The casino levies at the Resorts World Sentosa and Marina Bay Sands in Singapore have been increased from S$100 a day or S$2,000 a year to S$150 and S$3,000 a year just last month on 4 April.

“The daily and annual entry levies serve to deter casual and impulse gambling by locals and are part of a holistic suite of social safeguards,” Second Minister for Home Affairs Josephine Teo said in Parliament on Monday (6 May).

Mrs Teo, who is also Manpower Minister, pointed out that even before the $9 billion expansion plans of the two Integrated Resorts (IR) started operations, the number of local visitors to the casinos dropped by 50 per cent between 2010 and 2018.

Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC Member of Parliament Alex Yam asked Mrs Teo of the amount collected since the introduction of the entry levy and its effectiveness in deterring gambling problems.

She replied that around S$1.3 billion in casino entry fees were paid by Singapore citizens and permanent residents (PRs) between 2010 and 2018.

Based on the gambling participation survey done every three years by National Council on Problem Gambling (NCPG), the probable problem and pathological gambling rate of Singapore residents had declined from 2.6 per cent in 2011 to 0.9 per cent in 2017.

Mr Yam also enquired if the annual levy removed to further discourage gambling problems.

“The data is quite clear – annual entry-levy holders tend to have higher incomes,” Mrs Teo said, maintaining that the annual levy would be kept for now. “For these affluent individuals who want to visit casinos often, such as premium players, the annual entry levy provides convenience.”

Apart from the levies, Mrs Teo also stressed that the government has incorporated other social safeguards as measures of deterrence, including an exclusion order for the financially vulnerable.

“If you’re under the exclusion order, then no amount that you offer will get you through,” she added.

In a reply to a separate parliamentary question by Bukit Batok SMC MP Murali Pillai about casino-related crime, Mrs Teo notes that the annual number of cases decreased about 58 per cent – from 299 to 126 cases between 2010 and 2018.

This shows that the casino-related crime situation in Singapore is “under control” and has continued to improve since the casinos commenced operations in 2010, she said.

She added that there have been fewer than 20 cases linked to organised crime groups in the last decades, with the amounts involved ranging from S$14,000 to S$1.3 million.

Most of the casino crimes are “opportunistic and petty in nature”, such as cheating, theft of gambling chips belonging to other patrons at the gaming tables, as well as the stealing of cash, valuables and unattended bags.

Mrs Teo assured Mr Pillai that the police and the Casino Regulatory Authority (CRA) “actively manage” law-and-order concerns and monitor the possibility of syndicates.

“To prevent infiltration of criminal elements into the casinos, CRA licenses casino employees and subjects them to stringent checks. Police exchange information with their counterparts in other countries on the latest casino-related crime trends and persons of interest,” she elaborated.

On the other hand, Minister for Social and Family Development Desmond Lee vouched that Singapore’s casino safeguards are “among the most stringent in the world”.

In response to questions from MP Seah Kian Peng (Marine Parade GRC), Mr Lee said there are preventive measures in place, as well as targeted and “upstream” measures to address problems in gambling.

“The objective of the existing social safeguards is to try to minimise the negative impact of gambling by targeting the problem gamblers and the financially vulnerable,” he said.

For instance, those who are financially vulnerable such as undischarged bankrupts, recipients of government financial aid or residents in HDB rental flats who have six months or more of rental arrears are barred from entering casinos and betting online with Singapore Pools.

Moreover, many locals have voluntarily excluded themselves from the casinos, slot machines in private clubs and opening an online account with Singapore Pools by registering under the self-exclusion scheme.

The NCPG also has powers under the Casino Control Act to limit the number of visits an individual can make to the casino each month.

Besides that, the authorities are working with the IRs “to implement technology to provide patrons with information to allow them to make informed decisions on their bets and better control their gambling expenditure”.

Casino gaming staff will be equipped with training as well to better identify and provide assistance to customers who are at risk of gambling problems.

These measures have helped reduce problem gambling in the resident population to only 1 per cent, Mr Lee said, adding that the government plans to introduce more preventive measures.

It’s clear that Mrs Teo said that by increasing the entry levy to casino, it had help to deter gambling problems. However, many netizens think otherwise and question the relevance of increasing the levies if it did help to control gambling issues among locals. Others commented on Channel NewsAsia’s Facebook page and said that it’s better for them to go to casinos at other countries as it will be more worth it. However, Steven Low opined that regardless of high the government increases the entrance fee, gamblers will still find their way to go to casino.

As for the S$1.3 billion collection from entry fees between 2010 and 2018, online users are urging the government to use the money wisely and help the people, especially the older citizens. In addition, one netizen named Xi Du wondered why PM Lee said the government does not have enough fund to sustain medical schemes. although they have a large amount of money collected just from casino’s entry fees.

 

On the other hand, Melvin Sim pointed out that gambling problems have not stopped even with the increase in casino entry levies. This is because the damage that it had done on gamblers is too much as they will end up running away or hide from loan sharks, leaving their family to deal with the taunts and harassment. He added that there are many gambling social problems that is still happening in Singapore ever since the casinos were opened, which the media don’t report on.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Two Singaporeans aged 86 and 95 dies from COVID-19 complications; COVID-19 death toll in August reaches 15

The Ministry of Health (MOH) in its daily update on Wednesday (25 Aug)…

6 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; No locally transmitted case

As of Saturday noon (10 Jul), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…

陈川仁吁重新审视老龄化叙述 惟国内老少面对退休积蓄困境

随着我国逐渐步入老化社会,老龄化问题也随之引起许多议论,针对相关课题,人民行动党乐龄小组主席陈川仁表示,应该重新审视围绕在老龄化周边的论述。 上周日(13日),陈川仁受邀出席人民行动党乐龄小组为国际老年人日举办的纪念活动,在致词中敦促,新加坡人应透过各项社区活动与个人参与,将新加坡变成适宜老年长居与养老的地方。 他随后也向记者透露“立国一代”(Merdeka Generation)如今却被视为是一个挑战或社会问题,并表示与“立国”的意义有所不同。 “让我震撼的是“立国”一字,原有自由和独立的意义,但为什么如今却将它视为是生活的另一个阶段,所以我们需要改变它。” 他也透露人民行动党推出新手册协助老年人更好理解相关社会政策,如老年员工公积金缴款率、及解释最新政策。此外,陈川仁也称老年员工在零工经济(gig economy)下持续参与工作,可改变老年人的负面印象。 临时工泛指在工作场所里非正式雇用的劳工,通常以日薪计酬。 也不像正式劳工能够享有退休金与每月最低工资的保障。 “你可以想象如果我们有能力养活自己,我们可以在自己的生活中实现自由独立的原则,这是一件多么令人兴奋的事情。就如当初“立国一代”的名号,为了能够实现自由和独立的原则。” 高生活成本老人吃不消 但果真如此吗?近年来,老龄化问题持续被讨论,亦经常在众多报导中看见,生活成本的提升与退休积蓄不足,经常迫使他们重返工作岗位。…

EU to Singapore: Reinstate moratorium, abolish death penalty

By Howard Lee The European Union has responded yesterday to the recent…