Aerial view of crowded Singapore high rise apartment skyscraper buildings.

Based on a survey conducted by PropertyGuru Group, it was revealed that Singaporeans are now being more positive about the property market due to the increased in affordability, ease of getting financing, good long-term prospects and government policies.

The results, which came out in the leading property technology company’s bi-annual Consumer Sentiment Survey, was conducted on 643 people in Singapore and more than 3,400 respondents across Southeast Asia.

It was said that while 88 percent of the Singaporeans surveyed believe that property prices are high and 72 percent expect these to increase in the next six months, a significant proportion (66 percent) see 2 property in Singapore as not only affordable but also good value for money.

In fact, 64 percent shared that they are able to buy a home at the current prices and within their current incomes, with 27 percent intending to buy a home in the next year.

“With prices in the private property market starting to see declines from cooling measures, and the HDB resale market remaining flat, buyers are likely to consider entering the market in 2019. Furthermore, with at least 40 new launches expected to hit the market this year, private property buyers will have plenty of options to choose from. Despite macroeconomic uncertainties, we see from our sentiment survey that there remains a firm belief in the long-term potential of Singapore’s property market,” said Jeremy Williams, Chief Business Officer of PropertyGuru Group.

The survey also found out that 41 percent of the respondents indicated satisfaction with Singapore’s real estate climate due to the long-term prospects for capital appreciation, stable real estate market and local economy.

What is even more interesting is that more than half of the respondents who are satisfied with the real estate climate are PMEBs (Professionals, Managers, Executives and Businessmen) aged 30 to 49 years, drawing medium to high incomes and are married with children.

“Many within this demographic group have experienced what we call the ‘first bite of the cherry’, having made some money when selling their matrimonial home that has enabled them to upgrade to their next home. As such, these individuals are most likely to view real estate as a means of growing their nest egg for the future,” Mr Williams added.

However, for 39 percent of those surveyed, restrictive government policies remain a matter of contention and there is rising dissatisfaction not only with increasing property prices but also with small unit sizes that come with these high price tags.

If that is not all, those who are thinking of upgrading to private property, positive perception rose the highest for executive condominiums (ECs) by 6 percent as these are available at relatively affordable prices compared to increasingly expensive condos. ECs are also a favourable option for middle income families who aspire to own private homes and enjoy long-term capital appreciation prospects.

Adding to the good news, the survey also found out that more young Singaporeans are moving out of their family homes earlier. At least 24 percent of millennials who moved out of their parents’ homes were aged 27 and below, with two in three respondents owning their first property between the age of 28 and 34 years.

This is could be due to the rise of co-living concepts where people rent or purchase properties together, lowering the price of the overall unit and making it more achievable.

However, PropertyGuru advices property seekers, particularly first-time buyers, to time their purchases to the ebb and flow of property prices and policy changes, such as cooling measures and property tax rates.

In addition to assessing future prospects of the preferred location, the company also recommends that buyers have sufficient savings for a down-payment and are able to service their property mortgage loan in the long-term – after accounting for renovation, stamp duty and setting aside six to 12 months of salary for emergencies.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

路透社:马国去年10月实施海沙出口禁令 或影响大士港填海

根据《路透社》引述马来西亚官员消息指出,马国自去年10月开始,禁止出口海沙到新加坡,可能影响开发大士(Tuas)巨型港口的填海工程。 路透社指两名马国高级官员透露,在马国首相马哈迪上任后五个月,就实施上述出口禁令,因后者不满海沙出口被一些腐败官员牟利,再者马国土地被用来扩展狮城海岸。 至于马国首相新闻秘书恩迪沙兹里( Endie Shazlie Akbar,)也确认,马国政府去年禁止出口沙子,是为了打击非法走私沙子的行为,但不是因为马哈迪不满狮城的填海计划。 路透社称,为避免外交风波,马国政府并未公开上述禁令。 另一方面,新加坡国家发展部未直接回应有关马国沙子出口禁令,仅强调我国有多个国家供应沙子来源,政府也一直鼓励该行业减少对沙子的依赖。 至于不愿具名的两位新加坡沙子进口商,表示沙子来源越来越稀缺,我国甚至必须远从印度进口,导致成本增加,单单运输费就是进口沙的最大单项成本。 他们透露,近年新加坡囤积沙子,以缓解突发的供应瓶颈。 由于沙产业不透明,也没有国家价格参照,致使很难衡量禁令对马国经济的影响。 联合国数据:去年狮城进口马国近六千吨沙子 根据联合国商品数据库(COMTRADE),2018年,新加坡从马国进口5千900万吨沙子,费用高达3.47亿美元,着占了新加坡在2018年沙子进口总量的97巴仙;占马国全球沙子销售量的95巴仙。不过,数据并未明细分出沙子种类。…

