Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) logo signage on the building at entrance (Photo by mimisim from Shutterstock.com)

The “complementarity” between Hong Kong and Singapore as Asia’s prime financial hubs – despite popular perception of the two cities being fierce competitors – may signal trouble for the latter, as denizens of the Chinese special administrative region continue to push for the complete withdrawal of the controversial extradition Bill, said the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)’s managing director Ravi Menon.

Speaking to reporters at a briefing on MAS’ annual report in its Shenton Way headquarters yesterday (27 Jun), Mr Menon also revealed that despite media reports indicating high net worth Hong Kongers moving their assets to various locations abroad, including to Singapore, he has not observed any significant financial changes here with regards to the purported move.

In dispelling the commonly held view that the financial and economic relationship between Hong Kong and Singapore is characterised primarily by stiff competition, Mr Menon was quoted by TODAY as saying: “Both Hong Kong and Singapore are very attractive financial centres with unique strands and business propositions.”

He added that Singapore has also “built our value proposition through sound regulation, a predictable and facilitative business environment, and being at the heart of a very thriving and dynamic South-east Asia”.

Nonetheless, the civil unrest in Hong Kong over the extradition Bill and Chief Executive Carrie Lam’s leadership coupled with the looming US-China trade war may negatively affect economic outcomes in the rest of Asia, and Singapore will not be exempt from such outcomes, said Mr Menon.

Concerns were raised over the scope of powers that will be granted upon certain jurisdictions Hong Kong decides to extradite crime suspects to – particularly mainland China – should the amendment bill be passed, as certain factions remain sceptical of Beijing’s capacity to refrain from abusing the extradition arrangements.

Amnesty International warned that the proposed legislation “would extend the ability of the mainland authorities to target critics, human rights activists, journalists, NGO workers and anyone else in Hong Kong”.

Raymond Chan Chi-chuen of the pro-democracy party People Power told SCMP that while a delay may be helpful in the short term, “it will not work, as long as they don’t retract the bill”.

“People are ready for further action,” said Chan.

Founding chairman of the opposition Democratic Party and senior politician Martin Lee told Bloomberg last Fri that the extradition Bill is “a thoroughly bad idea”, adding that “Hong Kong people can only continue to demonstrate, and I hope peacefully, so that the world, the rest of the world, will speak up for us”.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Jarrod Luo resigns from SDP

~by: Cheong Yaoming and Ng Yi Shu~ Jarrod Luo Singapore Democratic Party's (SDP) candidate for…

Local LGBT community rallies support for prosecuted LGBTs in Russia

On Saturday, IndigNation organized an event held at the Hong Lim park…

年轻世代政治醒觉 阮健平:执政党外涌现更有素质候选人

刚刚过去的第14届国会选举,无疑是本土政治上的分水岭,执政最久的人民行动党政府仅获得61.2巴仙的总得票率,比起上届跌了8.62巴仙。其中工人党还成功拿下新的集选区,一口气把议席增至10个。 对于选举成果,前进党成员、曾上阵蔡厝港集选区的阮健平表示,欣慰该党协助本地政治版图开拓新曙光,更强调可靠替代政党须留下来继续深耕,且能够更上一层楼。 他也分析,此次选举也显示,在执政党以外,也涌现许多更有素质的候选人,并相信在年轻世代醒觉和关注政治下,这将成为未来趋势,国家也能从中得益。 前进党方面也有不少人申请加入,阮健平相信这能为下届选举打造更多新人才。 “这令人振奋,就像置身在一家充满潜能的初创企业中,我的肾上腺素也在激荡。”  

对耶鲁-国大校方指控 亚菲言脸书打破沉默

上月中旬,耶鲁—国大学院宣布临时取消一门名为《新加坡的异议与抵抗》的课程。而根据最近美国耶鲁大学总校的调查,则指出耶鲁-国大校方的取消课程决定,没有受到政府干预,且考虑到学术要求和法律问题。 根据调查报告,耶鲁-国大学院课程委员会,在五月底对负责课程的新加坡知名剧作家亚菲言(Alfian Sa’at),提出带外籍学生到芳林公园“模拟”示威可能触法,要求他修改教程。但根据他们说法,他们未能联系上亚菲言,后者则表示未获清楚指示。 耶鲁—国大学院校长陈大荣教授解释,课程“未批判性地接触多元观点,这对于探讨围绕在异议周边的政治、社会和伦理议题,去做作妥当的学术检视是需要的”。 虽然课程被喊停,不过Singapore Matters 脸书专页,制作成视频抨击有关课程,指该课程有意鼓励学生进行示威运动,尤其宣传暴力示威。此前亚菲言已解释,当初该课程设计,旨在引导学生从不同角度思考新加坡的抗议行动,例如抗议的意义、以及为何媒体需要将抗议组织或人士设定为“麻烦者”、他们又是为谁制造了麻烦,并非如视频中说的教导学生如何组织公共示威,并指控将课程与香港的政治动荡画上等号是不符合他当初的意愿。 然而针对校方和外界近期的论述,亚菲言打破沉默,在个人脸书有感而发,直言自己绝不喜欢当“代罪羔羊”。 “要把艺术家看作“麻烦制造者”很容易,也是很便利的论述。当然一所学术机构理应被信赖,更何况是一座博雅(liberal arts)学府。” 原相信校方能透明、专业处理 他说他已经尽量保持克制,也婉拒了媒体采访,因为他相信耶鲁-国大学院能透明、专业地处理此事。当校方和职员召开会议和对话也没邀请他,自己也没提出异议,还天真地以为这算是展示“绅士风度”。…