At an international Ministerial Conference on Diabetes in Nov last year, the Coordinating Minister for Social Policies Tharman Shanmugaratnam said that war on diabetes has to be waged on multiple fronts (‘Diabetes must be fought on multiple fronts: Tharman‘, 27 Nov 2018).

He said that employers, citizens and the whole of government need to chip in to fight a condition that not only compromised an individual’s quality of life, but was also a huge drain on national resources.

“It has been estimated that the global annual healthcare expenditure on diabetes was over US$700 billion (S$961 billion) in 2017,” said Tharman. Today, almost half a million of Singaporeans are already living with the disease.

The only way to keep the disease at bay is to change mindsets across the board, with a sustained effort at putting out information on the health risks of diabetes, said Tharman.

“The pleasures of a slice of chocolate cake are immediate, while the costs to health are hidden and set in much later, but with potentially severe consequences,” he said. Parents could also play a critical part in teaching children to eat healthy, he added.

At the conference, World Health Organisation director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus also said that the essential first step in fighting diabetes is “prevention, prevention, prevention”.

Tharman said that the effort to fight diabetes could not be confined to health ministries. “The levers or influences that governments have go well beyond the healthcare sector,” he said.

That is why, in Singapore, the food and beverage sector had been persuaded to switch to healthier ingredients, with almost half the hawker stalls offering at least one healthier option last year. More water dispensers were also being installed at hawker centres to encourage people to drink plain water instead of sugary drinks.

It has also been reported that Singapore is currently examining the idea of implementing a sugar tax in Singapore.

Minister says one thing, MP does another

While the ruling PAP government is telling Singaporeans through Minister Tharman that diabetes must be fought on multiple fronts with mindset changes across the board, PAP MP Melvin Yong was dishing out free chocolate bars to many elderly residents at the Pek Kio market yesterday (16 Jun) in “celebration” of Father’s Day.

Yong’s “generosity” came to light when residents mistakenly saw the expiry date on some of the chocolate bars. Photos of the said bars quickly spread online.

Yong then took to the social media in the evening accusing people of spreading falsehoods in social media. He noted that the claim was untrue as the date shown on the packaging clearly shows that the chocolate bars only expire in 2020 instead of the alleged 2011 date.

“It has come to my attention that someone has deliberately circulated a falsehood following our Father’s Day walkabout this morning,” Yong said. “The social media post and Whatsapp message falsely allege that the chocolate given out by our PAP activists at Pek Kio Market had expired in January 2011.”

“The photo that accompanied the false claim clearly shows that the expiry date on the chocolate wrapper is 9 January 2020. The wrapper also indicates that the format for the BEST BEFORE date is ‘DD/MM/YY’ (e.g. 09/01/20),” he added.

However, what is interesting is that on the chocolate bar wrappers, a PAP logo with his name was pasted on it, sending the message that the free chocolate bars actually come from Singapore’s ruling party, the PAP.

It then begs the question if eating chocolates is the new way of fighting diabetes by the PAP government.

Perhaps MP Yong was thinking that the “pleasures” of a chocolate bar are immediate but with no costs to health nor consequences?

Note that many residents living in Pek Kio are elderly.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Hatchet job on Tan Jee Say

By Tan Jee Say – I wish to thank all my friends…

总统会见王瑞杰 评估国家长期投资预估回报

昨日(12月8日),新加坡总统哈莉玛在脸书分享一张照片,她与总统顾问理事会成员,正在会议上聆听副总理暨财政部长王瑞杰,向她汇报本届政府对于相关资产投资的长期实得回报推算。 哈莉玛解释在准备年度财政预算案上,这个环节十分重要,他们将审视有关回报预估,在国家储备净投资回报收益(NIR)框架下,预估回报用来决定政府可以动用多少储备。 与会者还包括金融管理局(MAS)、政府投资公司(GIC)和淡马锡控股的代表。 哈莉玛指出,他与财政部以及投资机构在宏观经济议题上有良好的讨论,并表示将在总统顾问理事会咨询下,检视政府的提案。 根据宪法,每一年预算案,政府对预期回报的预估,都要经过总统批准。 在每个财年开始前,GIC、金管局和淡马锡控股,将由内部投资专才,提出预期长期实得回报的预估,此外也会征询外部专才意见。 之后,财政部将检视有关预估回报率,并建议用在三个机构投资净资产。如果综合和政府对预期回报率存有异议,则将根据过去20年平均回报率,作为政府可支出金额的基准。 在财政部的官网,也有解释道,以20年平均历史回报率,作为避免总统与政府间分歧的中立和务实基础,避免现今政府瘫痪。 要知道,每届政府累积的盈余,都要纳入国家储备金,创造国家储备净投资回报贡献(Net Investment Returns Contributions,简称NIRC)。…

