Silk Air with New Boeing 737-8MAX was flying pass changi business park before landing on the airport (Photo by Komenton from Shutterstock.com).

Through an investigative journalism work, Bloomberg published an article today (‘Boeing’s 737 Max Software Outsourced to $9-an-Hour Engineers‘, 29 Jun) establishing that the Boeing’s 737 Max software had been outsourced to Indian software engineers working for only US$9 an hour in India, compared with US$35 to $40 for those in the U.S. on H1B visa or more for a full-time US software engineer.

Bloomberg also found that Boeing’s subcontractors and suppliers were also outsourcing software work to India, in order to keep the cost down and to maximize profits.

Longtime Boeing engineers whom Bloomberg spoke to, revealed that the problematic Max software which was plagued by issues, was developed at a time Boeing was laying off experienced engineers and pressing suppliers to cut costs. Hence, there was a push to outsource work to lower-paid contractors. This led to the reliance on temporary workers making as little as US$9 an hour to develop and test software, often from countries lacking a deep background in aerospace – notably India.

Two Indian software companies were found by Bloomberg to be linked to the Max software development – HCL and Cyient (formerly known as Infotech). The coders from HCL were typically designing to specifications set by Boeing, said a former Boeing software engineer. Still, “it was controversial because it was far less efficient than Boeing engineers just writing the code,” he said. Frequently, “it took many rounds going back and forth because the code was not done correctly,” he recalled.

Another former Boeing engineer, a flight controls developer who was laid off in 2017, told Bloomberg, “Boeing was doing all kinds of things, everything you can imagine, to reduce cost, including moving work from Puget Sound, because we’d become very expensive here. All that’s very understandable if you think of it from a business perspective. Slowly over time it appears that’s eroded the ability for Puget Sound designers to design.”

Outsourcing has long been a sore point for Boeing engineers, who, in addition to fearing job losses say it has led to communications issues and mistakes.

Boeing: HCL and Cyient not involved

In response to Bloomberg’s enquiry, Boeing said that it did not rely on engineers from HCL and Cyient “for the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System”, which has been linked to the Lion Air crash last October and the Ethiopian Airlines disaster in March, both involving the 737 Max planes. Boeing claimed it didn’t rely on either firm for another software issue disclosed after the crashes: a cockpit warning light that wasn’t working for most buyers.

“Boeing has many decades of experience working with supplier/partners around the world,” Boeing said. “Our primary focus is on always ensuring that our products and services are safe, of the highest quality and comply with all applicable regulations.”

In a statement, HCL added that it “has a strong and long-standing business relationship with The Boeing Company, and we take pride in the work we do for all our customers. However, HCL does not comment on specific work we do for our customers. HCL is not associated with any ongoing issues with 737 Max.”

HCL linked to Max’s flight-display software

However, investigations from Bloomberg revealed that, based on resumes posted on social media, HCL engineers had helped develop and test the Max’s flight-display software, while employees from Cyient handled software for flight-test equipment.

In one post, an HCL employee summarized his duties with a reference to the now-infamous 737 Max model, which started flight tests in January 2016, “Provided quick workaround to resolve production issue which resulted in not delaying flight test of 737-Max (delay in each flight test will cost very big amount for Boeing).”

Also, Bloomberg found out that a Boeing’s subcontractor, Rockwell Collins, which makes cockpit electronics, had been outsourcing significant work to India. By 2010, HCL employed more than 400 people at design, development and verification centers for Rockwell Collins in Chennai and Bangalore.

That same year, Boeing opened what it called a “center of excellence” with HCL in Chennai, saying the companies would partner “to create software critical for flight test.”

Rockwell Collins won the Max contract for cockpit displays, and it has relied in part on HCL engineers in India as well as those in the U.S. on H1B visa. Then, contract engineers from Cyient helped test the flight test equipment.

With regard to the 2 crashes, federal investigators suspected that the 737 Max MCAS system pushed the planes into uncontrollable dives because of bad data from a single sensor. That design violated basic principles of redundancy for generations of Boeing engineers, and the company apparently never tested to see how the software would respond, sources told Bloomberg.

Boeing also has disclosed that it learned soon after Max deliveries began in 2017 that a warning light that might have alerted crews to the issue with the sensor wasn’t installed correctly in the cockpit flight-display software.

Singapore’s SGX outsources to HCL too

In 2010, the Singapore Exchange (SGX) and HCL signed a five-year IT infrastructure outsourcing agreement worth S$110 million.

Under the agreement, HCL provided SGX with infrastructure support and management services including the exchange’s Reach initiative. The S$250 million Reach initiative was aimed to create the “world’s fastest trading engine, establish a state-of-the-art data centre” offering co-location facilities and seamlessly connect trading communities in global financial hubs to Singapore.

HCL said its architecture for SGX is powered by a dynamic two-pronged strategy comprising ‘Change the Business’ and ‘Run the Business’ services.

