Former Channel NewsAsia (CNA) reporter Haseenah Koyakutty shared a blog post written by Reform Party chief, Kenneth Jeyaretnam in which he again questions the secrecy behind the salary of Temasek Holdings CEO and wife of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, Ho Ching.

Ms Koyakutty said she’s ‘glad’ that Mr Jeyaretnam is remaining persistent on the issue which she herself has attempted to dig into several times before.

She explained that she had once asked the Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in a media face time in about this very topic in 2004 just before he assumed the Premiership and that he apparently ‘did not like it’. A civil servant had apparently told the reporter that the PM went ‘ballistic’ afterwards. Ms Koyakutty also noted that the PM hadn’t answered the question properly.

She said, “I appreciated the civil servant’s initiative to let me know as a friend but had PM addressed by question properly back then without temper tantrum, maybe he wouldn’t be in hot soup today?”

She then drew a comparison to Myanmar’s own Aung San Suu Kyi’s ‘entitled’ behaviour which has revealed itself in the past few years.

TOC has reached out to the Prime Minister’s Office for comment on these statements made by Ms Koyakutty.

No answers, only deflections

In his article, Mr Jeyaretnam highlights Worker’s Party MP Png Eng Huat asking the Ministry of Finance (MOF) in Parliament for details about the remuneration of the top brass at Temasek Holdings and GIC – a holding company and sovereign wealth fund, both owned by the Singapore government.

In Parliament, Second Finance Minister Lawrence Wong responded to MP Png’s question by saying that the government has an ‘arms-length’ relationship with Temasek and GIC and that the government refrains from interfering with their Boards’ decisions, such as the appointment of Ho Ching as CEO of Temasek. He later adds that salaries at Temasek and GIC are decided respectively by independent boards.

“Broadly speaking, both entities adopt remuneration frameworks that are based on performance and industry benchmarks”, he explained.

Mr Jeyaretnam said, “If I am wrong about the likely billions of dollars Ho Ching has been paid, then why has the Government refused to tell us her earnings? Why is it a state secret?”

Temasek, as TOC has reported before, is an exempt private company under the Singapore Companies Act, meaning it is not required to publish its audited statutory consolidated financial statements. Without those, we have no way of know just how much Ho Ching makes as CEO.

When Mr Png pointed out in a follow up question that the government should know the remuneration structures of the companies of which they are the major shareholders, Mr Wong proceed to merely explain ‘the system’ they are attempting to design with Temasek and GIC – sidestepping any discussion of remuneration.

This response is entirely contradictory to what the Minister of Law and Home Affairs K Shanmugam had said in parliament before that “you can ask for whatever information that you want and we will either have to give you the information or we will have to explain to you why we cannot give it”.

Mr Wong’s answer to WP’s question clearly is neither informative nor does it explain why the actual answer cannot be given. It’s merely deflective. We still don’t know what Ho Ching’s salary is or why that information cannot be made public.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Motorcyclist dies in accident involving two cars and trailer along SLE

A 45-year-old motorcyclist was killed in an accident involving two cars and…

SPF alerts members of the public to be aware of fake email from Traffic Police

Singapore Police Force (SPF) alerts member of the public to be aware to…

蓝彬明:医生无需向病患解释所有疗程可能副作用

卫生部高级政务部长蓝彬明医生指出,医生无需向向病人列出药物或疗程可能带来的所有副作用或并发症。 议员们向卫生部提问,近期一名骨外科专科医生为病人打针前,告知对方可能出现的并发症,而被新加坡医药理事会纪律仲裁庭重罚十万元。议员们担心,此举将让医生花更多时间向病人阐释疗程中所有可能引起的并发症,导致医生采取“自保式医疗”,也可能间接推高医药费。此时也引起民间和医疗界联署要求政府阐明立场。 对此,在答复议员询问时,蓝彬明医生解释,有关被罚款医生是因为完全没有告知病人疗程的副作用,才被罚款。故此,不应诠释为在此个案后,将来医生在疗程时都要罗列所有副作用。 他补充,根据医疗指南,医生有责任告知病患,让病患掌握有关疗程和健康的具体情况。 蓝彬明也指出,一些中立的医生也许会认为上述罚款太严厉。医学界一直都很关注最高罚款额的议题,甚至考虑以停牌制裁。 他表示考量到有关个案的情景,可以理解医学界的关注点。他表示,《医疗注册法》在2010年修法,此后对医疗人员不当行为的罚款从一万元提升早10万元。 不过,卫生部和律政部今年初协助医理会成立了裁决委员会,以协助维持刑法的一致和公平性质,提高纪律审裁过程的透明和严谨。 蓝彬明说“卫生部不希望看到医者走上自保式医疗”,但也应理解若涉及不当行为,仍需接受纪律处分。针对已受惩戒的医生林联安(译音),蓝彬明说由于医理会和林联安都已接受裁决没上诉,因此无需翻案重审。