On 29 June 2005, India and Singapore signed the India-Singapore Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA). This free trade agreement not only enables Singapore and India to trade goods freely, it also allows professionals to work in each other country more easily.

The CECA was concluded after 13 rounds of negotiation and the Singapore’s side was led by none other than Heng Swee Keat, the current PM-in-waiting, who was then Permanent Secretary for Trade and Industry. Heng and his team essentially did the ground work together with their Indian counterparts. They then presented their proposals to the politicians for approval.

Some of the areas covered by CECA include: Improved Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreement, Trade in Goods, Customs, Investment, Trade in Services, Intellectual Property, etc.

However, controversial ones include concluding further Mutual Recognition Agreements (MRAs) so as to facilitate the freer movement of professionals between Singapore and India. It helps to recognise each other’s education and professional qualifications so that Indian and Singaporean professionals from the following five professions could be able to practise in each other country:

  1. Accounting and auditing
  2. Architecture
  3. Medical (doctors)
  4. Dental
  5. Nursing

Already, Singapore now recognises degrees of Indian doctors and nurses from certain Indian universities.

Movement of Natural Persons

Then, CECA also enables movement of persons between both countries. In particular, professionals employed in 127 specific occupations will be allowed entry and stay for up to 1 year or the duration of contract, whichever is less.

Also, intra-corporate transferees (i.e. managers, executives and specialists within organisations) will be permitted to stay and work in India and Singapore for an initial period of up to 2 years or the period of the contract, whichever is less.

The period of stay may be extended for period of up to 3 years at a time for a total term not exceeding 8 years.

In theory, of course, CECA could also benefit Singaporean professionals wanting to work in India but how many Singaporeans really want to work there to earn in rupees?

Indian companies try to exploit CECA loophole

After CECA was signed, some of the Indian IT companies set-up in Singapore tried to exploit the “intra-corporate transferee” loophole so as to get more Indian IT workers to work here. They would hire them in India and then “transfer” them to their Singapore subsidiaries to work, without the need to hire any Singaporeans.

This is because in Article 9.3, it said:

“Neither Party shall require labour market testing, economic needs testing or other procedures of similar effects as a condition for temporary entry in respect of natural persons upon whom the benefits of this Chapter are conferred.”

That is to say, economic needs testing like Singapore’s fair consideration framework which ensures fair hiring of Singaporeans cannot be applied to “intra-corporate transferees”. To top it all, Article 9.6 even allows the “intra-corporate transferees” to bring their spouses or dependents into Singapore to work.

India unhappy with Singapore

By 2017, thanks to CECA, large number of Indian professionals especially those in IT sector were moved into Singapore as “intra-corporate transferees”, since CECA did not set any quotas. Few Singaporeans, if any, were hired.

Many Singaporean PMETs started filing complaints of discrimination to the Manpower Ministry through the Fair Consideration Framework. The Singapore government was forced to slow down the approvals of Indian professionals to work here.

“This (visa problem) has been lingering for a while but since early-2016, visas are down to a trickle. All Indian companies have received communication on fair consideration, which basically means hiring local people,” the president of Nasscom, the IT association of India, complained.

In retaliation, the Indian government decided against expanding the scope of goods where import duties for Singapore goods would be cut unless the concerns of Indian industry are addressed, the Times of India reported.

In particular, the Indian government is against Singapore using the “fair consideration framework” to regulate the employment of Indian professionals in Singapore. “They (Singapore) are doing it despite the CECA clearly stating that there will be no ENT (economic needs test) or quotas on agreed services. This is a violation of the agreement,” warned an Indian official.

Obviously, when Heng negotiated CECA with India prior to 2005, he had not foreseen all these issues facing Singaporean PMETs. Perhaps he cared more if GIC and Temasek could invest freely in India or if DBS could open more branches there?

