Thousands of people attend the 2017 People’s Climate March in Washington DC to stand up against climate change. (Image by Nicole S Glass)

Climate change will have the greatest impact on those living in poverty while also threatening democracy and human rights, according to the UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights.

The expert, Philip Alston said  in a report by the UN Human Rights Council (UNHCR), “Even if current targets are met, tens of millions will be impoverished, leading to widespread displacement and hunger.”

“Climate change threatens to undo the last 50 years of progress in development, global health, and poverty reduction,” Alston said. “It could push more than 120 million more people into poverty by 2030 and will have the most severe impact in poor countries, regions, and the places poor people live and work.”

The best-case – and unrealistic – scenario of increase in global temperature of 1.5°C by 2100 will see extreme temperatures in many regions, leaving disadvantaged populations with food insecurity, loss of income, and worsening health. Many will have to choose between starvation and migration, says the UNHCR.

Alton said that while people in poverty are responsible for just a fraction of global emissions, they will bear the brunt of climate change and have the least capacity to protect themselves.

“We risk a ‘climate apartheid’ scenario where the wealthy pay to escape overheating, hunger, and conflict while the rest of the world is left to suffer,” added the expert.

What’s more, climate change will dramatically affect the rights to life, food, housing and water but this concern has been largely neglected according to the report. Equally important is the impact of global warming on democracy as governments struggle to manage the consequences and persuade their people to accept the major social and economic transformations required to properly deal with the issue.

“In such a setting, civil and political rights will be highly vulnerable,” the Special Rapporteur said.

“Most human rights bodies have barely begun to grapple with what climate change portends for human rights, and it remains one on a long laundry list of ‘issues’, despite the extraordinarily short time to avoid catastrophic consequences,” Alston explained.

“As a full-blown crisis that threatens the human rights of vast numbers of people bears down, the usual piecemeal, issue-by-issue human rights methodology is woefully insufficient.”

Sombre speeches by government officials at regular conferences are not leading to meaningful action. “States have marched past every scientific warning and threshold, and what was once considered catastrophic warming now seems like a best-case scenario,” Alston said. “Even today, too many countries are taking short-sighted steps in the wrong direction.”

Countries are still failing to meet event their current inadequate commitments to reduce carbon emissions and provide climate financing, while continuing to subsidise the fossil fuel industry to the tune of $5.2 trillion per year, says the UNHCR.

“Maintaining the current course is a recipe for economic catastrophe,” Alston said. “Economic prosperity and environmental sustainability are fully compatible but require decoupling economic well-being and poverty reduction from fossil fuel emissions.”

To do this, robust policies are required at the local level to support displaced workers and ensure quality jobs, suggest the report.

“A robust social safety net will be the best response to the unavoidable harms that climate change will bring,” Alston said. “This crisis should be a catalyst for states to fulfil long ignored and overlooked economic and social rights, including to social security and access to food, healthcare, shelter, and decent work.”

While some have turned to the private sector for solutions, an overreliance on for-profit efforts would nearly guarantee massive human rights violations, warned Alston, with the wealthy catered to and the poorest left behind.

“If climate change is used to justify business-friendly policies and widespread privatisation, exploitation of natural resources and global warming may be accelerated rather than prevented,” he said.

“There is no shortage of alarm bells ringing over climate change, and an increase in biblical-level extreme weather events appear to be finally piercing through the noise, misinformation, and complacency, but these positive signs are no reason for contentment,” Alston said. “A reckoning with the scale of the change that is needed is just the first step.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

TOC Op-ed: Awake, Jim Sleeper

By Choo Zheng Xi/ Consultant Editor Yale lecturer Jim Sleeper’s provocatively titled…

SG High Commissioner seeks mercy from new Indian state govt after SG plonks $4B into state

Last month, it was reported that the joint venture project between Singapore…

国大本月落实加重惩罚新框架 如何重获学生、受害者信任?

新加坡国立大学此前饱受宿舍偷拍事件困扰,学生们人心惶惶。为了杜绝这些违法行为,该大学自本月起,落实对性相关不当行为加重惩罚的新框架,且即日生效。 但是,专业辅导员则提醒该大学,必须确保提供受害者所需要的支援,重新获得学生的信任。 国大检讨性相关不当行为纪律处分框架委员会,提出有关的新惩罚,其中包括了至少停学一年,且记录在毕业成绩册中,毕业三年后才能够消除;如果屡次犯案或触碰到受害者私处等严重行为,犯案者将立即被开除。 10建议三个月分阶段落实 国大校长陈永财教授昨天做出宣布,该委员会于周一公布的10大建议将在接下来的三个月,分阶段落实。 他也向学生、职员和校友发出通知电邮。 同时,从本月起,国大将为第一时间提供支援的人员,提供培训,包括保安和宿舍人员。 校园的所有保安措施也将在今年内,逐步到位。 校方本月将增设不少于300台闭路电视,并且为宿舍厕所的门锁换新,还有增加宿舍保安人数和校园巡逻次数。 除此之外,校方也将于10月前,为宿舍和体育设施内,超过860件浴室隔间安装上方或门下的隔板。 设受害者关怀组 而将于下个月生效的新纪律程序会,将给予受害者更大的权益,包括为受害者及时提供事件调查进展,并让受害者在特殊情况下,能够要求纪律委员会或纪律上诉委员会重新审查结果。有关的特殊情况包括了事后有新证据出现等。…

马国资源部:柔佛设新滤水厂 三年后不再依赖我国水供

马来西亚水务、土地及天然资源部长西维尔再也古玛声称,预计自2022年开始,柔佛州将无需再依赖新加坡的净水供应。 “我们必须确保柔佛在不依赖新加坡进口的情况下,拥有足够的净水,这就是为什么我们需要为柔佛州提供新的滤水厂。” “滤水生产量必须达到每天260百万公升(MLD)。在2022年,我们能够达到这个要求。” 据《马新社》报导,西维尔周一(8月19日)在柔佛州,与该州州务大臣拿督萨鲁丁嘉玛开会后,在记者会上如是说道。 不影响目前水供协议 当被询及有关的变动是否会影响马国和新加坡的水供协议时,西维尔表示这并不会带来任何影响,协议仍然有效。 根据目前的水供协议,我国以每1000加仑3仙(新加坡1分)的价格,向马来西亚购买生水。相对的,马国则以每1000加仑50仙的价格,向新加坡购买经过处理的净水。 另外,西维尔指出,该部门已经与柔佛州政府达成协议,通过有效地管理污水和废物,以便解决该州的河流污染问题。 “我们双方还就森林永续管理部分达成一致协议,尤其是在涉及维护作为国家财产的永久森林保护区部分,将森林保护区纳入国家遗产保护范围。”