Then Mr Bob Caisley, EVP and CIO at SGX said, “HCL is an important partner for SGX in enabling the Reach initiative to provide customers with the fastest access to Asia, and in enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of our operations on a daily basis. The implementation of Reach will ensure that SGX’s position as a leading listing venue for international issuers and the unparalleled trading venue for Asian products is fortified and future-proofed.”

Mr Kiran Bhagwanani of HCL said, “It is our privilege to be associated with SGX as it continues to improve its customer offerings. Our aim is to enable transformation of data centre and network operations at SGX to bring in enhanced efficiency and clear business benefits.”

Five years later in 2015, Bob Caisley quietly left SGX. His departure came after SGX suffered 2 serious trading disruptions late in 2014 and was rebuked by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (‘MAS raps SGX for market outage lapses‘).

The outages were said to have been caused by a software error and a power failure as SGX grappled with falling trading volume.

Meanwhile, under India–Singapore Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA), Singapore welcomes Indian software companies to “invest” in Singapore even though they mostly employ their own Indian software engineers from India. The engineers can be transferred to work in Singapore easily under the inter-company transfer arrangements agreed in CECA without the need for market testing.

HCL development centre in Singapore is currently located at Jurong Gateway area:

HCL Singapore Pte Ltd (Development Centre)
31 International Business Park, #05-02,
Creative Resource Building

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore on alert after 6 suspects arrested in Batam over rockets plot

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said this afternoon (5 August) that…

政府引防假消息法 反对党人毕博渊成“被纠正”第一人

相信新加坡前进党党员毕博渊(Brad Bowyer),成为首位被政府《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA),要求更正网络贴文的人士。 根据政府官网Factually在今日(25日),发文指毕博渊的贴文含有“误导内容”,包括指政府参与淡马锡和政府投资公司(GIC)的投资决策、以及近期印度安得拉邦阿玛拉瓦提项目告吹,存有不实的数据。 对此,上述官网则指淡马锡和GIC的决策由个别管理团队负责,政府没有干预或影响;澄清声明也指淡马锡还获得了穆迪投资者服务公司(Moody’s Investors Service)的Aaa评级和标普全球评级(S&P Global Ratings)的AAA级;每年都有公布财报,仍审慎处理投资事务。 至于毕博渊也在今日发文解释,自己已尽力根据公开的事实,自己所能取得的资料,去作出公允的评论;对于被要求更正消息自己也不认为有问题,因为他认为当涉及公共利益,厘清事实是有必要的。 他表示,尽管自己曾对防假消息法提出质疑,不过大家都被现今政府保证该法不会被滥用,且未来的附例也能填补漏洞,不过他仍认为经过更广泛的辩论和评估,可以推出更周全的立法。 不过,毕博渊表示自己不受有关纠正要求影响,且坚称“负责任”和发声公民,对于民主国家以及负责任和懂得倾听的政府,同样重要。 至于毕博渊被要求更正的贴文,必须附加注明:此贴文含有不实消息,更正消息请点击 www.gov.sg/…/clarifications-on-falsehoods-posted-by-mr-brad…

“欠费是大人和教育部之间问题” 家长吁孩子不应为此受责难

社运份子吴家和在一项论坛上直言,因家长欠费就扣押成绩单,教育部的这项政策“非常不妥”;也有两名父母和众多捐款民众发言,分享他们对有关政策的不满,甚至认为此政策形同为社会“分阶级”。 吴家和是于12月21日,在泖生活馆(Mahota Activity Studio)举办论坛的活动上,如是指出。有关论坛获得约30人出席,其中包括受到有关政策影响的一些清寒父母,以及参与众筹活动替学生缴清学杂费的善心人士。 幼时被告知欠费,学前教师当场哭出来 论坛上除了吴家和,还有一名已育有三名子女的学前教育老师,达如格(Tharuga)。她分享到在1994年,还是12岁的她在面对有关政策时的处境。她表示,因为面对一些问题,当时其父母在连续数个月都无法成功转账缴付其学费。因此在领取成绩单当天,她被带到一个特殊柜台前,对她说到因为还有学费未还清,因此无法领取成绩单。 达如格追忆说,她听后当场就哭出来了,且还不是很清楚到底发生了什么事。她随后追问母亲有关事项,母亲立刻在当场付款,并且责骂柜台的女职员。 这可说明,有关政策已至少存在25年了。 嫁人后,达如格之前都在家带孩子,一直到身为家中顶梁柱的丈夫生病住院了数个月。当时的她,除了要照顾丈夫、支付医院账单、抚养着18个月大的孩子,肚子还有一个小生命,更需要照顾生病的母亲。 她表示,在紧急剖腹产分娩的三天后,就是大女儿领取小六考试成绩单的日子,她唯有强迫自己在手术当天出院,以便能够陪同女儿到学校领取成绩单。她表示,当时无法缴交全部欠款,只支付了50元,也告知校方会在年底付清欠额。 不满校方因此困扰孩子 害怕女儿面对自己之前的状况,达如格主动询问职员是否会扣押女儿的成绩单时,对方表示不会。…

Chan Chun Sing: Govt to consider appeals from returning fast lane travellers for swab test in place of SHN

The Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI) is prepared to consider appeals…