Bloomberg reported on Tue (14 May) that Bayer AG was ordered to pay more than US$2 billion in damages to a Californian couple that claimed they got cancer as a result of using its Roundup weedkiller for about three decades.

The jury agreed that Alva and Alberta Pilliod’s exposure to Roundup used for residential landscaping was a “substantial factor” in their non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. In addition to US$1 billion for each spouse, the jury awarded damages of about US$55 million for the couple’s medical bills and pain and suffering. After the verdict, the couple’s lawyer said the evidence showed that “from day one, Monsanto (Bayer’s subsidiary) has never had any interest in finding out whether Roundup is safe.”

This is the 3rd trial Bayer has lost over the Roundup debacle. It’s also the largest jury award in the U.S. so far this year.

Bayer lost the first trial in Aug last year when a California state court ruled that Roundup caused the terminal cancer of Dewayne Johnson, a former school groundskeeper. In Mr Johnson’s case, the jury found Monsanto had “acted with malice or oppression” and awarded him US$289 million in damages. The damages were later reduced to US$78 million.

It lost the 2nd trial in March at a federal court, which ruled that Roundup was responsible for a Mr Hardeman’s cancer. During the trial, the 70-year-old testified that he had use the weed killer for a long period of time and at one time got it on his skin before he was diagnosed with cancer. The jury decided to award US$80 million to the victim and was perturbed that the company did not warn the plaintiff of the herbicide’s alleged cancer risks.

Roundup was produced by Bayer’s subsidiary Monsanto. In fact, it was Singapore’s Temasek Holdings which helped Bayer acquire Monsanto. It was reported in Apr last year that Bayer sold 3.6 per cent stake to Temasek for 3 billion euros at 96.77 euros per share. The money was used as part of Bayer’s plan to takeover Monsanto.

Together with its existing holding in Bayer, Temasek would then own about 4 percent in Bayer after the transaction. By Jun last year, with Temasek’s help, Bayer successfully acquired Monsanto to become the biggest seed and agricultural chemical maker in the world.

Bayer’s share price sinking

Not surprisingly, Bayer share price dropped. It has been steadily sinking since the first adverse verdict in the Roundup lawsuit was announced last August. As of yesterday (15 May), Bayer’s share price closed at 56.45 euros. Since Temasek bought 3 billion euros worth of shares at 96.77 euros in Apr last year, that means it has lost 40.32 euros per share or 41.7% of the 3 billion euros investment.

Analysts at Bloomberg Intelligence raised their estimate for a potential settlement value to as much as $10 billion, up from a peak of $6 billion.

“The company has got to come to the table with a viable plan to resolve these cases, or the losses are going to mount,” Micah Dortch, managing partner at the Potts Law Firm in Dallas who has filed dozens of Roundup cases, said. “This outcome should make Monsanto realize the seriousness of these claims and how a jury perceives the evidence.”

During the 3rd trial, when the company’s lawyer asked a juror after the verdict what the panel wanted to hear from Bayer, the juror responded that he wanted proof the chemical was safe: “I wanted you to get up and drink it.”

There are now more than 13,400 people want to sue Bayer and its subsidiary Monsanto.

“The verdict in this trial has no impact on future cases and trials, as each one has its own factual and legal circumstances,” Bayer said. It continues to defend the safety of Roundup’s active ingredient glyphosate since inheriting the product from Monsanto.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

陈振声吁抓住海外机遇 余振忠提醒数因素下少有中小企业脱颖而出

在昨日的公开演说,贸工部长陈振声鼓励国人更积极进取,抓紧新加坡以外的机遇,不要只满足于我国目前所取得的成绩。 他声称政府会加大力度,引导商团协助有意进驻其他市场的本地公司,并培育一批能在区域与全球市场站稳阵脚的新一代企业。 然而,工人党前非选区议员余振忠提醒,真正的挑战在于,面对成本高、市场小,乃至于需要和官联企业或其他政府支持大型单位竞争,这些因素导致并不是很多中小企业能脱颖而出。尽管当局鼓吹企业精神,但现实就是在新加坡发展并不容易。 不鼓励分歧意见 他分析,有别于其他经济体,在新加坡的成本、社会保障薄弱,再者若失败耻辱感更强,且不太鼓励分歧意见。 “我们鼓励创造力,但是在学校,却偏好标准答案。想搞点新意思,你就要把它关掉。” 余振忠过去曾倡议更多开放空间和“沙盒创新”,允许本地初创公司为政府试用创新解决方案。然而,当前的采购心态是尽可能聘用现成的大型竞标者,这样,若项目失败,评估团队不必接受责罚,我们已惯于规避风险。 多年来政府论调也常提如何更好地组织海外业务、领导本地公司向海外扩张等。但现实情况是,我们仍然不像韩国或日本商团那样,能成群结队出征寻找机遇。 “残酷的现实世界” 余振忠也点出,其他如新加坡一样小的西方国家,尚且有国际品牌,但我们除了少数几个官联集团外,还没有真正全球化的品牌。 更何况,瞬息万变的竞争格局中,一些官联公司实则也面对严重挫败。“是的,那里是一个残酷的现实世界。”

Dr. Ting to facebook commenter: Pathetic to compare SWIFT with field hospital

Dr. Ting Choon Meng, local inventor and entrepreneur who was embroiled in…

一马公司弊案:刘特佐被曝获塞浦路斯护照 该国总统宣布取消之!

涉嫌一马公司弊案的关键人物刘特佐至今仍未被逮捕,在丑闻爆发后神隐,如今却被揭发申请地中海塞浦路斯(Cyprus)的护照。 据塞浦路斯当地报导,刘特佐4年前入境塞浦路斯,试图以一项投资计划获得该国的护照,但其条件是必须在塞浦路斯银行存入500万欧元长达三年,以及购买至少50万欧元的房子。 据称,刘特佐于2015年9月23日,通过全球护照和公民身分公司Henley & Partners以500万欧元(2326万令吉)购买在塞浦路斯东部濒临地中海的阿依纳帕(Ayia Napa)一座还未竣工的别墅。 该公司此前还帮刘特佐获得圣基茨和尼维斯国家的护照,但由于丑闻爆发后,国际刑警组织已取消刘特佐的该国护照。 针对刘特佐手握塞浦路斯护照的消息,塞浦路斯总统阿纳斯塔夏季斯宣布取消刘特佐所持该国的护照。 《美联社》指出,阿纳斯塔夏季斯表示,护照在审批过程中出现失误,由此宣布取消护照。 他说,“目前多大10至15宗类似的案例,均为投资者未在审核中,因此被判定不合格。因此有意撤回这些”错误“的护照。 他也说,“任何人在非法途径下获得公民资格,将会被撤销,而且必须尽快取回,越快越好。“ 据《美联社》指出,塞浦路斯发言人表示,自2013年塞普洛斯面临金融危机后,启动了该投资计划,吸引不少投资者前来,目前已向约4000名投资者获得护照。…