International human rights lawyer M Ravi took to his Facebook page today (15 July) to announce that the legal case that he filed on behalf of Suriia Das “to challenge the CPF Board is now being amicably resolved with the Board”.
“We have informed the court at the Pre Trial Conference this morning that the case is being withdrawn. We would like to wish the couple the very best and will pray for recovery,” the lawyer wrote.
Last Wednesday, Mr Ravi revealed that he has filed a case in the High Court for Suriia to allow him to use his CPF savings from his Ordinary and Special accounts for his wife’s medical treatment.

Suriia’s case first gained prominence last week, Monday (8 July), when the lawyer uploaded a video on his personal video channel called RAVIsion highlighting how CPF Board denied the man’s request to allow the CPF savings in his Ordinary and Special accounts to be transferred to his cancer-stricken wife’s (Sarojini Jayapal) Medisave account.
This is so the couple can use the money to pay for further treatment and medical expenses that had occurred as his wife was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2016.
They had to resort to this move because the couple’s Medisave accounts had been completely used up for Sarojini’s medical expenses.
Looking at this situation, Mr Ravi said that this case engages Section 18D of the CPF Act which allows a CPF member (like Suriia) to transfer a portion of his fund from the Ordinary and Special accounts to his loved one’s account. However, there’s a catch here because according to the CPF Board’s policy, the money can only be transferred to someone who is 55 years of age and above.
However, Sarojini is only 47 years old.
Following that, on Friday (12 July), CPF Board responded to this case and revealed the amount of fund paid to her since her diagnosis.
“In sum, arising from Mdm Sarojini’s illness, CPF-allowed insurance schemes have paid out a total of about S$510,000 to date, while S$34,000 has been withdrawn from the CPF accounts of both Mdm Sarojini and Mr Suriia Das,” said the CPF Board.
It also clarified the allegations that the couple was “forced to seek treatment at Parkway Cancer Centre (PCC) and Mount Elizabeth Hospital (MEH) and not the National University Hospital (NUH) because those were the only medical institutions that gave her the hope that she will survive”.
Earlier, Sarojini said that she had chosen to receive her treatment at Mount Elizabeth Hospital instead of at public hospitals, as only the private hospital had given her some reassurance that her condition could improve.
However, the CPF Board did not appear to address the issue raised by Mr Ravi regarding its alleged reluctance to allow his client to withdraw funds from his Ordinary and Special Accounts under such pressing circumstances before Sarojini turns 55, given that Sarojini is suffering from late-stage cancer and is racing against time in terms of obtaining consistent treatment, and that Suriia might be left with no other options in the event that MediFund is insufficient.
Following CPF Board’s response, many netizens slammed the couple as they opined that the duo behaved in an entitled manner since they opted to go to private hospitals and not public ones.
As such, Suriia defended his decision to continue Sarojini’s treatment at MEH, reiterating that only the private hospital had given them some hope that his wife’s condition could improve.
Suriia also continued to demand answers from the CPF Board as to why it has rejected his request to withdraw money from his Ordinary account to fund Sarojini’s treatment, given that her cancer is currently at the advanced metastasis stage and that she is racing against time in her treatment process.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

疑兜售纸巾被阻 轮椅阿叔攻击地铁站员工

疑在阻止在地铁站内售卖纸巾,乘坐电动轮椅的阿叔愤怒地频频用脚踢赶地铁站工作人员,但是最后却跌坐在地上。 有关事件相信发生于11月21日,发生在武吉士地铁站,靠近B出口,通往滨海市区线的通道上。 有网民摄下轮椅大叔攻击地铁站员工的一幕,于周日(16日)分享到社交媒体上,瞬间引起网民纷纷议论。 在脸书群组Fake News – Singapore上,仅有8秒钟的视频帖子写道,“乘坐轮椅的年长者被地铁站工作人员告知,不能在地铁站内招揽和售卖纸巾。但是,年长者却试图用轮椅撞向工作人员,并从轮椅上滑下来。有关视频已经在WhatsApp中流传”。 视频中只见一名大叔坐在轮椅上,朝向身穿白色衬衫的地铁站工作人员逼近,甚至用双脚频频攻击对方,相信是被阻止售卖纸巾而感到不满。相反的,地铁站工作人员则一直退后,甚至举起双手避免触碰到对方。 两人在斜道上“纠缠”,最后卡在墙边,相信是因为用力过猛,导致大叔从轮椅上滑下来。 网民热议孰是孰非 视频吸引了超过6万6000人观看,甚至有211个留言,评论着谁是谁非。 部分网民认为地铁站工作人员不应该干扰这些老人家,他们都是为了赚取一口饭吃,应该睁一只眼闭一只眼。…

Primary 2 Chinese Textbook described late LKY as ‘the Great Gardener’ who build the nation

Facebook page Singaporean Diary on Merlion Island (獅子島上: 新加坡人生活日記) shared a photo…

落实更严厉措施 乐龄活动续停办、娱乐场所关闭

今日(24日),本地新增49起武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病例,多达32人都是返国的公民或长期准证持有者。昨日单日新增病例也创下新高,达到54起,卫生部在文告中认为,这意味着本地抗疫已进入新阶段。 当局指出许多国家已采取“锁国”措施,尽管将对当地人日常起居和经济带来干扰,但有助减缓这些国家医疗系统的压力。 “新加坡不能自满,必须采取更严厉安全疏离措施,最大程度低减少活动和群众接触、减少传播风险。”对此卫生部促请所有国人需认真看待和尽一份力。 跨政府部门抗疫工作小组落实的措施包括,把工作场所和校园外的聚集限制在10人以下、保持一米距离等,并将在本月26日晚11时59分生效,预计将维持至下月30日,若疫情仍未好转将可能延长实施期限。 娱乐场所关闭;购物中心、景区缩小运营 与此同时,所有娱乐场所:戏院、酒吧、夜总会、夜店、剧院和卡拉OK等也将从26日晚起关闭;购物中心、博物馆等景点虽可开放,业者也需缩小运营,确保场所内每16平方米的人群密集度仅一人。 公共场所内的导览等也将取消。若购物中心或景区业者无法遵守,或场所成为疫情传播地点,将被罚款。 尽管餐饮地点仍可开放,不过现场不能出现音乐或卡拉OK等活动,避免人群聚集;同时需确保座位分割至少一米;也要限制客人人数在10人以下。 暂停所有补习中心 政府要求所有补习中心或深广课程暂停,以避免来自不同学校的学生接触。此外,所有宗教活动暂停。至于活动聚会的规定和当局早前的要求一样,所有大型活动需取消,且只允许少于250人的活动。 当局也呼吁国人暂时不去参与一些超过10人的社交活动。 针对乐龄人士的活动,则将展延至4月30日。当局也建议患有慢性病的年长者尽量避免出席社交聚会,只有在必要情况如前往工作或购买日用品时才外出;同时受促保持良好个人卫生习惯。…

Technology-facilitated sexual violence on the rise, says AWARE

There has been an overall rise in cases of technology-facilitated sexual violence…