When debate around the proposed fake news bill was starting to gain more and more traction with various experts and members of the public loudly voicing their concerns over the overarching powers that the bill would afford to ministers, Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugan gave an interview with Channel NewsAsia (CNA) to clarify certain points of concerns.

He has said, “The people who need to be concerned are the people who profit from and peddle in falsehoods,” adding that “99% of the people don’t have to worry about what they do 99% of the time.”

The article was then shared by the Prime Minister’s wife, Ho Ching on 15 April on her Facebook page who added the comment, “Of course, the purveyors of fake news will object, right?” So Ho Ching is saying that only those who are guilty will object to this law, fearing that the law would be used to prosecute them.

Now, can we use that same logic over questions of transparency when it comes to Temasek Holdings, the company in which Ho Ching is a CEO? For years the public have been trying to figure out the specifics of how much Ho Ching and other top Temasek leadership makes but that detail is still being withheld.

Back in June 2018, blogger Phillip Ang speculated that it could be somewhere around $100 million a year. Others were speculating as well, guessing at perhaps $24 million or even $1 billion. Unfortunately, no one can be certain of the actual figure because Temasek doesn’t reveal its financial statements.

In fact, Temasek Holding is an exempt private company under the Singapore Companies Act which means the company isn’t required to publish audited statutory consolidated financial statements. It’s even stated on the Temasek website:

Screenshot of Group Financial Summary from Temasek’s website.

So going by the same argument used by Ho Ching that only ‘purveyors of fake news’ would object to the propose fake news law, then only those who have something to hide would be against transparency, right?

Wouldn’t public companies that have nothing to hide not fear revealing their records and or fear calls for transparency?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Former bus driver shares audio of conversation between SBS Transit employee and participant of lawsuit against the company

An audio has surfaced on social media where an SBS Transit employee…

Did SMRT and LTA hide defects of China manufactured trains?

FactWire News Agency, a watchdog news organization has just released an exclusive…

Netizen spots AsiaOne’s article that had praised WP’s Jamus Lim was altered to commend PAP’s Vivian Balakrishnan as well

Workers’ Party (WP) candidate Jamus Lim was praised by many netizens over…

降雨量打破1997年记录 上个月为百年来最干旱7月

新加坡气象局周四(8月1日)指出,自1869年降雨量记录开始以来,上个月是我国最干旱的7月。 据樟宜气候站显示,上个月记录的总降雨量为12.2毫米,打破了1997年7月创下的18.6毫米记录。 气象局报告中指出,上个月也是自1929年气象记录以来,我国出现的第二最高温月份。 每日最高温介于28.7摄氏度至34.5摄氏度之间。 樟宜气候站的月均气温为29摄氏度,仅低于2015年7月月均气温的29.1摄氏度。 上个月的月均最低温度为26.9摄氏度,刷新了2015年7月份的记录,当时的记录为26.7摄氏度。 当局表示,预计本月前两周的气候将和7月的最后一周一样热,温度预测介于26至33摄氏度之间,但有些日子的气温有可能会超过34摄氏度。 夜晚的温度也是温热潮湿,最低温度约为28摄氏度,偶尔会有阴霾。 偶尔会有烟霾 当局指出,“最近数天观察到在苏门答腊中部和加里曼丹南部地区,有烟霾的热点”。 “根据目前的风向和火灾位置,我国可能会在本月的首两周内,偶尔有烟霾出现。”