At an international Ministerial Conference on Diabetes in Nov last year, the Coordinating Minister for Social Policies Tharman Shanmugaratnam said that war on diabetes has to be waged on multiple fronts (‘Diabetes must be fought on multiple fronts: Tharman‘, 27 Nov 2018).

He said that employers, citizens and the whole of government need to chip in to fight a condition that not only compromised an individual’s quality of life, but was also a huge drain on national resources.

“It has been estimated that the global annual healthcare expenditure on diabetes was over US$700 billion (S$961 billion) in 2017,” said Tharman. Today, almost half a million of Singaporeans are already living with the disease.

The only way to keep the disease at bay is to change mindsets across the board, with a sustained effort at putting out information on the health risks of diabetes, said Tharman.

“The pleasures of a slice of chocolate cake are immediate, while the costs to health are hidden and set in much later, but with potentially severe consequences,” he said. Parents could also play a critical part in teaching children to eat healthy, he added.

At the conference, World Health Organisation director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus also said that the essential first step in fighting diabetes is “prevention, prevention, prevention”.

Tharman said that the effort to fight diabetes could not be confined to health ministries. “The levers or influences that governments have go well beyond the healthcare sector,” he said.

That is why, in Singapore, the food and beverage sector had been persuaded to switch to healthier ingredients, with almost half the hawker stalls offering at least one healthier option last year. More water dispensers were also being installed at hawker centres to encourage people to drink plain water instead of sugary drinks.

It has also been reported that Singapore is currently examining the idea of implementing a sugar tax in Singapore.

Minister says one thing, MP does another

While the ruling PAP government is telling Singaporeans through Minister Tharman that diabetes must be fought on multiple fronts with mindset changes across the board, PAP MP Melvin Yong was dishing out free chocolate bars to many elderly residents at the Pek Kio market yesterday (16 Jun) in “celebration” of Father’s Day.

Yong’s “generosity” came to light when residents mistakenly saw the expiry date on some of the chocolate bars. Photos of the said bars quickly spread online.

Yong then took to the social media in the evening accusing people of spreading falsehoods in social media. He noted that the claim was untrue as the date shown on the packaging clearly shows that the chocolate bars only expire in 2020 instead of the alleged 2011 date.

“It has come to my attention that someone has deliberately circulated a falsehood following our Father’s Day walkabout this morning,” Yong said. “The social media post and Whatsapp message falsely allege that the chocolate given out by our PAP activists at Pek Kio Market had expired in January 2011.”

“The photo that accompanied the false claim clearly shows that the expiry date on the chocolate wrapper is 9 January 2020. The wrapper also indicates that the format for the BEST BEFORE date is ‘DD/MM/YY’ (e.g. 09/01/20),” he added.

However, what is interesting is that on the chocolate bar wrappers, a PAP logo with his name was pasted on it, sending the message that the free chocolate bars actually come from Singapore’s ruling party, the PAP.

It then begs the question if eating chocolates is the new way of fighting diabetes by the PAP government.

Perhaps MP Yong was thinking that the “pleasures” of a chocolate bar are immediate but with no costs to health nor consequences?

Note that many residents living in Pek Kio are elderly.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

为辩论贸易课题 中美主播隔空“舌战”

美国霍士财经频道女主播翠西(Trish Regan),于今早八时邀请中国环球电视网(CGTN)女主播刘欣作为其节目《黄金时间》嘉宾,针对中美贸易战课题展开公开辩论。 翠西一开始说明,这是难得的机会,让美国观众在此课题上聆听不同的观点,翠西表示自己不代表美国政府,而其“辩论对手”则代表中国共产党,惟她在节目中愿意欢迎各种异议。 刘欣一开始则澄清,本身并非中国共产党员,不应假定她是为中国政府说话,而她是作为一名中国环球电视网记者与特里斯对话。不过翠西则嘀咕说其实CGTN也是共产党的一部分。 翠西首先询问刘欣意见,即中美之间有没有可能达成协议,对此刘欣称自己没有内部消息,所以不清楚中美贸易谈判会有往哪进展,但认为中国政府已经非常明确地表明立场,除非美方也对中国谈判团表达尊重,愿意谈判而不是利用外部施压,那么协议还可能达成,否则恐怕对立还会持续。 翠西则回应自己也不认为贸易战对谁会有好处,“我真的希望可以解决,”但她也抛出知识产权问题,也列举出一些中国企业盗窃知识产权的例子。他说美国企业可能投入钜资、耗费十几年才研发成功,又如何让他们承担在中国概念、研究被盗窃的风险。 刘欣则回应,翠西可访问那些到中国营业的美企他们的看法,“但据我了解他们当中许多都盈利颇丰,而且大部分也愿意继续投资在中国,然而川普政府却让前景增添不确定。” 刘欣不否认又出现盗窃知识产权、商业机密的问题,但中国政府和人民对于知识产权保护是有共识的;再者,盗窃产权问题在各国都有,在美国也有企业相互诉讼对方盗版,不能以偏概全。 当翠西问道有关华为是否愿意与美国共享它的先进技术,刘欣认为若双方互惠互利、相互学习,照规矩付费是没问题的,中美都在彼此学习。“我们可以互惠互利,就我个人而言,我学习英文,因为我有一个美国的老师,我跟美国的朋友去学。” 翠西:何时中国才会停止跟世界银行借钱 接下来翠西再抛出一个辛辣问题,她指中国已然是全球第二大经济体,但何时才肯放下发展中国家身份,不再向世界银行借钱? 刘欣则回应:“我们也想壮大,不想被一直看扁成侏儒、贫穷国家,但视你如何定义发展中国家,中国有14亿人口,是美国的三倍,人均GDP还不到美国的六分之一,甚至还不如欧洲一些发达国家。”…

