When debate around the proposed fake news bill was starting to gain more and more traction with various experts and members of the public loudly voicing their concerns over the overarching powers that the bill would afford to ministers, Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugan gave an interview with Channel NewsAsia (CNA) to clarify certain points of concerns.

He has said, “The people who need to be concerned are the people who profit from and peddle in falsehoods,” adding that “99% of the people don’t have to worry about what they do 99% of the time.”

The article was then shared by the Prime Minister’s wife, Ho Ching on 15 April on her Facebook page who added the comment, “Of course, the purveyors of fake news will object, right?” So Ho Ching is saying that only those who are guilty will object to this law, fearing that the law would be used to prosecute them.

Now, can we use that same logic over questions of transparency when it comes to Temasek Holdings, the company in which Ho Ching is a CEO? For years the public have been trying to figure out the specifics of how much Ho Ching and other top Temasek leadership makes but that detail is still being withheld.

Back in June 2018, blogger Phillip Ang speculated that it could be somewhere around $100 million a year. Others were speculating as well, guessing at perhaps $24 million or even $1 billion. Unfortunately, no one can be certain of the actual figure because Temasek doesn’t reveal its financial statements.

In fact, Temasek Holding is an exempt private company under the Singapore Companies Act which means the company isn’t required to publish audited statutory consolidated financial statements. It’s even stated on the Temasek website:

Screenshot of Group Financial Summary from Temasek’s website.

So going by the same argument used by Ho Ching that only ‘purveyors of fake news’ would object to the propose fake news law, then only those who have something to hide would be against transparency, right?

Wouldn’t public companies that have nothing to hide not fear revealing their records and or fear calls for transparency?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

朝野政治领袖祝福刘程强早日康复

今日(3日),工人党发文告告知,该党阿裕尼集选区议员刘程强,上月30日家中跌倒,头部受伤,目前仍在加护病房接受治疗和观察。 文告提及刘程强意识清醒,家属希望大家给予私人空间,让他可安心静养。 朝野政治领袖获悉此事,都不约而同发文祝福刘程强早日康复。包括新加坡前进党秘书长陈清木医生、副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰、民主党、人民党、內政部兼国家发展部高级政务次长孙雪玲,以及交通部兼卫生部高级政务部长蓝彬明医生等人。 陈清木医生在脸书表示:“我与刘程强及其家属同在,祈望他能早日康复。” 王瑞杰在脸书表示,闻悉刘程强因受伤入院,也希望后者能尽快康复,愿他重返国会。 孙雪玲:他是我的长辈 孙雪玲也在脸书贴文,回忆在上一次国会,叮嘱刘程强当前疫情多注意健康,他也视后者为长辈:  民主党: 人民党: 人民力量党秘书长吴明盛则在贴文回忆,2001年加入工人党,刘程强也是他的第一位政治启蒙导师,在许多政治基础和学习上从前者身上得益良多。特也祝福后者早日康复。

How should Indonesia and the Muslim world respond to Macron’s statement?

JAKARTA, INDONESIA — Indonesia’s Muslim organizations staged a protest in front of…

美国现首起狗狗确诊感染冠状病毒

美国出现首起狗狗确诊感染冠状病毒19病例。 据全国广播公司(NBC)4月28日报道,居住在北卡罗莱纳州(North Carolina)杜克大学(Duke University)儿科教授麦克利恩(Heather McLean)与丈夫及儿子证实确诊。 而当局则派员到家中样本抽取包括两只宠物犬与家猫,经测试后,其中一只宠物犬对病毒检测呈阳性反应,成为美国首只感染冠状病毒的宠物犬。 尽管它是美国首只感染病毒的宠物犬,但已非先例。 早前,香港也曾出现感染新冠病毒的宠物犬,据港媒报道,狗狗已于3月份死亡,但因主人不愿让人解剖,死因不明。 除了狗狗,美国也曾出现老虎确诊感染了新冠病毒,是全美国首例确诊动物感染新冠病毒的病例。 据《BBC中文网》报道,确诊感染的老虎为4岁的马来亚雌虎,叫纳迪亚。 动物园官方称,纳迪亚和另外3只老虎、3只非洲狮出现干咳和食欲下降症状,经过检测,纳迪亚的结果为阳性。 美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)的指引提到,目前无证据显示动物是传播新型冠状病毒的主要途径,但呼吁民众不要让宠物与家庭外人士或动物接触。…