It was reported in the media yesterday (23 May) that a local aesthetics and beauty supplement company Esthemedica confirmed that it did hire Australian pedophile Boris Kunsevitsky as a regional business development director. This is a position based in Singapore.

Kunsevitsky was arrested in Australia and pleaded guilty in a Melbourne court this week to sexually abusing dozens of children over a period of 16 years. He even produced child pornography material where he induced a child to have sex with another child.

He was charged with child sexual abuse, including having sex with a child, making child pornography material, inducing a child to have sex with another child, persistent sexual abuse of a child, and importing child pornography material.

The court documents showed the offences involved 44 child victims, including five in Singapore. The court heard that he traveled across Southeast Asia on supposed work trips, but these were used instead for “sex tourism”.

Esthemedica’s marketing manager Hoong Cheong Hon told the media that he did not know of Kunsevitsky’s “appalling” acts until news of his Australian court case emerged this week. Hoong confirmed that Kunsevitsky joined the company in 2014 but left for Australia in July 2017 in a “quite abrupt” fashion. But the company continued to employ him.

Even as recent as last Friday (17 May), Hoong shared that they were “talking normally” over some business matters over the phone. Hoong confirmed that the Australian did go overseas for road shows and had “traveled quite a bit” within the Asian region during this time.

According to Kunsevitsky’s LinkedIn information, he is the International Business and Clinical Development Director at Esthemedica Pte Ltd:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Earnings drop for 2nd consecutive quarter

by Leong Sze Hian I refer to the Ministry of Manpower’s (MOM)…

Malaysian govt ready for Malaysia-Singapore cross-border travel starting 17 Aug

The Malaysian government has announced that it is ready for the cross-border…

《慈母舰》采访普杰立视频出现政党标志、宣传政策 本地导演质问资媒局:是否抵触《电影法》?

本地电影导演施忠明在脸书发文分享,他今早电邮致函资讯通信媒体发展局(IMDA),向后者询问本地英语网络媒体“慈母舰”制作的一段视频,因其内容呈现政党标志、有政治人物宣传政治课题,是否抵触了《电影法》禁止制作政党政治影片的条文? 新加坡英语网络媒体“慈母舰”(Mothership sg)日前录制视频,采访交通部高级政务部长普杰立医生,内容谈及陆路交通规划和2040年陆路交通发展总蓝图。 由于普杰立的父亲多米尼克(Dominic Puthucheary),曾是社阵政治人物,视频中的快问快答访谈,不免询问普杰立,行动党和社阵,会如何选择。后者则回答选行动党,不过他说很久以前两者过去曾在一起(指社阵领袖原一同创立行动党,惟后来因政见不同离开)。 针对这段视频,施忠明质疑,既然这是“慈母舰”拍摄、并非政府创作的视频,就不能在《电影法》下的第40条文被豁免(只有政府指示或发行的影片可豁免)。 而根据新加坡《电影法》第33条文,私自制作政党政治影片是被违法的。在该条文下,任何人进口、制作、发行或放映政党政治影片即属犯罪,可面对不超过10万元的罚款或监禁不超过两年。 施忠明认为,上述视频里又出现偏驳政治立场、政治人物推介政治课题、出现政党标志等等。 ”敢问有关视频是否已送交(资媒局)进行分级?在电影法第33条文下,会否被归类为政党政治影片?“他在电邮中如是质问资媒局。 2015年民主党拍《白衣牌洗衣粉》视频 此外,施忠明也在贴文中附上2015年的一个案例,那时资媒局指民主党制作的一段诙谐讽刺短片,根据《电影法》定义乃是政党政治影片。 对此民主党领导徐顺全批评资媒局选择性地诠释该法,因为政府也有以漫画的形式,借中国寓言和歌舞等来生动描绘建国一代配套和终身健保等重要政策。…

Rejection of the Old – A Crying Shame

~ By: Dr Wong Wee Nam ~ Two recent incidents that made…