Human rights and law reform organisation Lawyers for Liberty (LFL) released a statement today (16 July) calling for Singapore authorities to withdraw “baseless allegations and unwarranted threats” against Malaysian lawyer and founder of LFL N Surendran who has been representing Malaysians death row prisoners, including Pannir Selvam Pranthaman.
It appears that the Singapore-General’s Chambers has made the accusation in a letter dated 12 July noting that the lawyer has made “scandalous allegations against Singapore and its legal system, including accusing Singapore of acting in total disregard of international legal norms and decent world opinion,” said LFL director Melissa Sasidaran in a statement.
She added, “Coming from the Attorney General’s office in a formal note to the High Court, this amounts to a serious threat against Surendran. Singapore is notorious for bringing contempt of court or criminal defamation charges against its critics. British author Alan Shadrake was similarly prosecuted and jailed in 2011 for making remarks on the death penalty in Singapore.”
Mr Surendran is the lead Malaysian lawyer and an instructing solicitor to the Singapore lawyers representing Pannir in court.
For those who are unfamiliar with the name Pannir, the 31-year-old is actually a Malaysian sentenced to death for a drug offence committed in May 2017. He recently gained prominence after he was granted a last-minute reprieve from execution by the Singapore Court of Appeal on 23 May, and his legal challenge against denial of clemency by the President will be heard this Friday (19 July).
Besides Pannir, Mr Surendran is also acting as counsel for the four other Malaysians drug mules facing death sentence in Singapore.
LFL pointed out that Singapore authorities’ action “is a calculated attempt to sabotage Pannir’s legal team, as well as hindering legal assistance from Malaysia for the other Malaysian prisoners”.
If that is not all, the threat made against the lawyer is also a breach of The Republic’s own laws and Constitution, the statement noted. This is because based on Article 9 of the Constitution, it gives everyone the right to a fair trial including the right to legal advice and representation.
“In doing so, Singapore is also in flagrant breach of international law and standards; the right to be provided legal assistance is enshrined in Article 14(3)(d) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).”
As such, LFL demands that Singapore “urgently withdraw the baseless allegations and unwarranted threat” made against the lawyer, and urged Malaysian government to intervene in order to ensure Pannir and the four other Malaysian drug mules facing death sentence “are not prejudiced or deprived of legal defence or assistance” in Singapore.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

起诉许渊臣诽谤诉讼 总理将出庭供证

总理李显龙将在起诉《网络公民》总编许渊臣的诽谤诉讼,选择出庭供证。 总理新闻秘书张俪霖是在昨晚(10日)发文告如是表示。 张俪霖称,如案件开审,总理会选择出庭供证,是因为对他的指控是不实的。 她表示总理弟妹也可与许渊臣一起决定,届时是否一同作证,在法庭上重复对总理的指控。之后由法庭来辨明事实。 在本月1日,总理新闻新闻秘书张俪霖,代表总理向本社总编许渊臣发函,指本社英语站在8月15日刊登的一篇评论,复述针对总理的不实指控,要求本社撤下并在三日内道歉。 许渊臣则在9月4日答复总理,认为有关评论文章不含诽谤性,而是根据可能对事件知情的总理家人此前发表的公开声明,也有鉴于涉及公共利益问题,为了能避免造成疑虑,只能重新复述总理弟妹曾说过的话。 本月5日起诉本社总编许渊臣,后者在当天收到代表总理李显龙的达文星律师楼( Davinder Singh Chambers LLC)寄来的原告诉状和法庭传票。 诉状中对本社英语站发表的有关文章提出异议,指该文章作出不实和无根据,并且贬低和诋毁总理。 不过,针对要求移除文章和无条件作出道歉,以及承诺不在《网络公民》刊登类似的指控,许渊臣则婉拒了这些要求。…

阿裕尼工人党志工 安排餐点、二手家具予有需要家户

阿裕尼集选区的工人党志工,在本周末拜访有需要选民,例如巴耶利峇区的志工,便将民众捐赠的家具,赠送给租赁组屋的一些家户。 在工人党社区基金下,持续推动“蓝色环保”(BlueCycle)活动,鼓励民众捐出物品,帮助社区中有需要的居民。 据阿裕尼集选区官方脸书的照片,显示其中一家住户获得二手沙发。工人党志工也为一名年长者安装床架,让老人家不再需要打地铺,起落床也比较容易。 也有受惠单位获得一张厨房料理台,终于可以在家自己煮食,省下需要出外用餐的花费。 至于阿裕尼加基武吉议员莫哈默费沙,也确保那些有需要的居民,能获分配膳食。这批受惠人士到附近参与善心活动的店铺扫码,就能领取膳食。 工人党强调,热心人士的捐赠不仅改善这些清寒居民的居家生活,小小善举也为他们增添欢乐。 至于有兴趣捐赠物品的民众,可到工人党社区基金了解进一步详情:http://www.wpcf.sg/bluecycle.html?fbclid=IwAR1_I3lZA7pQCtqU84sbPtUaujXoIwd5cpwgATurisfhcYPmuNoBTDJnDco   Paya Lebar Division WPCF…

Vodafone Firsts takes two grannies on board a plane- for the very first time

By Yasmeen Banu Late last year, Vodafone- a British multinational telecommunications company…

内政部否认歧视本地死囚

44岁新加坡男子苏海(Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin),因面对贩毒罪名成立,原定于上周五(18日)执行绞刑。 不过苏海成功向上诉庭提呈上诉,以进行司法检讨,直至上诉庭聆聆审,前者的执刑将暂缓。 苏海是透过代表律师拉维(M Ravi)提呈司法检讨,申诉公民似乎面对不平等对待。因为冠病疫情关系,一些外籍囚犯的家属由于无法来狮城探访死囚,他们的处刑获押后。但其他死囚如新加坡死囚则可能先被安排上绞刑台。 上诉庭在本月22日聆审苏海的上诉。据拉维的脸书更新贴文,坦言庭上交锋激烈,上诉庭要求总检察署和辩方都要再提呈进一步的陈述。下一次的聆讯定在10月7日。 针对苏海的申诉,内政部还特别发文告,否认在处刑的排期上存歧视成分。不论是外籍囚犯或本国公民, 若试过了所有法律或特赦上诉途径,才会被安排处刑。 当局也指出,2019年进行了四次司法处刑,就包括两名新加坡公民和两名外籍人士,也指苏海的指控毫无根据。…