by James Leong

The Monica Baey saga disturbs me on many levels, especially how the university’s counsellors responded to their students’ cries for help.

According to a Yahoo report, a student said a counsellor told her not to speak up in public after she was interrogated by two male staff and one female staff. No psychologist was brought in and she was accused of being inconsistent. In a separate case, a woman who fell victim to voyeurism was given a rape whistle by the campus security, and counsellors attending to the incident had told her not to report the offender in order to give him a chance to be rehabilitated.

“National University of Singapore (NUS) leadership does not understand the trauma that victims face,” according to a tweet posted by Kellynn Wee, research associate of NUS’ Asia Research Institute, who attended an NUS townhall meeting to address the saga.

What’s disturbing is how individuals and organisations trained in the business of “understanding” trauma to help others are doing just the opposite—whether intended or not. What’s even more disturbing is how this phenomenon is not new. In Jan 2016, Benjamin Lim 14, fell to his death from his Yishun flat after being questioned by police about allegations he had molested an 11-year-old girl. Although the coroner’s report did not find anything that was not in accordance with police or school processes, it did highlight how the school counsellor Karry Lung did not accompany Lim to the police station. Nor did Lung exercise discretion when he “uninvited” him to a school camp via a phone call instead of a personal visit.

How could its counsellors not learn from this episode which occurred three years ago? How many more Benjamin Lim-type cases do we need before things change? Or god forbid should there already be cases which have gone unreported?

The Monica Baey saga has exposed the ugly behaviour of prestigious Singapore institutions, which hide behind the fancy mission and noble value statements. The anger is really the loss of trust and the betrayal of an educational institution tasked to shape young hearts and minds. Apparently, our young are astute enough to spot this contradiction and recognise it as a systemic failure of the university instead.

But this systemic failure has already happened at all levels of society, and it is driven by fear. The fear of losing your job, not belonging, feeling accepted and affirmed. The fear of, “I’m not enough”. Sadly, this fear I speak of has now seeped into the helping profession as well—the counsellors, police and administrators–the very same people we turn to for help.

James Leong is a private counsellor who addresses fear and anxiety at listenwithoutprejudice.org

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Tin Pei Ling’s social mobility: the exception, not the norm

Jeffrey Lawrence Omar/ Faced with the possibility of actually voting for once…

ERP rates revised for gantries along AYE and BKE

The Land Transport Authority (LTA) has said that it completed its quarterly…

11寸木头留排水管内“纪念” 堵塞害苦组屋住户捞污水

早前有住户揭发组屋部分结构以报纸作填充建材,质疑组屋监管品质;此次又传出盛港一组屋单位,厕所污水从排水孔外流事件,住户一家忙活八小时,舀出百桶污水,从早忙到晚,饭都吃不下。 根据《联合晚报》报导,事件发生在上周六(本月1日),盛港万国弯第988A 组屋七楼的单位。住户曾德良向该报申诉,早上起床要用厕所,惊见排水口不断涌出污水和排泄物,厕所变成臭气熏天的“炼狱”。 他赶紧叫醒妻儿帮忙清理,但污水流出速度很快,不一会儿就流出睡房和客厅,他们赶紧掏出毛巾衣物等堵住厕所门和房门,避免家中木制家具被浸泡损坏。 只要楼上有人用厕所,污水就会从排水口溢出。曾德良以为把污水舀进马桶拉水就可冲出,谁知一拉水,大量污水又倒灌,根本冲不走。 住户立即联系市镇会人员前来维修,直到下午三时许,水管才成功疏通。 曾德良无奈表示,他们才搬过来一年,却遭遇这种事。他们双手双脚整天都接触污水,从早忙到晚本应饥肠辘辘,但处在臭味中实在食不下咽。 谁留下30公分木头在排水管内? 经市镇会调查,才发现是有30公分的木头阻塞了楼下污水槽的中央排水管,取出后,住户曾德良家中排水才恢复正常。 一些网民看了此新闻后感到诧异,何以有30公分的木头可以堵塞在中央排水管中?一般是因为乱丢垃圾(例如避孕套、卫生棉和布料等)进马桶,才会造成的水管阻塞,但整支30公分长的木头,就不可能从马桶冲走了。 网民Nicole Lee就提出,“别惊讶,也许是装修承包商工人所为!我本身就曾碰过类似事件(装修工人将物品丢进排水口或马桶)!我和家人等装修工人放工后去检查装修进度时,发现在抽水马桶底部竟有混凝土!”…

HK: Civil servants angry with govt asking them not to wear masks while med experts explain why masks needed

Earlier this month, Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam caused a stir…