On Wednesday (8 May), Second Finance Minister Lawrence Wong said in Parliament that the Government keeps an “arms-length relationship” with GIC and Temasek Holdings, and does not get involved in their operational decisions, such as remunerations.

Mr Wong, who is also Minister for National Development and sits on the GIC’s board of directors, was responding to Workers’ Party Member of Parliament (MP) Png Eng Huat, who asked if there is a salary cap for key management of companies like sovereign wealth fund GIC and state-owned investors Temasek Holding.

The Minister did not reveal the salaries of the top brass at the two firms, and added that instead the Government expects the Boards to hold accountable for their respective performances.

Mr Png had specifically requested for the range of total annual remuneration – which include salary, annual and performance bonuses – of the top three highest-paid executives at GIC and Temasek Holdings over the last five years.

As such, Mr Wong noted that remuneration falls on performance and industry benchmarks, and supports a “prudent risk-taking culture”. In addition, a part of the remuneration at both companies are also tied to long-term performance.

Further pushing for figures, Mr Png said, “These two entities are managing our reserves, and the Government is the sole shareholder. Usually shareholders would know the remuneration packages for the companies they own.”

Despite the push, Mr Wong still refused to divulge the figure and said that there’s a system that is presented to determine compensation. Based on the past performances of these two entities, it shows that the system works, he added.

The system does not solely look at “one or two expense items” like remuneration. Instead, it comprises of a “thorough assessment” to decide long-term expected return, which will then be proposed to the President who will conduct an independent assessment with the help of advisors.

“Ultimately, the Government evaluates the performance of the two entities based on their long-term returns, net of all expenses incurred,” said Mr Wong. He added that the returns can be looked at their annual report.

Although Temasek Holdings does not reveal the salaries of its top management in its annual report, a part of its website shows the compensation structure, where it is benchmarked against relevant markets and includes incentives and clawbacks based on performance.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Use of preschoolers and primary school students: Doesn’t PAP’s Sun Xueling violate the Parliamentary Elections Act too?

A two and the half minute political campaign video showed multiple scenes…

MDA’s actions “not the best way”: MARUAH on TRS closure

Singapore human rights group MARUAH has issed a statement to state it’s…

王乙康质问辅助金福利从哪来? 民主党林文兴:“从部长薪金下刀”

昨日,在《8视界》的新加坡大选2020政党论政首场辩论会,民主党马西岭-油池候选人林文兴,重申该党竞选宣言的建议,让65岁以上退休人士能够每月领取500元收入,同时还要为不幸被裁员的人士提供福利。 “有钱拿国民当然很高兴”,但人民行动党王乙康质问开销如此之大,钱应该从哪里来? 民主党林文兴直言不讳地说,不如先从部长薪金开始?他指出从民主党所作出的调查显示,内阁部长的薪金若能获得削减,最少都能省下1千万至1千200万元开销,这意味着,庞大的资金已经能够为至少2000位最贫困的老人提供每月500元生活费。 林文兴:“先从部长的薪金下刀” 此外,民主党认为政治领袖应该以身作则,为人民做出贡献,尤其疫情时刻,一起度过难关。 再者,民主党主张将国家一些重大项目停止,如星耀樟宜等,因为项目的建设并没有获得理想的回报,并直言如同浪费纳税人的钱。 王乙康则对民主党的“部长减薪说”不认同,他认为即使砍部长薪金,也是杯水车薪,无法真正补给老人补助的开销 林文兴:中小企业并未如王乙康所说获得补助 另一方面,林文兴也亦质问王乙康,有关就业补助金的补助金,尽管人民行动党宣称提供给中小企业的补助都已经进入到企业内,但前进党在走访民间时,发现中小企业并未如王乙康所说,获得补助金,造成企业的资金紧缩,因此人民行动党应该解释其补助金的分配详细百分比。 对此,王乙康则称就业补助旨在削减开支,保住员工的饭碗,因此纳入到企业的开支。就业补助并非以企业的大小规模而定,而是一视同仁。 林文兴总结时强调,人民行动党在疫情前已漏洞百出,并暗指行动党如今无法取得民众信任。然而,民主党与行动党最大差异在于民主党旨在聆听人民的心声,是将人民的福祉和福利摆在首位,因此让为民思虑的在野党进入国会,让人民的心声也能够被听见。

Singapore general insurance sector in deficit due to $28m underwriting loss in 2019

In 2019, Singapore’s general insurance industry slid into red as it suffered…