Minister of Education, Ong Ye Kung has just posted on his Facebook page on Monday evening to announce that he has spoken to the President of National University of Singapore and the Board Chairman to convey his concerns that the penalties NUS applied were manifestly inadequate in the recent sexual misconduct case.

Mr Ong went on to state, “From here on, for offences that affect the safety of students on campus, we have to take a tough stand, and send a strong signal to everyone.”

“Two strikes and you are out cannot be the standard application. NUS has to make its campus safe for all students, especially female students” wrote Mr Ong.

He wrote that NUS will review its discipline and sentencing framework swiftly and decisively and he is confident NUS’ review will result in a more robust process and stricter framework.

NUS in its earlier statement on Saturday, said that it will convene a committee to review the current disciplinary and support frameworks.

Mr Ong also noted that the NUS Board and President are seized with this matter, and are determined to put a stop to such unacceptable behaviour on campus and he has also asked other universities to review their frameworks for similar offences.

Last week, Ms Monica Baey, a NUS undergraduate, took to her Instagram account to call out the school for trying to protect the man who had filmed her in the shower.

According to her posts, Ms Baey had been filmed in the shower by a male student identified as Nicholas Lim. She made a police report immediately following the incident and the perpetrator was identified, along with CCTV and video evidence of him committing the act.

Unfortunately, following an investigation, the man in question was said to be only slapped with a 12-month conditional warning. She added that he will only be punished if he re-offends in the next 12 months.

Ms Baey furiously pointed out that this isn’t the first incident of its kind to happen at NUS, noting that many other women have fallen victim to being filmed in the shower.

When Ms Baey tried to appeal for a heavier sentence with the police, she was told by the investigation officer that that we should have to ‘just accept the outcome’. She added that the officer then said, “If you want real consequences or more action to be taken, go to NUS and push for action”.

Ms Baey said she did approached NUS to push for a stronger punishment from the school but the only thing they did was to forward her a letter of apology from the perpetrator.

Her sharing of her experience was widely reported on social-political platforms on Friday this week and stirred up the public, asking for the university to explain its actions.

A petition calling for the expulsion of Nicholas Lim from NUS has received more than 30,000 signatures as of Mon (22 Apr).

The petition, started by Wayne Wee and whose sister and girlfriend are NUS students, observed that Ms Baey’s case “is just one of many that have been swept under the rug over the past decades by NUS administration unwilling to admit that they are unable to tackle the scourge of men in their halls seeking sexual gratification and using their female schoolmates as a means to that end”.

Separately, a statement signed by 489 former and current NUS students was sent to NUS staff members, in which they had voiced their concerns regarding the university’s approach towards sexual harassment, “particularly in reference to the case where a female NUS undergraduate student, Ms Monica Baey, was filmed while showering without her consent”.

While members of public were elated to see a Minister finally making his appearance, some voiced their concerns about his choice of words, in particular, “from here on”

Minister Ong is the first Minister publicly making a comment about the scandal, while Minister of Home Affairs, Mr K Shanmugam has not made any statements about the decision of the police to simply issue a 12-month conditional warning to the perpetrator.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

要小贩营业超过12小时? 读者批社企“现代奴隶制”

从2015年开始,国内至少有七座小贩中心,以社会企业模式经营。 本地有114做小贩中心,在2027年前,还会增减13座小贩中心。不过根据卫生部兼环境及水源部高级政务部长许连碹博士,日前在拜访淡滨尼综合站小贩中心时,曾对媒体表示,未来是否会继续沿用社企模式,还有待评估。 早前有小贩反映,他们在这些社企经营的摊位,被征收附加费用,例如高达1千200元的中央清洗碗盘费。而一般社企小贩中心,管理层所征收的中央洗碗盘费用,约介于600-800元。 淡滨尼综合站小贩中心,也被誉为首个24小时营业的小贩中心。 事实上,就有读者在两年前,在咖啡店集团旗下子公司OTMH,于2016年11月正式接管淡滨尼小贩中心前,致函本社申诉,有关社企管理层对小贩们的要求,形同要落实“现代版的奴隶制”。 当时,有关读者有意申请该小贩中心摊位,于是联系社企OTMH公司,被告知业者需至少营业12个小时,最长24小时。 鼓励小贩经营超过12小时 这意味着,要实施现代咖啡店24小时不打烊概念,管理层可以要求摊主们拉长经营时间,也更倾向于把摊位租给愿意长时间工作的小贩,最好是能24小时、每周七天都营业。 读者认为,小贩和其他辛勤工作的新加坡人一样,也需要休息和休假,他们也要陪家人子女。压榨小贩们的劳动和时间,剥夺他们应有的休息,藉此最大化小贩中心的盈利。 该读者也质疑,为何审核小贩申请资格的不再是环境局,而全权交给有关社企公司。 他认为,完全由该公司自行决定而不是公开招标,有欠公平。这是因为小贩中心是用公款建设,政府才是拥有者,社会企业只是管理小贩中心的代理人。 “为何他们(指社企)可以被赋予如此多自由,在不公布遴选过程的情况下,来自行选择小贩?”…

Charity Xmas performance by Cathay Pacific

Post by theonlinecitizen. 300 Cathay Pacific Frontline Team comprising Cabin Crew, Cockpit…

Why fares should double and other ideas for a better transport system

~By: Gordon Lee~ In this article, I outline a total rework of…