The National University of Singapore (NUS) has issued a statement on Saturday, saying that it will convene a committee to review the current disciplinary and support frameworks. This is in response to the allegations by an undergraduate student about the inaction of the school regarding the complaint that another student filmed her at the showers.

Ms Monica Baey took to her Instagram account on 18 April to call out the school for trying to protect the man who had filmed her in the shower.

According to her posts, Ms Baey had been filmed in the shower by male student. She made a police report immediately following the incident and the perpetrator was identified, along with CCTV and video evidence of him committing the act.

Unfortunately, following an investigation, the man in question was said to be only slapped with a 12-month conditional warning. She added that he will only be punished if he re-offends in the next 12 months.

Ms Baey furiously pointed out that this isn’t the first incident of its kind to happen at NUS, noting that many other women have fallen victim to being filmed in the shower.

When Ms Baey tried to appeal for a heavier sentence with the police, she was told by the investigation officer that that we should have to ‘just accept the outcome’. She added that the officer then said, “If you want real consequences or more action to be taken, go to NUS and push for action”.

Ms Baey said she did approached NUS to push for a stronger punishment from the school but the only thing they did was to forward her a letter of apology from the perpetrator.

Her sharing of her experience was widely reported on social-political platforms on Friday this week and stirred up the public, asking for the university to explain its actions.

The statement signed off by Associate Professor Peter Pang, NUS’ Dean of Students wrote,

“We are sorry for Miss Monica Baey’s distressing experience, which is of extreme concern to the University. We are in the process of reaching out to her to offer our support and assistance.

What has been committed is senous and investigated by the Police and we understand that the male student concerned received a 12-month conditional warning from the police

When such offences are committed, the NUS Board of Discipline. which comprises student and faculty representatives, will also conduct its own disciplinary proceedings.

It will consider factors such as the severity of the offence. the need for justice for the victim, the rehabilitative needs of the student offender, the safety of the NUS community, and also the decisions and penalties imposed by the authorities.

We hear the concerns expressed by members of our community and the public about having a safer and more supportive campus environment. and recognise that advances in camera technology can be easily abused.

NUS President will convene a committee to review the current disciplinary and support frameworks. This committee, which will have representation from the NUS Board of Trustees, will study the approaches taken by other international institutions, and solicit views from various stakeholders. We expect to share the findings of the study and follow up actions in the new academic year.”

TOC has written to Ms Baey for her response on the statement issued by the NUS.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PSP will not be fined for alleged violation of safety measures during walkabout, says NEA

No fines by the National Environment Agency (NEA) will be issued to…

Frontline staff shares account of how his family has been harassed by neighbour from hurling vuglarities to spraying of disinfecting solution at them

A nurse shares the ordeal that his family has been undergoing for…

淡马锡与GIC包括薪酬等运营决策 黄循财:政府不干涉

第二财政部长黄循财在国会声明,新加坡政府投资公司(GIC)与淡马锡控股(Temasek Holdings)向来都是独立运作,政府并未干涉两间公司的运营决策,如薪资待遇。 工人党议员方荣发于国会中询问,对于新加坡政府投资公司的主权基金与淡马锡控股及国营投资者是否有薪资上限,而部长黄循财则回应政府不干涉两家公司的营运决策。 黄循财同时也是国家发展部长与新加坡政府投资公司董事会成员。 部长并没有透露两家公司的高级领导人的薪水,反而说明政府给予该两家公司的董事会高度期待 ,希望他们各自均有杰出的表现。 尔后,议员方荣发特别要求公开近五年来两家公司中,三名拥有最高工资的主管,其薪资、年薪以及分红。 同时,部长黄循财则回应,部分的工资因随着长期的工作表现与行业标准而进行调整,并支持“审慎管理风险文化(prudent risk-taking culture)”。 方荣发也进一步阐述,两家公司都有管理人民大量储备金之责,而政府是唯一的股东;通常股东会了解公司内部的薪资待遇。 尽管过程中受到议员方荣发的步步询问,部长黄循财仍拒绝透露两家公司高层工资,并以“已经有程序来决定报酬”来回应。他表示,基于两家公司过去的表现,该报酬程序是有效运作的。…

M’sians criticise Dewan Rakyat Deputy Speaker’s statement on needing 28 days’ notice from PM to reconvene Parliament

Parliament does not have the power to convene by itself without prior…