A netizen by the name Fattah Kent took to his Facebook on Monday (27 May) to express his anger and disappointment towards Singapore Post (SingPost) for losing his parcel from Australia at their processing facility.

According to Mr Kent, it appears that he made a purchase for an item from Australia for AUD$1551.57 (S$1479.43) on 10 April. The Australian seller then shipped the item out on 30 April and it “arrived in Singapore and at Singapore Post on 2nd of May 2019 @ 6.38am.

However, things took a drastic turn after this because at 12.04pm on the same day, Mr Kent checked SingPost Tracking and found out that the status stated “Unsuccessful Delivery. Identification document not ready”.

After finding it rather strange, the man then contacted SingPost via its live chat and was told “it was a mishap on their end and no attempted delivery was made”.

“I was told to wait 3 days to get an update from them. 3 days passed, and I received no news. I had to call them again and was told to wait another 2 days. 4 days passed, and I received no news AGAIN. I called them to receive my own update and they requested me to call the seller to ask for compensation,” he wrote.

He revealed that a SingPost staff named Shachi Gaur told him that his item went missing at the processing facility, and when Mr Kent demanded for a full compensation of the parcel’s cost, he was told it was not possible “as their standard procedure was to compensate the seller”.

“Mind you, the seller has received the money and it makes absolutely no sense for Singapore Post to give him more money and leave me empty-handed. After an exchange of heated argument, I was told to wait until the end of the day to receive a call from the Manager who will be able to answer all my doubts and questions. No call was attempted,” he expressed.

Finally, a day later, the supervisor of the social media team got in touch with Mr Kent, but noted the same thing that there’s nothing much can be done as his parcel was declared lost. At this point, the netizen was extremely annoyed and had another argument with the supervisor, before being told that a manager will get back to him.

The next day, another supervisor, Suvam Chatterjee, rang him and repeated the same excuse, and said that an investigation is ongoing and he will receive an update soon.

After some wait, SingPost told him that they will make a one-time exception and reimburse him (the recipient). After submitting all the necessary documents requested by the company for the compensation, SingPost called him and told that the maximum that they will pay is S$150, although he kept asking for a full reimbursement.

“What utter rubbish. I ordered my parcel > the seller fulfilled the order on his end > Australian Post delivered the parcel from Australia to Singapore with no issue > Singapore Post lost my parcel. And yet, Singapore Post is doing the bare minimum and only compensating me less than 10% of the original price when it is clearly Singapore Post fault. This is daylight robbery and I am utterly disappointed,” he said.

He added that he is now trying to get full reimbursement and noted that how “horrible” and “incompetent” the company is.

Upon reading his post, many other netizens shared their disappointment towards the company and penned down their dissatisfaction over SingPost’s act towards Mr Kent. Despite all the previous bad cases involving SingPost like late mail and parcel delivery as well as discarding unopened letters in the bin without delivering them, some highlighted that the courier company has not improved at all, even after apologising for their shortcomings and announced measures to improve their poor service.

A group of online users also pointed out a similar situation that they’ve encountered with the company. Some even said it happened to them on multiple occasions and they’ve lost a huge sum of money because of SingPost’s poor service.

 

On the other hand, Latok Bomoh Rock and Zen Teng, who are current and former employees of SingPost respectively, noted that no one in the management care about such problems. Zen Teng added that it’s their Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) and they are not bothered if an item goes missing and will only pay a maximum reimbursement of S$150.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

讥公积金局含糊其辞 网民:何不65岁自动入息?

近期,有网民转载分享,一名即将迎来65岁生日的公积金会员,收到了公积金局的来信。信函通知他,如有意在65岁就开始提取存款,就必须另行通知当局,否则,就要等到70岁才能开始提款。 信函中表示,若该会员选择推迟领取,就能享有更长的领取期,或每月更高的入息。 信中也用黑体强调: “如果你想要在70岁才开始领取入息,你什么都不用做。” 对此,许多网民质疑当局把公积金退休存款计划领取入息的年龄,悄悄推迟到70岁。 公积金局在本月19日于脸书发文澄清,表示会员仍是在65岁可开始领取入息,政策未变。 不过公积金局也强调,国人仍须提出领取入息的申请。如果没有提出申请,当局只会在会员满70岁时,才开始自动每月发放入息。 公积金局指出,1954年出生的会员,领取入息年龄仍是65岁,这个政策在2007年公布,至今没有改变。 会员到了符合年龄后,会收到公积金局信函,通知他们需填写申请表格,或网上申请以启动领取入息。 网民吁65岁自动入息简化程序 对于公积金局的解释,一些网民认为公积金局只不过重复了群众已知的事实,人民要知道,为何自动入息非得要推迟到70岁,而不是65岁? 网民Serene…

原水河流含氨量超标 柔佛河滤水站暂停运作

马来西亚新山的沙翁河(Sungai Sayong)于周四被测出氨含量超标,导致古来(Kulai)一袋1万7000户家庭被迫断水,也影响新加坡公用事业局在柔佛州所设的柔佛河滤水站正常运作。 公用事业局于周四晚上发文告指出,已经停止了柔佛滤水站的运作,导致供给新加坡和部分柔佛地区的水供中断。不过我国水供不会受影响,因为当局已经加强了海水淡化厂和滤水站的生产,以满足当地需求。 当局表示会密切关注柔佛河的原水质量,并且“在水质适于使用时,重新恢复原水抽取和处理工作”。 根据1962年水供协议,新加坡每天可以从柔佛河抽取2.5亿加仑的水,并且有义务为柔佛州提供高达2巴仙的进口水。而新加坡所提供给柔佛的自来水,比协议中的多。 油棕厂水管破裂所致 柔佛州国际贸易、投资及公用事业委员主席潘伟斯指出,位于古来士年纳(Sedenak)一家油棕厂的生物综合中心水管破裂,导致含氨污水流入柔佛河的支流之一的沙翁河,而这条支流也是提供原水的河流之一。 也是武吉峇都议员的潘伟斯表示,有关事故发生在星期三早上7时。 他于周四发文告表示,根据马来西亚报告指出,大约下午6时30分,沙翁第一滤水站和第二滤水站不得不关闭,因为水质含氨量过高而无法处理原水。 接着在星期四早上5时30分和11时30分,士芒加滤水站和柔佛河滤水站也被迫停止运作。柔佛泰丰滤水站也停止处理自来水。 他表示,当局会采取必要的行动对付油棕厂,包括取消该厂取水许可证,并在事后给予罚单。 “柔佛政府不会就此事妥协,柔佛水务监管机构(Bakaj)已经立刻取消了该油棕厂的取水许可证。”…

Cycling path network expansion to be brought forward 'a couple of year', says Minister Lam Pin Min

An expansion of Singapore’s cycling path network could be brought forward to…

Teo Soh Lung visibly shaken from police raid involving 7-8 officers without search warrant

Teo Soh Lung, a lawyer and former Internal Security Act (ISA) detainee…