What’s the fine print when someone wants to renounce their Singaporean citizenship to withdraw his CPF monies?
One Facebook user Muhammad Joe Abdullah earlier pointed out in the group COMPLAINT SINGAPORE that the CPF Board has a rule which states that if a Singaporean citizen or Permanent Resident wants to renounce their citizenship or PR status, they can withdraw their CPF but only if they do not move to West Malaysia. (The post has since been removed)
Effectively, if a citizen or resident wants to leave, they can but they can’t if they decide to settle in West Malaysia.
The CPF withdrawal form for those who want to leave Singapore permanently, will have to agree to the following declaration:

I am not a citizen/permanent resident of Singapore.
I am about to leave/has left Singapore and West Malaysia permanently with no intention of returning for further employment or residence.

Basically, if you want to leave Singapore and take your CPF with you, you have to agree to never return to West Malaysia or Singapore. It specifically says ‘permanently with no intention’.

Does that mean if someone decides to renounce their Singaporean citizenship and move to East Malaysia (Sabah & Sarawak), they would be allowed to? But if they later decided to move to West Malaysia, would the Singapore Government have an avenue to demand that the person return their CPF withdrawal since they are no longer complying with the declaration?
This condition has been in place for a long time now but what is the reason for it? Is it a way for the government to prevent an abuse of the CPF system? To prevent people from taking all their money with them out of Singapore to their geographical rival, Malaysia?
Most importantly, shouldn’t a person be allowed to withdraw their own CPF savings regardless of where they want to move to? It’s their money, after all.
One commenter noted that their sibling was able to move to KL with all his CPF contributions. However, they didn’t specify if their sibling was a Malaysian citizen working in Singapore or even how old they are.
In the case of Malaysian citizens working in Singapore, they are allowed to withdraw their CPF only after the age of 55. They can also make a full withdrawal below the age of 55 but above 50 only if they haven’t worked in Singapore for the past two years.
So the prohibition of moving to West Malaysia with your CPF contribution only applies to Singaporean citizens.
The CPF website also says:

If you are an Ex-Singapore Citizen or Ex-Singapore Permanent Resident returning to obtain Singapore permanent residency or citizenship, you are required to make full refund of the amount withdrawn, including the retrospective interest, to your CPF accounts.

So once you leave, there’s no real way for you to come back to being a Singaporean citizen or PR once you’ve left. You have to pay up if you want to do it.
Maybe it’s one way for the government to make it tougher for Singaporeans to leave and take their money with them to benefit their closest neighbour.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

已故纳吉亲信婆媳争遗产 揭生前拥7亿新元身家

根据马国《当今大马》报导,该国已故前部长丹斯里贾玛鲁丁母亲,向伊斯兰高庭入禀申索儿子遗产,媒体才从而得知,其子财产价值超过21亿令吉(约七亿新元)。 贾玛鲁丁生前任科学工艺部长,也是彭亨云冰区国会议员,不幸在2015年在直升机坠毁事故中丧生。他也被视为前首相纳吉的亲信。 其84岁母亲阿米娜是在今年3月2日,根据1993年伊斯兰行政法律(联邦直辖区)第46(ix)条文下,入禀有关申请。 阿米娜代表律师卡玛埃尼亚指出,贾玛鲁丁也是马国驻美大使,在马来西亚、美国和麦加拥有20个房产和公司。 其中有20亿令吉乃是15家公司股权、其余则包括22项房地产、21个共存有1千500万令吉的银行账户。 根据诉状,贾玛鲁丁在美国拥有一间公寓,在麦加则有一间价值约132万新元的公寓。其余国内资产,则分布在马国彭亨州、霹雳、吉隆坡、薛澜儿、布城和柔佛,其中两项房产个别价值都超过661万新元。 他在纳吉选区北根(Pekan)拥有九栋房屋,在其生前选区云冰则坐拥四栋房屋以及在彭亨关丹的两间房屋。 阿米娜是与贾玛鲁丁遗孀潘斯里卡尔森和四名子女分配遗产。他要求法庭将波士顿的公寓和部分麦加皇家钟楼费尔蒙大厦(Fairmont Makkah)房产下判给他。 根据伊斯兰法,如果死者没立遗嘱,他的母亲可得死者遗产六分之一,而遗孀获得八分之一,子女则获其余遗产。阿米娜则向法庭申请继承五分之一遗产。 贾玛鲁丁生前自1990年开始就担任云冰国会议员,他是在2015年4月4日,在北根出席了纳吉女儿婚宴后,乘搭直升机返回雪兰莪时,不幸遭遇空难,与纳吉机要秘书阿兹林等五名乘客全部罹难。 马国《星报》有关贾玛鲁丁遭遇空难的新闻视频。…

