Despite lauding the National University of Singapore (NUS)’s swift response to its students’ call to convene a town hall meeting regarding on-campus sexual misconduct on Thu (25 Apr), the university’s Students’ Union (NUSSU) was “extremely disappointed” by how the meeting was held.

The NUSSU Executive Committee highlighted in a Facebook post on Fri (26 Apr) that the meeting “did not meet its original intentions of sharing its investigative and disciplinary procedures and the sanctions framework for sexual misconduct”.

Another issue raised by NUSSU is the panellists’ inability to “answer students’ questions adequately”, as they are not a part of the Review Committee on Sexual Misconduct.

Vice-Provost (Student Life) Florence Ling and Dean of Students Peter Pang were part of the panel during the town hall on Thu, and had addressed 500 students at an auditorium, CNA reported.

NUSSU, in its statement, mentioned that it has submitted a formal request to the University’s President Tan Eng Chye to “convene another town hall with members of the Review Committee on the panel as part of their report crafting methodology”.

“This is to ensure that students can receive committal answers from individuals who have decision-making power in the committee, and that their voices are heard,” said NUSSU, in light of Thu’s town hall meeting, which it said “did not allow for an extension”.

Despite its criticisms, NUSSU praised the University’s “plans to establish a centralised victim support unit and improve security infrastructure in halls and residential colleges”, in addition to “following through on our suggestions to enforce anonymity and include counsellors on standby”.

The town hall meeting on Thu, which received mixed reactions from its attendees, was convened in the wake of the high-profile sexual harassment case involving NUS undergraduate Nicholas Lim Jun Kai’s act of filming fellow student Monica Baey while she was showering in a Eusoff Hall bathroom, her hall of residence, last Nov.

Ms Baey’s revelation of her case via a string of Instagram Stories had sparked numerous debates on the role of authorities such as the Police Force and university administrative boards in handling cases of sexual harassment on-campus, particularly in terms of providing the appropriate structures to support and protect victims, and has spurred call to action in the form of petitions, including one calling for Lim’s expulsion from NUS.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Resorts World Sentosa: Petition by 650,000 people to let dolphins go not received

We reproduce here in full the letter by ACRES Executive Director Louis…

“一天过一天,平平安安就好.”

“As long as I have hands and legs, I will go and work.” Deborah Choo.

New citizens outstripping net increase of existing citizens?

Singstat’s Population Trend 2009 Report reveals shocking information. Leong Sze Hian

马国国会再通过废除《2018年反假新闻法令》

马来西亚国会下议院再次通过废除《2018年反假新闻法令》。 根据《东方日报》报导,马国会下议院以记名投票的方式,最终以92票支持51票反对,三读通过《2019年反假新闻(废除)法案》。 《2018年反假新闻法令》是在2018年4月2日,由国阵政府提呈并获得通过。希盟政府上任后提呈废除法案,虽然在去年8月16日下议院三读通过《2018年反假新闻(废除)法案》。 《2019年反假新闻(废除)法案》是由首相署部长拿督刘伟强提呈。 反对党国会议员在辩论环节时,仍全力支持必须保留《2018年反假新闻法令》。 希望联盟执政后,兑现希盟宣言里的承诺,废除《2018年反假新闻法令》。而国会下议院在去年8月16日,三读通过《2018年反假新闻(废除)法案》。 惟该法案再被带往上议院时,却在去年的9月12日,被上议院以28对21票驳回,以致《2018年反假新闻法令》废除不成。 至于马来西亚为何要废除《反假新闻法令》,要回到去年希盟政府开始执政后,声称现有法律已足够应对假消息传播的问题,例如1998年通讯与多媒体法等。 马国首相马哈迪表示,如果制定法律限制人们表达意见,恐怕亦可能遭政府滥用。 该法曾在去年提出废除,但遭马国上议院否决。