Earlier this week, on Tuesday (30 Apr), Facebook user CharLowe LC posted a series of videos together with a photo on Facebook group 50 Shades Blacker (Singapore) capturing a man who stripped down to his underwear, lying down along a HDB corridor right outside her home.

In the post, CharLowe LC asserted that the man is a drunk stalker who frequently loiters along the corridor, shadowing other women in the block, and even had attempted to break into her flat on several occasions.

To her dismay, she also claimed that the man was later let off the hook by the police as the police assumed he was just drunk. She added that the police told her that the man is staying at a nearby block.

Here is a screenshot of the post:

The first video, which was captured from inside CharLowe LC’s flat, shows the man lying on the floor of the corridor right outside, wearing only a black shirt and underwear.

As the video progresses, the man can be seen fidgeting around while moaning, and later placing his hand on his crotch.

The second video shows the man removing his shirt as he continues to stay on the floor, only in his underwear.

The third video shows the man being confronted by two police officers, while still appearing topless.

The last video shows the man being ushered off the premise by the police officers.

However, it is unclear what transpired after the incident was filmed, with regards to whether the allegedly drunk man was apprehended or escorted back to his own block.

According to the police, they were alerted to a case of public nuisance at Block 150 Ang Mo Kio Avenue 5 at about 12.50am. Further investigations are currently ongoing.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PTC approves biggest fare hike since 1998 while SBS Transit's net profit surges 70% to record $80m

The Public Transport Council (PTC) announced yesterday (8 Oct) that starting 28…

洞察行动党政策疏漏、勇于发声者 都被对付

源自作者人权律师张素兰 本周二(22日),我和数位友人一同在金文泰警局外,等候《新叙事》创办人覃炳鑫。他日前因涉嫌在未经授权下发布与选举相关的付费广告而助理选举官通报,警方随后也传唤他。我们无法得知何时被举报。 根据本月18日选举局的声明(选举过了的两个月后),大选期间,脸书接到通知需撤下五个与选举相关的“付费广告”。这些广告费共花了341元。覃炳鑫说,这些广告只是为了推广其中的帖文,包括一视频内有性感的声音重复“自由裁量权”(discretion)。 然而,总理公署似乎仍不满足于撤下五个付费广告。在他们获得压倒性胜利后的两个月(即93席位中赢得83席),现在开始向覃炳鑫追责。 张素兰:大选大获全胜,为何仍“赶尽杀绝”? 为何人民行动党表现地如此不合常理和充满报复性,耗费公帑调查这类琐事。即使所有的“广告”被法院认定为非法选举活动(这是不太可能的),对选举又有何用?人民行动党不能滥用纳税人的钱来满足他们的自大。 大部分的人甚至都没见过或听说过这些所谓的“广告”。我必须承认,其中一视频在选举期间出现,确实提及“自由裁量权”一词,而且是个精准的讽刺。但我也必须说,我并没有见过其余四个广告,即使我也是一名《新叙事》的订阅者。 即使如此,人民行动党在大选中的压倒性胜利,足以证明广告并未对结果有任何影响,其影响甚至是微乎其微,那为什么总理公署不让事情就这么算了? 我只得出一个结论。 这是行动党身上不幸和令人悲伤的特征。他致力于保障自身的利益和生存,不顾国人权益,即便他们希望享有一些基本人权如言论自由。行动党希望不惜一切代价维护权力。 因此,众所周知,他们被戏称为“霸凌者”。人民行动党必须确保所有能够看见他们政策漏洞,或是勇敢发声的人,都遭到对付(put down)。这是新加坡的悲哀。为什么我们的政府必须要肆意破坏这些有才能的新加坡人?…

【选区检讨报告出炉】林鼎:些微调整也要耗时八个月?

对于选区选区范围检讨委员会报告在上周(13日)公布报告,本社采访不同在野党领袖的看法。其中人民之声党领袖林鼎律师揶揄,看起来选区划分的调整相对轻微,不明白为何上述委会要八个月来完成? 尽管委会检讨工作没有设下时限,不过回溯2006年和2011年,选区范围检讨委会用了四个月时间提交报告。委会的成立旨在检讨选区划分,也是迈入大选前的例行工作,一般而言,公布选区划分报告,坊间都会视作即将选举的信息。 他认为,当前我国可能面对独立以来最严峻的疫情考验,报告可以在去年底就完成、发布,却选择在这个节骨眼才公开。 林鼎指出,但委会用那么长时间才交出报告是前所未有的,“或许他们不想让反对党有机会走基层宣传政见?这是令人遗憾的。” 身为律师的林鼎也说明,假设有法官判词太短、或理据不足,还会被上诉庭说“有违自然公正(nature justice)”,但选区划分报告却对于其中的更动也未有给予解释。 “反观在英国,会解释选民为何选区边界更动,甚至选民觉得这些变动不公,还可以告到高庭要求检讨。” 有鉴于此前政府已更新防疫措施,例如超过250人出席的活动受促延后或取消。林鼎质疑若当前若召开选举,可能是行动党“刻意的策略”,也会影响到选举期间的集会,最终民主成了最大输家。 至于总理早前释放信息,称如果选举提早举行,意味着将要在“风口浪尖”下,选出获得全新委任和新任期的政府,可以与国人合力面对当前艰巨挑战。 对于这种“需要获得全新委托”的论述,林鼎则斥责,现届政府任期可以到明年1月,之后他们还有三个月的时间召开选举。那么当前的疫情又如何“影响到”他们获得执政的托管权呢? 我国来届选举最迟须在明年4月前召开。

Khaw says it’s miserable to Govt when one stays in hospital because of subsidies but yet SG subsidises the least

At a grassroots event yesterday (24 Mar), Transport Minister Khaw Boon Wan…