担忧马国政府边界措施再U转 大批马劳越堤回国

听到马国政府宣布,强制要求于本周五起入境该国的所有国民和外籍人士入住隔离中心,今早已有大批马劳从柔佛长堤步行通关回国,一度形成长长人龙。 尽管马来西亚国家天灾管理机构于昨晚(22日)发文宣布,24日起通过陆路从我国入境马国,新马民众都无需强制入住隔离中心,但依旧有大批大马人宁愿越过长堤,步行通关,只为了能够回家。 一些马国客工反映,不少人原本就打算今早返马,加上担心马国政府措施临时U转,才选择在今天越堤入境。 由于许多人纷纷趁今日通关,也导致长堤内出现常常的人龙,从新山苏丹依斯干达关卡、关税及检疫大厦延伸至柔佛长堤,惟在今早10时45分后才人龙才逐渐舒缓。 马国政府昨日(23日)指出,从新山关卡和新马第二通道入境该国的马国公民和新加坡公民,自7月24日起,入境者都无需被强制隔离入住隔离中心。 然而,仍阻止不了许多马劳纷纷回国的心,因为马国政府才在周二宣布,强制要求于本周五起入境该国的所有国民和外籍人士入住隔离中心,不再居家隔离,且入住者还需自行缴付入隔离费用。

Post on controversial flag display hidden from MP’s main page

A controversial post by the Member of Parliament (MP) for Sengkang West…

社论:马善高称不干预租金价格 却默许社企干预小贩营业

环境及水源部长马善高在昨日于国会答复议员询问表示,政府不宜干预小贩摊位的租金价格,那将影响公平竞争。 同时,政府也不宜对生意不好的小贩给予补助,这么做会对那些在健康的市场竞争环境中表现较好的小贩不公平,这也会对附近其他私人经营的食肆不公平。 他表示,市场动力将会为小贩摊位作出公平分配,最终居民将从中受益。 马善高认为,经营模式应该确保租金和成本对小贩是透明和公平的,但不能给予小贩补助,扭曲市场的运作。 不补助小贩免“扭曲市场运作” 他声称,除了执行方面的挑战,社企小贩中心模式整体上是“健全的”,食物价格维持在可负担水平,为顾客提供各式高质量的食物选择,价格一般比邻近的咖啡店和食阁便宜。 “大部分的摊贩的生意也不错,不能让这些成就功亏一篑。政府有在搜集意见,调整模式,为国人改善服务。” 依马善高高见,应让市场“自由竞争”,让市场“看不见的手”自然调节,小贩也算是企业家,也需面对竞争和挑战等风险。 马善高之见,有一半是对的,但是高举“自由贸易”的大旗,至今以来都还是存在争议,在国际平台,强国就很喜欢高谈自由竞争,因为自由贸易主张消除所有限制和阻碍。反之,小国对自由贸易有所保留乃至小心翼翼,深恐财大气粗的强国以更雄厚实力,变相侵蚀掉弱国的财富。 强势社企VS弱势小贩 马善高真的理解,小贩有被放到一个公平的竞争平台去“自由竞争”吗? 如果小贩是自由的企业家,那等同小贩自己就是老板,是老板的话,…