Nevertheless, Heng was confirmed to be appointed DPM of Singapore on May Day. Opposition member Lim Tean has this to say to Heng, the current PM-in-waiting, “Heng Swee Keat should explain his role in CECA, which cost Singaporeans jobs! What is the benefit to Singapore of CECA?”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

WP’s Jamus Lim shares analogy about a rich man, illustrating Govt’s poor reasoning for GST hike

Workers’ Party (WP) Member of Parliament (MP) Jamus Lim took to Facebook…

“怪”标题标签精神压力女佣 客工层层剥削   媒体视而不见

上月26日,《联合晚报》刊登一则25岁女佣闹跳楼的新闻。报导中描述事件发生在蔡厝港地区的组屋,指出这名女佣爬出八楼单位的窗外,站在墙檐,惊动拯救队人员到场,拯救企图自杀的女佣。 据该报导,记者采访女佣的雇主陈楚萍,后者称女佣名为卡斯罗,来自印尼,在六周前刚来工作,开工不到两天就出现怪异举动,常望着窗外发呆,且只喝水不进食。雇主告知记者,以为女佣还在适应新环境,也耐心教导她如何做家务。 女佣不谙英语,为此雇主以谷歌翻译和女佣沟通。“某次,她看见女佣连洗个碗都有气没力,好意提点女佣,岂料女佣竟趴在沙发上哭了一个多小时。雇主打电话向代理求助,沟通后女佣还是不开心,独自躲在房间角落里缀泣。” 事发当天只有20多岁的雇主儿子和女佣在家,女佣爬出窗外,儿子也尝试劝他入屋并马上报警。警员和民防队员到场,灾难拯救人员则攀绳而下从窗外把女佣就回屋内。惟女佣在企图自杀罪名下被捕。 该篇报导并未引述专业拯救人员或心理医生意见,但却打着:《怪女佣开工两天不进食  第六周竟闹跳楼》的标题,引起维权份子范国瀚不满,谴责该标题太刻薄,女佣面对的是精神压力,但是编辑却设误导性的标题,把她描述成神经古怪、没有理性之人。 “加深对精神患者刻板印象” “精神健康是重要的社会问题,这种故事只是进一步加深对精神衰弱患者的偏见和刻板印象。” 《联合早报》也被批评,以耸动标题来骗取读者阅读量,却对社会不同群体缺乏敏感度。 针对有网民评论,常常有女佣闹跳楼,谎称被“鬼上身”,欺瞒雇主以便能早点离开新加坡,范国瀚表示不认同,他认为这种说法并没有考虑到这些家庭女佣面对的情绪和心态,“是不是有无法跨越的苦难?他是不是精神上有很多压力,或者有不敢说出来的恐惧?” 他补充,遽下断语之前,媒体必须推究事理,而不是急于责怪工人。 长工时、不给假日,当女佣奴隶…

被指“违反社交距离” 六名前进党成员走访时被记名

六名前进党成员于周日(21日)在拜访社区时,被指违反社交距离规定,被记下个人资料。 当他们一行人到武吉巴督31街第358组屋,拜访过程中,被一名安全距离大使,以及一名自称国家环境局官员的人士,记下他们的个资。被记名的前进党成员包括前进党准候选人袁麒钧。 此外,随同报导的记者要被索取个资,仅《海时》记者同意提供。而有关“官员”声称,是收到居民投诉,前进党等一行人聚在一家咖啡店,已超过五人的安全规定。 前进党成员也提出反驳,而“官员”仅表示,他们可以对罚款提出上诉。 而本社稍早时采访,前进党到蔡厝港拜访,发现尽管该党都已尽量维持五人一组,惟加上媒体人员人数都可能超过五人,这已不是该党可以控制的。 国家环境局澄清  “官员”仅是社区志工 据了解,国家环境局于周日发布文告澄清,指记录下前进党一行人名字的人士,并非来自该局,实则是该局的社区志愿者,或培训为保洁大使(SG Clean Ambassador)。 国家环境局补充,截至目前,仍未开出任何罚款,因此国家环境局也正针对此事进行调查,包括前进党成员是否如同报告所述,违反社交距离规定。 日前,选举局宣布竞选指南表示,一旦安全距离大使与执法人员发现任何候选人不遵守安全距离规定,当局将会采取行动,按照现行的安全距离指引执行,并强调候选人与一般公众并无区别。…

The Elephant In The Room

By Elijah Pear – The conventional argument runs like this: Without economic…