Last Monday, undergraduate student Marcus Aw Chen Feng, 21, wrote to ST Forum arguing against the impending raise of GST to 9%, which is expected to happen between 2021 and 2025 announced by the new PM-designate Heng Swee Keat in Parliament earlier (‘Drawbacks to raising GST‘, 8 Jul).
Marcus wrote, “Raising taxes means higher prices for consumer goods, including necessities such as rice, salt and sugar. This will adversely affect the spending power of lower-income residents. They will have less disposable income for other expenditures and may become unhappy.”
“High tax rates can negatively affect economic growth. The cost of production will increase for firms, making them less willing and able to invest in their businesses. They may even cut back on production, resulting in unemployment,” he added.
Marcus also said that the increased cost would even deter foreign firms from investing in Singapore. He proposed that to combat inequality, Singapore could introduce progressive taxation so that the rich would get taxed more instead of the poor.
No doubt, implementing Marcus’ proposal would mean taxing people like our high-salaried million-dollar ministers and civil servants more, and nobody likes to be taxed more.
MOF defends raising GST
In a ST Forum letter today, the MOF Director of Corporate Communications Lim Yuin Chien, who is a Public Administration Medal winner, wrote in to debunk Marcus (‘Increased GST needed to support rising expenditures‘, 15 Jul).
Not surprisingly, Mr Lim echoed what Heng Swee Keat had said in Parliament that GST rate has to be increased to help support “rising expenditures to care for an ageing population”.
Mr Lim also said that the increase is also needed to invest in early childhood education and to keep Singapore safe from “rising security threats like terrorism”. One can only surmise that the previously announced acquisitions of those billion-dollar stealth planes, ships and advanced submarines must have been targeted to be used on the would-be terrorists.
“The GST collected will support public spending that benefits Singaporeans, in the form of social support and security spending so that we can better care for, develop and protect our people,” Mr Lim said.
As for helping the lower-income group, he said that the government will “continue to fully absorb GST on subsidised education and subsidised healthcare”.
“We will continue with and enhance the current GST Voucher scheme when the GST is raised, to defray costs for lower-income households and seniors,” he said.
It’s not hard to imagine that these lower-income households and seniors who end-up receiving those free GST vouchers would probably be “grateful” to the ruling government and enhance their nostalgic feelings about the “lightning logo” when elections come.
Mr Lim continued, “We are focused on ensuring that Singapore’s overall system of taxes and transfers, comprising subsidies and grants from the Government, remains equitable. Lower-income households receive more transfers from the Government than all the taxes they pay, while the better-off pay more taxes than the transfers they receive.”
But Mr Lim also said that the government has been “actively tapping progressive taxes”. He said, “We announced the increase in personal income tax rates for higher-income earners in 2015, and increased buyer’s stamp duties for higher-value residential properties last year.”
As for Marcus’ argument that high GST rates may affect economic growth and investments, Mr Lim countered that GST is applied on domestic consumption and that businesses are allowed to claim GST incurred on their purchases.
“As such, GST does not discourage savings, work and investments. Our system of taxes and transfers strikes a balance to help Singapore maintain its competitiveness globally, and we will continue to review and refine it,” Mr Lim concluded.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

情况有变 总理:戴口罩可保护自己和他人

今年1月底,总理李显龙曾表示身体不适时才需要戴口罩。不过他在今午(3日)的直播中,坦言政府重新思考对口罩的建议。 “之前建议民众不适才戴口罩,当时还没有社群传播,且政府仍给每户家庭四张口罩。但如今社群中可能仍有未发现的感染者,也可能传染给人,故此世卫组织和美国传染病中心也在重新检讨。但目前也有证据显示,冠状病毒19感染者也可能没出现症状,仍会把病毒传给他人。 故此,对于那些可能已被感染而不自知的,穿戴口罩也可保护他人。也能让年长者获得更好的保护。 不过他指出,我们仍需要把手术口罩留给前线医护人员。而周日政府将发布可循环使用的口罩给群众,他也赞许社区先前自发发布口罩给有需要的人。 李显龙强调,不管有没有戴口罩,都需要勤洗手保持安全距离。

不曾与外籍人士竞争过工作 “纸将军”有资格谈不公雇佣现象?

犹记得今年初,工人党党魁毕丹星在国会询问,从2015至2018年,新加坡公民和永久居民就业率的对比。他也提及通常政府把“本地人”都涵括公民和永久居民。 对此,贸工部长陈振声直言:“我可以给你数据,但这么问背后意义又是什么?” 如今他应该知道其意义所在,有关不公平雇佣现象,和外国人在部分企业中占据优势的争议愈发增加,甚至连全国职工总会的秘书长黄志明也已警觉而现身表态,指政府需要缩紧就业准证(Employment Pass)政策。 讽刺的是,陈振声和黄志明都不曾与任何外国人竞争过任何工作,他们在军旅稳健建功勋,但他们是否能够感同身受,经历新加坡劳工的担忧和恐惧,而且这些焦虑长期笼罩着工友们的生活? 陈振声也在表示,必须为新加坡疫情后的发展规划新的方向。但除了帮助企业适应以外,我们也必须直面体制的问题,包括是否还要继续委派前将领们,打理国家经济?这么做仍凑效,或已不合时宜? 是什么让前将领自居国家领导职务? 为何部队俨然成了未来国家高级领导的重大培育平台?这是需要重新思考并彻底进行改革。 不少人民行动党的成员都有军旅背景,其中包括政务部长陈国明和严晓芳,还有精英阶层的高级政治官员,均未面对过与外籍人士的就业竞争。 除了内阁以外,数十年来,这些将领们一直渗透到人民的生活中,包括人民协会、全国职工总会、行政机构甚至是淡马锡控股等相关组织。 其中一个典型的例子即为前将军伍逸松,在他从部队退役后,加入淡马锡控股,随后还成为东方海皇(Neptune Orient…

MOM: Qualifying salary for Employment Pass applications to be raised from 2017

The Ministry of Manpower announced on 26 July 2016 that the qualifying…

【冠状病毒19】首批莫德纳疫苗抵达狮城

由美国制药公司莫德纳研发的冠病疫苗,首批已在今日(17日)抵达狮城。负责运送疫苗的新航班机SQ7137,从比利时布鲁塞尔装载疫苗上机,并于今日下午1时40分,顺利抵达我国。 疫苗随即运往新翔集团的冷冻仓储中心Coolport储存。莫德纳也是我国批准使用的第二种疫苗。 卫生科学局本月初透过文告宣布,已批准美国药商modena莫德纳(Moderna)开发的冠病疫苗。 该疫苗的效能预计达94巴仙。与目前使用的辉瑞疫苗不同,莫德纳疫苗仅适合18岁及以上人群,两剂间相隔28天。 其副作用则与辉瑞疫苗相似,包括注射部位会疼痛、红肿、疲劳、头痛、肌肉疼痛、发烧、发冷、呕吐以及关节疼痛 卫生部表示,疫苗抵新后,会逐步为18岁及以上人群注射疫苗