电视论坛与人民互动 网民对财长回答大不满

新加坡财政部长王瑞杰在星期一(2月18日)发布2019年预算案后,他于星期二(2月19日)出席了一个预算案电视论坛,让民众有机会就预算案内容向部长提问。 长约一小时的论坛中,王瑞杰听取民众提出有关各种主题的问题,例如相关的预算案好似一个大选预算案、立国一代配套(Merdeka Generation Package)如何鼓励保持身心健康活跃的生活,以及新加坡的出生率。其他民众也表达了他们对高昂生活费,以及中产阶级缺乏福利保障一事表示担忧。 超过500留言表达不满 有关的电视论坛在亚洲新闻频道(CNA)脸书上直播。留言区充满了网友向部长提出各种项目的问题,以及他们对王瑞杰的回答表示不满。 在亚洲新闻频道(CNA)脸书直播过程中,共获得超过500个留言,许多人质问公积金的提款年龄。失望的是,有关的问题并没有得到解答,因为并没有现场观众对王瑞杰提问此事。 质疑消费税增加 在发表2019预算案时,王瑞杰表示政府计划在未来数年,将消费税从7巴仙调高至9巴仙。针对这个事项,一位市民提问道,政府是否能吸纳食物等必需品的消费税。王瑞杰回答说:“在我们推出消费税前,我们已经非常仔细地研究过这个项目。最近这个课题再次引起争议后,我又在研究了一遍”。 然而网民对此回答并没有感到很满意,他们质疑消费税的调涨,甚至呼吁废除消费税。 财案没照顾中产阶级 除此之外,有民众表示新加坡的生活费持续增长,他问财政部长,政府是否会采取一些措施,帮助没有被纳入立国一代配套的群体。王瑞杰指出,政府需要保持成本低廉,这是很重要的,而且可以通过很多方式来达到这一目标,例如拥有一个开放和具有竞争力的系统,来自世界各地的进口货物,以及保持一个强壮的经济体。…

指覃炳鑫谎报资历 陈华彪轰特委会”人格谋杀“

国会研究蓄意散播假消息特选委员会,在报告中指出,历史学者覃炳鑫“撒谎、自抬身份“、罔顾那些否定他虚假指控的资料,事后也没遵守自己的承诺,说明自己如何已间接核实了相关资料,才作出指控。 覃炳鑫虽有提供口头陈述,但是委员会以前者歪曲自身学术资历为由,不是可靠的供证者,完全不考量他的意见。 律政部长兼特委会成员尚穆根向媒体表示,委员会的结论是,覃炳鑫谎报自己的学历和学术职位,因此他的陈述不可信。 覃炳鑫也辩称冷藏行动不存在对国家的安全威胁,当他被质疑时,却承认没有阅读或没有将马来亚共产党资深党员的论述考虑在内。最后覃炳鑫也没有提供文件,跟进他所提出的论述。 对异议者的人格诋毁 此事也立即引来公民组织的炮轰。前学运领袖、流亡异议份子陈华彪就批评,这是针对我们最优秀、最勇敢公民的另一次人格诋毁行动。 “新加坡的统治集团,真的往污秽的地沟钻。现在被行动党诬陷为骗子,竟然成了一种荣誉的勋章。尚穆根、选委会和你的跟班们,都应该感到可耻。” 他直言,如果行动党非得以这种手段来延续权力,只能祈求上苍保佑新加坡。 “要不然,只有人民才能把国家从这群卑鄙小人的手上拯救过来。” 覃炳鑫资历受牛津大学认可 许多网民都替覃炳鑫抱不平,也把今年四月,由牛津大学东南亚项目信托人的联署声明,上载到留言中。声明中称,覃炳鑫是东南亚项目协调员,也是信托委会成员之一,他是研究新加坡上世纪50-609年代独立斗争的历史学家。 ”自2011年在牛津大学完成博士学位以来,仍继续进行研究,特别是审视英国政府在当代的文件,并向大众发表其研究发现。“…

The language of our forefathers – are we missing something?

By Zyberzitizen It’s been decades since we were urged to “Speak Mandarin”…