While speaking in Parliament on Monday (8 July), Transport Minister Khaw Boon Wan revealed that the Government is currently subsidising more than 30% of public transport operations, and it would not be sustainable to continue this practice of relying on government subsidies to fund public transport infrastructure.
He said that the total cost of running the rail network has increased by around S$270 million between 2016 and 2017, adding that the rail companies are “operating at a loss”, as the fares paid by commuters do no cover operating costs.
SMRT Trains, he added, incurred a loss of S$86 million, while SBS Transit’s train division also lost tens of millions of dollars, as seen in the latest reported financial year.
If that is not all, Mr Khaw also highlighted that the Government has spent “around S$1.9 billion to take over ownership of all rail operating assets”.
Although the S$1.9 billion is a one-time expense, the Government is also responsible for the “proper and timely renewal” of these assets, which is “a huge and continuing financial liability”, said Mr Khaw.
As such, the Transport Minister stressed that Government subsidies given out “have exceeded their intended scope of funding the civil infrastructure and the first set of operating assets”.
“With intensified maintenance to reach the current level of reliability, the Government operating subsidies have increased further. Over the next 5 years, the Government expects to spend S$4.5 billion on operating subsidies, so this is nearly S$1 billion a year. And this will be on top of the government spending of S$25 billion on civil infrastructure, to build and to equip new lines,” he explained.
Having said that, although Mr Khaw did not openly say that the fares will go up, he hinted that higher fares would be necessary to keep Government subsidies in check in order to avoid further losses.
He also added that the Government will continue to operate under the current Public Transport Council (PTC) fare formula, which is valid till 2023. “But we must have the discipline to implement the formula fully, as we adjust fares over the next four years,” he said.
He added, “In due course, the PTC will need to review the fare adjustment mechanism to reflect the increased operating cost to support the intensified maintenance, and the additional operating subsidies from the Government to the MRT system.”
Mr Khaw also mentioned the system will have to be funded by either taxpayers or commuters, and “we’ve just got to find that balance”.
After a video of Mr Khaw speaking regarding this in Parliament was posted on TOC’s Facebook page, netizens slammed him for hinting that the fares may go up. They said that it’s the Government’s job to serve the public, and public transportation is something that the citizens paid for via their taxes so the Government should do everything in their power to give the best. Some mentioned that “public transport system globally have rarely be profitable”, so subsidies are an integral part in providing efficient and affordable public transportation.
Others asked why are the funds collected in road taxes, COEs, PARFs, parking fees and others not enough to cover public transportation’s cost.
 
A bunch of online users also said that it’s “ridiculous” for the Government to say that they don’t have enough money to provide subsidies and asking “suffering commuters” to pay for it. This is because the Government is still paying high salaries to the top management and Ministers, which is why it’s puzzling for them to now tell that they are running at a loss.

Facebook user Alex Zwm said that the people “need accountability to the actual expenses of the costs of running the public transport system”. He said instead of the Government saying that they must increase prices because of rising costs, these companies should “be subjected to public scrutiny of their costs since tax payer monies are being used to subsidize the overall costs”.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Changi Airport Terminal 5 project to continue but paused for at least two years due to “great uncertainties” amid COVID-19

The construction of Changi Airport Terminal 5 will be paused for at…

感谢各位读者支持

各位网络公民的读者们好, 本社在日前公布,为了应付选举期间的运营开销,本社将在7月6日(星期六),傍晚6时30分至9时,在新置地大厦(Singapore Land Tower)第45层顶层阁楼,举办募款晚宴。 感谢各位读者厚爱,消息宣布后有许多热心群众和支持者联系我们,并表示尽管无法出席7月6日的晚宴,但很乐意捐款支持。 为了能筹募资金,我们再次展开募款活动,我们也预计选举很可能在未来几个月内举行。 而群众们的善款,将用于支持本社英语和中文独立新闻网站的运营,希望能藉此继续为读者们提供独立、主流媒体忽略的报导和视野。 如仍有善长仁翁有意捐献,您可选择通过银行转帐到我们以下任何一个账户: Maybank 户口:04011108619 Paynow账户: 201543138DTOC…

Health consultant criticises Gan for taking another 2 years to review Medishield Life claim limits

Four years ago in Jan 2015 when Health Minister Gan Kim Yong…

金管局:网传不实消息 对为狮城贡献外籍人士不公平

新加坡金融管理局强调,散播有关金融机构招聘做法的不实消息,并没有好处,也对那些来本地工作、为狮城作出贡献的外籍人士不公平。 在疫情冲击下,国人担忧裁员、对本地就业前景的忧虑浮现,加上本月初人力部揭发,人力部揭发47雇主招聘员工未公平对待新加坡人,坊间对于建设新加坡专才核心劳动力的呼声更高。 然而,金管局回应《海峡时报》时却指出,网络社交媒体上的一些说法是不实的!也对特定背景的雇员产生猜忌。 金管局强调,国人提起金融领域中国人就业的问题,当局都有聆听,然而部分人士散播假消息,无助人们进行知情讨论,更何况这些说法,对于相关金融机构,以及那些为新加坡贡献的外籍人士都是不公平的。 其中一则贴文分享照片,声称是在新加坡的星展银行办公处,一群非新加坡雇员和该银行总裁高博德(Piyush Gupta)合摄;以及另一张照片声称在樟宜商业园的星展银行信息科技部门。 惟星展银行早前解释,实则第一张照片,是在2017年9月,是星展银行在印度孟买开设办公处的合照;第二张也是年前在印度的海得拉巴(Hyderabad)的合照。 金管局解释,整体而言,在金融领域国人的就业情况相当正面,金融领域10份职业中有七人都是新加坡人担纲。 该局也持续与金融机构合作,培养强大的新加坡核心劳动力,只是目前需要做得更多,为日国人创造更多就业机会。 金管局需回应退休银行家的言论 然而,早前就已有一位退休银行家揭露一些大型、老牌外籍银行,倾向雇用外籍人士、排挤新加坡人才,“已是业界熟知之事”,并呼吁当局应严密审查金融领域的这种现象。 尽管金管局局长孟文能认真看待,惟他也透露,在银行领域方面,43巴仙高管都是本地人。这是否意味着,另外57巴仙高管都是外籍人士?…