公司范围内拍摄,但是还未正式使用。 当局指出,在和陆交局进行商议和评估后,认为隔板会在卡车行驶时突然移动,乘客和其他道路使用者的生命安全或受影响。因此当局在周三(5月13日)已经向该公司郑重声明,并不采纳这种设计,而且也不安全。 此外,人力部也强调已设立新规定,即在罗厘车斗的客工们也必须保持一米的安全距离,因此每辆罗厘的载送客工数量将受到限制。 另一方面,有关公司昨日在脸书帖文澄清,有关视频只是演练,并对引起误会表示歉意。 Shin Khai建筑表示,建议在罗厘上设隔板,主要是保护客工免受冠状病毒传染,并解决客工载送数量限制的问题。 该公司表示,虽然视频引起关注,吸引更多的建议,然而也因此一些误会,以为该公司不人道且无礼对待客工,因此表示歉意。

电动车吸引力不足、基设待加强,议员疑2040能全面淘汰内燃车?

日前政府在宣布2020财政预算案,放眼2040年前淘汰所有内燃式引擎车辆,有议员指出,虽然政府推动彩色通勤有意减少碳排放,但要改用电动车的吸引力不足,所规划的基础设施也有待加强,因此在转换的过程中可能面对困难。 工人党非选区议员陈立峰,目前我国面临最大的问题是基础设施的不完善,虽然本地电力过剩,但新加坡正迈向智慧国发展,未来对于电需求也会持续上升,可能会导致电网负荷过重,因此必须在落实这项措施前,重整整套基础设施。 目前本地共1千600个充电站,而政府日前宣布在2030年前,将充电点增至2万8千个。对此陈立峰表示,这样即使到了2030年,有三成换成电动车,一个充电点可能仍需服务10两车,负荷过重。因此他建议,政府可建造电池交换站,既能节省充电,也可更好管理电网的负担。 最多两万元回扣   不足吸引消费者转换电动车 另一方面,为了鼓励更多人购买电动车,明年1月起至2023年底,凡是购买电动车或德士的人,可享有高达45巴仙电动车附加注册费优惠,回扣顶限为2万元。 但是裕廊集选区议员洪维能与蔡厝港集选区议员余家兴认为,由于充电时间过长,加上电动车使用的锂离子电池非常昂贵,两万元的回扣不足以吸引民众换电动车。 此外,环境及水源部制定战略来支持我国自产粮食,以应变气候变化与地缘政治局势。对此,官委议员伊萨德若要巩固食品保障,并非仅靠拨款即可,更是需要打造新的生态环境,以取得正面的扩充效应。 “新加坡若要继续投入资源巩固我国的食品保障,单靠拨款是不足够的。我们必须打造一个创新的生态环境,以取得正面的扩充效应。”

Polling agents behaviour reinforce stereotype of PAP being “arrogant and not playing fair”, says WP polling agent

A polling agent for the Worker’s Party in Marine Parade GRC said…