Singapore maintains its ranking in Reporters Without Borders’ (Reporters Sans Frontières – RSF) World Press Freedom Index as the Republic takes the 151st spot again this year.

An increase of 0.46 points from 51.41 points last year, however, was also noted. An increase in points indicates a decrease in press freedom, according to the Index.

RSF, in its analysis on press freedom in the Asia-Pacific region in 2019, attributed Singapore’s ranking to its emulation of what the international non-governmental organisation had dubbed as “China’s anti-democratic model”, which “has established self-censorship as the norm” via “total news control”.

Citing China’s President Xi Jinping’s amendment of the constitution to allow a lifetime tenure in March last year, RSF stated that “the ruling elite” in China “suppresses all debate in the state-owned media while cracking down relentlessly on citizen-journalists who try to make a dissenting voice heard”.

“China’s anti-democratic model, based on Orwellian high-tech information surveillance and manipulation, is all the more alarming because Beijing is now promoting its adoption internationally.

“As well as obstructing the work of foreign correspondents within its borders, China is now trying to establish a “new world media order” under its control,” RSF observed.

It also charged that “Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s government is always quick to sue critical journalists, apply pressure to make them unemployable, or even force them to leave the country”.

“Defamation suits are common and may sometimes be accompanied by a charge of sedition, which is punishable by up to 21 years in prison,” added RSF.

The Singapore government, it noted, via the Infocomms and Media Development Authority, “has the power to censor all forms of journalistic content”.

“As a result of judicial and financial pressure from the authorities, self-censorship is widespread, including within the alternative independent media,” said RSF, adding: “The situation worsened significantly in 2018, with serious charges being pressed against five independent news websites and at least seven journalists and bloggers”.

“The Singaporean authorities have also started sending journalists emails threatening them with up to 20 years in prison if they don’t remove offensive articles and play by the rules,” charged RSF.

Singapore’s ranking in the World Press Freedom Index for 2019.
Source: Reporters Without Borders/RSF

Meanwhile, RSF noted that across the Causeway, Malaysia has ascended the rankings by 22 places at the 123rd spot this year, with a decrease of 10.67 points from 36.74 points last year.

https://twitter.com/seapa/status/1118802124987482112

RSF has cited the political upheaval on 9 May last year as the reason for the improved score.

It noted that while press freedom has received “a breath of fresh air in Malaysia after Prime Minister Najib Razak’s ruling coalition suffered a surprising defeat in the May 2018 general elections”, the Malaysian government now still has, at hand, “a draconian legislative arsenal with which to suppress media freedom, an arsenal that includes the 1948 Sedition Act, the 1972 Official Secrets Act and the 1998 Communications and Multimedia Act”.

“Under these laws, which need a complete overhaul, the authorities have strict control over publication licences and journalists can be sentenced to 20 years in prison on sedition charges. They pose a constant threat to media personnel, who still cannot express themselves with complete freedom, despite all the progress,” cautioned RSF.

Nonetheless, it added that “Mahathir has kept his promise to repeal the Orwellian provisions of the anti-fake news law adopted by the outgoing government”, and that press freedom in Malaysia in general has shown marked improvement within such a short span of time.

“Journalists and media outlets that had been blacklisted, such as the cartoonist Zunar and the Sarawak Report investigative news website, have been able to resume working without fear of harassment.

“The general environment for journalists is much more relaxed, self-censorship has declined dramatically and the print media are now offering a fuller and more balanced range of viewpoints including support for the new ruling coalition led by Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, and support for the old ruling coalition, now in opposition,” said RSF.

It added that Malaysia’s improved score points at “the degree to which political change can radically transform the climate for journalists, and how a country’s political ecosystem can directly affect press freedom”.

The Index ranks 180 countries and regions according to the level of freedom available to journalists, and acts as “a snapshot of the media freedom situation based on an evaluation of pluralism, independence of the media, quality of legislative framework and safety of journalists in each country and region”.

 

Map view of the 2019 World Press Freedom Index. Source: RSF

 

The following are the points and colour classifications used in the Index:

From 0 to 15 points: Good situation (white)

From 15.01 to 25 points: Satisfactory situation (yellow)

From 25.01 to 35 points: Problematic situation (orange)

From 35.01 to 55 points: Difficult situation (red)

From 55.01 to 100 points: Very serious situation (black)

However, the Index does not rank public policies “even if governments obviously have a major impact on their country’s ranking”, and it is not indicative of “the quality of journalism in each country or region”.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Over 200 fines to be issued for breach of elevated safe distancing measures, says MEWR

More than 200 composition fines will be issued to members of the…

居民问责白沙-榜鹅市镇会:是否动用公款聘请天价律师达文星?

一名白沙-榜鹅区居民,致函询问白沙-榜鹅市镇会(PRPTC),在使用市镇会款项用于与居民利益无关的诉讼、聘请律师时,是否已咨询居民的同意? 曾代表人民力量党于2011年参选蔡厝港议席的李子旭,揭露一名住在白沙-榜鹅区的友人,致函其市镇会提问四个问题: 市镇会是否能未咨询居民同意,擅用大笔款项,用在非市镇用途? 市镇会可否对居民隐瞒有关大笔款项的资讯? 市镇会在聘请律师时,是否货比三家律师报价? 市镇会是否违反了自身条规? 李子旭说,其友人表示,致函提问白沙-榜鹅市镇会,主要是要问责,既然该市镇会聘请了新加坡最贵的律师达文星,是否有动用市镇会的款项? 诉讼案的中心人物—诉方律师达文星,乃是行动党籍大巴窑集选区前议员,也是已故李光耀和总理李显龙的王牌律师,为他们在诉讼案中打败过多名对手,包括邓亮洪、徐顺全、博客鄞义林,以及多家外国媒体如《经济学人》、彭博社和《纽约时报》。 市镇会:诉讼仍进行不回应 但是,两周前电邮给市镇会的询问仿如石沉大海,即是这名居民反复拨电给市镇会,得到的答复也只是“不会针对审讯中的诉讼作回应。” 李子旭把该居民的经历分享在脸书,让更多人知道此事,一同问责该市镇会是否有合理使用公款。 居民质问聘请达文星律师费…

Body of Singaporean male found, suspected to have drowned while kayaking in Malaysia

A 30-year-old man who fell overboard and swept away by the river’s…

MOH preliminarily confirms 344 new cases of COVID-19 infection ; Total tally at 31,960

As of Monday noon (25 May), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…