精英制度忽略贫富差距复杂因素 严燕松冀扶持同胞携手共进

尽管并没有出现在国家信约、国歌中,但似乎精英治国(Meritocracy)被吹捧为治国的“金科玉律”。工人党阿裕尼集选区议员严燕松提醒,精英政治固然对于打击贪腐、裙带关系是很好的准则,但似乎对每个公民都以能力和成就角度看待,而分出次优等级。 他打个比方,对于小孩我们是否也要以精英制度来苛求他们?如果考了不好的成绩,就只能吃快熟面、睡小房间?但对于我们的社会却是:你赚的不多,你就活该拥有糟糕的生活条件。 对此严燕松提及贫富差距中的复杂因素,则就好比一些人起跑条件优越,提前20米、跑道畅通无阻、还有良师指导,但遗憾的是,有些人的起跑线却可能从后方10米开始。 他指出,工人党对新加坡的愿景是国人都能达成他们的梦想,透过有竞争力的本地公司、活力经济,国人能合力打造这个家园。同时,一个有问责制的健全机制,比任何政党都更能持久。 要实现这愿景,就必须确保家庭能抵御生活中的风暴、校园能让学生为生存做好准备;社会安全网也能确保那些不慎跌倒的人,能够再次站起。 然而精英制度不看这些复杂因素,仅强调个人成就。“但我们是一个国家,不是一家企业。我们是同胞们的守护者。我们需要扶助彼此走完赛道。” 严燕松是在新加坡透视论坛,为“展望2030年新加坡政治”的对话会上,这么指出。 受邀嘉宾也包括卫生部兼通讯及新闻部高级政务部长普杰立医生,以及前进党非选区议员潘群勤。 严燕松也强调,目前面对的问题尤为复杂,需要各界的集思广益,而不是比赛谁能更快提出好主意,异议人士也不该被指责,“所有利益相关者应该合作而不是竞争,以找到应对挑战的最佳解决方案。” 普杰立:两党制由国人决定 回溯2011年,新加坡总理李显龙,曾表示两党制在新加坡根本行不通。治国最关键的是人才,唯有让A队有最大的成功机会,才能保障国家的前途,不能为了反对党所说的“买保险”,而去削弱A队。 对此,有与会者在会上抛出质问,从去年选举可见,人民希望看到更多反对党声音,行动党是否支持这种观点。…

导致46人受伤包括一死者 去年PMD相关火患数量倍增

新加坡民防部队12日发布年度统计数据,与个人代步工具(PMD)相关的火患在去年几乎增加了一倍。 当局指出,与PMD相关的火患自2015年开始的首宗后,每年都持续增加,但是2019年却由 2018年的52宗“急速上升”至102宗。 相反的,与电动脚车(PAB)相关的火患则从2018年的22宗,下降至去年的13宗。 政府为了解决和减少与PMD相关的火患,已经于去年成立由属各单位,包括民防部、陆路交通管理局和建屋发展局等机构组成工作队。民防部队指出,去年涉及火患的PMD,都未持有UL2272认证,而且部分PMD还经过改装,尤其是在电池部分。 去年涉及PMD和PAB火患造成了46人受伤,比2018年的26名伤者增加了77巴仙。46人中,还包括一名40岁的男子,自发生于武吉巴督的相关火患中获救后送院,却不治身亡。 民防部队指出,去年将近七成此类火患发生在住家,因此敦促民众,尤其是PMD持有者在处理工具时要保持警惕,否则可能导致人命伤亡和财务损失的火患。 基于此类火患的增加已经引起关注,当局将持续强调相关的消防安全风险,并通过社会和主流媒体教育民众有关的防范措施。“所有未持有UL2272认证的PMD也必须被送到指定地点进行销毁。” 当局补充,此类的火患有了明显下跌的趋势,而11月实施的PMD在行人道上行驶禁令起了显著影响。 民防部队指出,在2019年当局接获2862通火患通报电话,比前年增加了8巴仙。 植被火患增加五成 报告指出,37巴仙的火患是由随意点燃的材料,如未熄灭的烟头、木炭所引起,成为火患的主要肇因,而电线短路成为第二主要肇因。…