后港市镇会落实邻里更新计划 行动党前候选人“邀功”居民困惑

本月15日,工人党后港选区议员方荣发在脸书发文,表示其选区市镇理事会(TC)积极落实邻里更新计划(Neighbourhood Renewal Programme (NRP)),但是居民却收到和人民行动党前候选人李宏壮有关的宣传资料。 这令居民感到困惑,究竟后港选区的邻里更新计划由谁落实?毕竟后港的市镇会是由工人党管理。 对此方荣发提到,在2016年武吉巴督补选,行动党曾指出,如果候选人没有获得人民委托当选议员,那么他和他的政党也无法接管市镇会,也不能去进行上述计划。而市镇会在向政府申请拨款时可决定那些社区优先落实该计划。 当时,行动党补选候选人穆仁理也表示,邻里更新计划是由武吉巴督居民投选的代议士,所领导的市镇会执行。 方荣发更补充,即便是建屋发展局的官网,也有提及邻里更新计划是由市镇会进行。 于是一些后港居民质问,何以败选的行动党候选人,即没有领导市镇会,可以声言或暗示他参与邻里更新计划? 方荣发也问道:“行动党是否食言?还是这位候选人有所误解?如果行动党候选人即使没当选也可进行邻里更新计划,那么为何行动党在2016年武吉巴督补选时误导选民?” 他也强调,他自2012年以来就得到后港居民委托,管理市镇会,也会继续落实提升计划,但肯定不会参杂一些误导、分裂或混淆社区的政治套话。 在2016年,在武吉巴督补选中,穆仁理还宣布了总值190万新元的基础设施计划,但前提是他获得选民委托。…

Amnesty International – Fair hearing to migrants facing deportation over riot

Statement from Amnesty International – Singapore must give fair hearing to migrants facing…

调查显示 国人对国内生活成本最不满意

调查显示,本国人对政府最不满意的部分为国内生活成本,但对国家安全以及犯罪水平则是最满意的。 该调查是根据研究机构黑箱研究(Black Box Research)所进行的2019年11月份政府满意度指数(GSI)分析,于12月13日公布。 据调查显示,其中最让国人满意的国家安全与犯罪水平指数,达94巴仙至96巴仙的满意程度,即指国人能够安心地在土地上生活,不需要为治安问题忧虑。而最让国人不满意的则是国内生活水平,与上个月持相同水平,仅达57巴仙。 而整体的满意程度,自2019年1月以来,则维持在80分左右。 调查指出,自10月以来,政府的个别指项满意度调查均有所下降,例如国家安全、种族关系、环境、经济、政府问责、与人口管理。其中以经济的下滑幅度最为明显,而经济通常与国人的生活满意度挂钩。 生活品质与个人财务挂钩,半数人不满意目前生活状态 安盛保险公司日前就发表安盛更美好生活指数的调查指出,国人认为美好生活与个人财务的多寡有所相关,即指财务的多寡成就目标的实现。然而,调查却发现,仅41巴仙的新加坡人,对于目前的生活并不感到快乐,只有五成的人认为他们岁目前生活感到满足,即每两位中,就有一位对他们短期或长期目标的进度感到不满意。 这也意味着,一切阻碍目标实现的困难都与金钱相关,例如生活成本增加、无法储蓄。许多人认为,阻碍他们完成目标的最主要原因在于生活成本的增长,让他们无法实行储蓄习惯,而阻碍了目标的前进。 经常都会听财务专家的建议,指一个家庭内至少要有能够维持至少三个月的紧急基金,应对突如其来的意外或失业。然而,近乎半数的新加坡人却没有能够维持六个月以上的紧急基金,甚至高达两成的人都没有自觉紧急基金的重要性。 退休后生活仍被钱困扰,不尽如意…