Just a day before the Singapore parliament passed the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POMFA), Amnesty International (AI) called for the Singapore government o ‘drop plans’ to enact a law that ‘would dramatically curtail freedom of expression in the country and beyond.

The statement released on the Amnesty International website on 8 May noted that the bill, which was introduced last month on 1 April to “protect society from damage by online falsehoods created by ‘malicious actors’”, would give the Singapore authorities ‘unchecked powers’ to clamp down on online views which the government disagrees with.

Nicholas Bequelin, AI’s Regional Director for East and Southeast Asia said, “Singapore already has a woeful track record of treating peaceful critics like criminals.” He added that Singaporeans ‘have every reason to fear that this law is designed to gag online expression once and for all’, given the country’s track record of censoring criticism of the government.

Mr Bequelin said of POMFA, “It criminalises free speech and allows the government almost unfettered power to censor dissent. It doesn’t even provide any real definition of what is true or false or, even more worrying, ‘misleading.’”

The law which passed with support from 74 members of parliament – nine Worker’s Party MPs and Non-Constituency MPs rejected it while three Nomination MP abstained from voting – provides for severe criminal penalties including up to 10 years of imprisonment for anyone found guilty of breaking the law. The act also requires tech companies like Facebook and Twitter to remove content to display corrections as per the government’s instructions.

Mr Bequelin said, “This law would give Singapore overwhelming leverage over the likes of Facebook and Twitter to remove whatever the government determines is ‘misleading’.”

“This is an alarming scenario. While tech firms must take all steps to make digital spaces safe for everyone, this does not provide governments an excuse to interfere with freedom of expression – or rule over the news feed,” he added.

The human rights organisation said “The draft law is part of a long-running campaign by the Singaporean government to clamp down on peaceful government critics through repeated restrictions on the media and criminal indictments against activists, among other measures.”

Highlighting the Select Committee hearings held last year on online falsehoods, AI said that the sessions were “marred by baseless criticism of civil society activists and the forced removal of Han Hui Hui, human rights defender and political activist during a hearing on 29 March 2019”.

The statement went on to describe how Ms Han was forcibly evicted from the public gallery for holding up the cover of a book titled ‘Authoritarian Rule of Law, Legislation, Discourse and Legitimacy in Singapore’.

AI also pointed out the repeated action taken against well-known activist Jolovan Wham who has been a ‘repeated target of repressive laws’, including the latest one in March 2019 when he was charged with ‘illegal assembly’ merely for posing for a photo in front of the State Court Building, holding up a sign demanding that the government drop the criminal defamation case against TOC editor Terry Xu.

Mr Bequelin concludes ominously by saying, “With this alarming bill, the government will be able to further police the online platforms that so many Singaporeans use. It must be withdrawn.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

傅海燕称NETS争议广告无恶意,但“美丽求求你”讽刺视频不妥

今年7月底,闹得沸沸扬扬的电子支付平台NETS广告风波引起热议,除了广告公司和艺人周崇庆致歉,网红“美丽求求你”(Preetipls)也因为拍摄讽刺视频,被警方介入调查,并发出24个月有条件警告。 昨日(10日),文化、社区及青年部长傅海燕在一项活动上重提此事,她表示并不觉得NETS广告有任何冒犯之意,反而是网红“美丽求求你“的讽刺视频使用侮辱性语言, 行为实属不妥。 傅海燕昨日受邀至义顺星烁初级学院参与种族和谐资源中心OnePeople.SG的第五届模拟联合国大会,在对话会上,学生重提争议广告。 对此,傅海燕坦言她个人认为对于周崇庆所饰演的角色并没有感到任何问题,并表示周崇庆当时只是在演好反串的角色,而且他所扮演的人物并具贬损意味,只是在描绘一个“普通人”的角色,如家庭主妇或是工人。 指基层领导反映广告未冒犯印裔 她补充道,针对此事,询问大多数基层领导,包括印度人,均不认为广告具有冒犯之意。 傅海燕表示,NETS广告是想向公众传达一个讯息,即付费平台能够为所有人使用,无论是何种背景、种族的人。 不过,针对网红“美丽求求你“的视频,她则认为“是不同的问题”,因为视频内,网红使用了污秽的语言,指责了广告里的艺人不敏感。 她也解释,网红“美丽求求你”也曾出现取笑华人新年的视频,这样的做法也被视为是不敏感的行为。 “美丽求求你讽刺华人新年” “如果我们放过视频,不采取任何行动,在各族间盛怒之下,万一华人也开始采取类似的侮辱性视频,这对种族间的关系又会产生什么影响?”她解释。…

68-year-old Indonesian national dies from COVID-19, fourth death in Singapore

A 68-year-old Indonesian national who tested positive for COVID-19 has died due…

回国后外出吃肉骨茶 业余摄影师被指未遵守居家通知或面控

日前,33岁业余摄影师因回国后仍外出食用肉骨茶和超市,被指未遵守居家通知,可能会面控。移民与关卡局表示,总检查署或将提控该男子。 该名男子因刚从缅甸回国,在回国后立即接获居家通知,他误以为居家通知隔日才生效,因此外出用食,再去超市准备干粮,还将肉骨茶照片上传至社交网站,引起热议。 事后,他接受访问时表示,因为当时入境后被告知居家通知隔日才生效,才会外出。他也在访问中致歉。 《新明日报》随后询问移民与关卡局,当局表示,目前已与为卫生部一起向总检察署进行相关咨询,而据当局所说,总检查署表示将会提控男子。 而内政部兼律政部长尚穆根也在本周国会上强调,将会对违例者采取行动。 卫生部也在昨日(26日)发表文告,在《传染病法令》下颁布两项法规,任何人在接获居家通知后,14天内不能离开居住地。若出现有急性呼吸道症状的人,若无合理理由,自医生发出证明开始的五天内,均不得离开住所。 一旦被发现违反规定,将可能被判罚款最高一万元,或最高监禁六个月,或两者兼施。