Blurred defocused abstract background of people walking on the street in Orchard Road in Singapore – Crowded city center during rush hour in urban business area zebra crossing – View from building top (Photo by View Apart from Shutterstock.com)

In 2018, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) commissioned a survey and it was revealed that 15.4 per cent of non-Malaysian work permit holders did not receive their in-principle approval (IPA) letter before they enter Singapore. This is a 4 per cent increase compared to the results gathered in 2014, the last time a similar survey was done.

According to the law, employers are supposed to send over the IPA letter to their employees after their permit application is approved and before leaving their home country. It is important as the letter includes vital information like the term and conditions of their employment, including the basic salary.

In fact, it is seen as a de-facto contract, in case other written agreements were not given. As for employers who don’t obey to this rule, they may be fined up to S$10,000.

As reported by The New Paper (TNP), Migrant Workers’ Centre (MWC) chairman Yeo Guat Kwang said that there’s a hike in defiant employers because a number of them are not aware of the rule.

“We need to continue to urge employers to provide the IPA to their workers,” he said while speaking on the sidelines of an NTUC May Day event to celebrate migrant workers.

As such, he pushes foreign workers to report early when they face issues with their IPA letters, especially problems with their salary.

Adding to that, Transient Workers Count Too general manager Ethan Guo told TNP that during a salary disagreement, employers generally have more advantages as work permits are “directly tied” to them.

“Workers who make a complaint to MOM will face premature termination of their jobs, which will leave them vulnerable and potentially be sent home before managing to recover the debts they incurred in taking loans to work here,” he said.

He added, “These days, workers with salary disputes are almost automatically allowed a change of employer. However, the success rate of finding new employment in Singapore is very low”.

Although more foreign workers fail to receive their IPA letter, the survey pointed out that these workers are generally happy with the working conditions in the country and would suggest Singapore to their friends and family to work.

The MOM survey was conducted by market research company Blackbox Research on approximately 2,500 work permit holders and 500 S Pass holders who were randomly polled.

As for their overall assessment, 86.3 per cent of work pass holders and 87.5 per cent of S Pass holders noted that they were satisfied working in the city-state, a similar results to the survey conducted in 2014.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

《雅虎新闻》编辑:资源厚此薄彼与自我审查 成新加坡新闻界常态

评论来自《雅虎新闻》助理新闻编辑Nicholas Yong: 华人有许多名句格言,劝勉大家多听老人言,礼上敬老。所以我想虚心接纳资深老报人巴吉尔(PN Balji)的建议。 巴吉尔是英语媒体《新報》(The New Paper)与《今日报》前主编。他在本月14日,才刚推介他的新书《不情愿的主编》(Reluctant Editor译名)。 在新书推介上,这位70岁老报人指出,很少有新加坡媒体人撰写写新闻线上的故事,当中有许多人选择把这些经历带进棺材里。 《不情愿的主编》忆述巴吉尔在担任《新报》和《今日报》期间的经历,当中也有许多政府与主流媒体的具争议关系的内幕。使之成为纪伊国屋(Books Kinokuniya)书局非小说类的畅销书籍。 在巴吉尔笔下,描绘一个脸皮薄的政府,对于负面报导往往过度反应,且不惧采取强硬手段。媒体人工作如走钢丝,许多记者也敢怒不敢言。…

为“专注打理市镇会” AHTC市镇会同意遵循国家发展部指示

阿裕尼—后港市镇理事会今日(17日)发文告表示,为了“能把精力投入打理市镇的核心事务”,决定遵循国家发展部指令,限制工人党主席林瑞莲与议员刘程强,在市镇会财务上的决策权。 去年11月30日,该市镇会议决上述二人无需回避市镇会所有财务事务;不过国家发展部随后在12月3日,对该市镇会发出指令,要求限制上述二人财务决策权。 该部认为市镇会提出的陈情理由,和法庭裁决两人疏失“不能相提并论”;也指市镇会的改进措施不显著,恐未能有效避免财务疏失重演。 对此,该市镇会也在今日文告指出,国家发展部长黄循财,动用《市镇会法》43D(2)项,要该市镇会遵从指示,对于政府决定“U转”“感到惊讶”。 去年11月5日,财政部长王瑞杰发起在国会发起动议。当时财政部及教育部第二部长英兰妮曾指出,市镇会才有权限裁决是否要刘、林二人回避财政事务。 再者,当时官委议员王丽婷质问,为何要在国会通过没有法律效应的动议,即便市镇会法43D项已赋予部长权利可采取必要行动。 但社会及家庭发展部长兼国家发展部第二部长李智陞随即解释,林瑞莲、刘程强二人2011年着手市镇会,之后数年才加入43D项,也指该条款让部长依据报告或调查、检讨后,才采取行动。 阿裕尼-后港市镇会称,同意部长指上述条款缺追溯权力。不过,有鉴于国家发展部警告若不遵循指示,可能面对惩处,该市镇会只得遵守,以便把精力都集中在管理市镇会事务。 此外,该市镇会也解释,自今年1月16日起,林瑞莲将不再代表市镇会批准支出或单方面授权接受/豁免任何招标及报价等。 同时,林瑞莲和刘程强在市镇会采购和开销委员会投票将无效;并在下月的会议,移除两人支票签署人的权限。

33-yr-old man investigated for lodging false reports of robbery

A 33-year old man has been arrested by the police for lodging…

总理提告梁实轩诽谤诉讼 今早公堂开审

总理李显龙提告时评人梁实轩的诽谤诉讼,于今早(6日)10时开始在高庭公堂审理,审讯将持续至本周五(9日)。 承审法官是高庭法官艾迪阿都拉(Aedit Abdullah)。时评人梁实轩的代表律师是林鼎律师,总理则由高级律师文达星等人代表。 今日的审讯也吸引不少民众有意出席,从早上5时许,就有民众排队;但基于疫情关系,高庭限制旁听人数。直至早上7时许,所有20个旁听席位都已座满。 总理李显龙今早9时30分抵达法庭,他也将在庭上接受证人的质询。上述诉讼原定在今年7月6日聆审,然而由于总理代表律师之一文达星身体不适而展延。 只因分享一则脸书贴文,梁实轩在2018年11月被总理提告诽谤。 梁实轩是在2018年11月初,分享了誌期11月5日的State Times Review(STR)文章,标题为《李显龙成为一马公司弊案主要调查对象》。 有关文章指《砂拉越报告》主编克莱尔,在接受访谈时指出在一马公司弊案中,新加坡和瑞士及美国,成了调查对象。但较后《砂》已澄清有关文章内容不实,要求STR纠正。 据了解,资讯与媒体发展局(IMDA)隔日致函梁实轩,指其文章违反网络行为准则,要求后者在六小时内撤下有关文章。梁实轩也遵守IMDA的要求。 11月12日,德尊(新加坡)法律事务所致函梁实轩,要求他对总理李显龙公开道歉,并赔偿后者名誉损失。…