A member of the public Whing Yeok Leng wrote to ST Forum 2 weeks ago (29 Mar), asking the CPF Board to consider letting CPF members to defer their monthly payouts after 70 years old if they wish to.

“The CPF Retirement Sum Scheme allows CPF members to voluntarily defer the start of their payouts up to a maximum of age 70. That is of concern to me,” she said.

She said that she has a friend who turned 70 last year and was allowed to defer her monthly payout but only on appeal.

“The Central Provident Fund Board should allow members turning 70 this year to continue to defer the start of monthly payouts if they choose to do so, until such time when they need the money,” she suggested.

“It makes no financial sense to make it mandatory for such members to have to accept the monthly payouts, only for them to redeposit the money into a bank.”

She added that the interest rate earned is much lower in a bank, compared with the CPF interest of 4 per cent to 6 per cent.

MOM: CPF savings meant for retirement income

Sim Feng-Ji, Divisional Director of Income Security Policy Division of the Manpower Ministry replied on ST Forum today (9 Apr).

Mr Sim said that since Jan last year, the CPF Board started automatic payouts for members when they turned 70 years old.

“Since that announcement, the Board has received appeals from some members who, at turning 70, wished to continue retaining their savings in the CPF to enjoy above-market interest rates,” he said.

However, deferment of payouts beyond 70 years old is only granted on a case-by-case basis to members with lower balances, he said.

Mr Sim implied that those who have much more than the Full Retirement Sum in their CPF account would generally not be granted.

He added, “The CPF is designed to provide members an income in retirement, rather than serve as an alternative investment instrument.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

蓝彬明抱怨送餐员问题被政治化 吴明盛反驳“让7千人丢饭碗才严重”

本月12日,交通部高级政务部长暨盛港西单选区议员蓝彬明,会见约300名使用电动滑板车的送餐员。这些送餐员申诉电动滑板车禁令对他们的生计带来严重影响。 在一个多小时的闭门对话会上,送餐员提出许多意见,如让他们考取电板车执照,甚至在人行道上清楚划线区,分行人和电板车能使用的空间,并抱着当局可撤回禁用人行道禁令的希望。 蓝彬明医生认为,在基础设施未得到良好的提升前,目前还是必须以行人的安全为主,并表示不能接受另一起因电动滑板车相关的致命事故,但他随后也表明,政府仍然会认真看待送餐员生计,尽管目前提出了补救措施,但他也知道无法在一时间让所有人都满意。 不过,他在个人脸书贴文中也指出,现场有反对党成员将问题政治化和炒作在场人士情绪,认为“这是不负责任和可憎的。”,并指这么做对任何人都没有帮助,也在此时理应协助送餐员群体的当儿分散注意力。 虽然他未指名道姓,惟据出席者表示,有关反对党成员是人民力量党秘书长吴明盛。而吴明盛在早前的贴文也证实,自己在一些脸书网友的盛情邀请下,到两场行动党议员的对话会上“踢馆”。据了解他先是到贸工部兼教育部高级政务部长徐芳达,在大巴窑的会见选民活动,之后赶赴蓝彬明医生的对话会现场。 他表示自己在现场对蓝彬明医生提出疑问,指“没有十全十美方案”,车祸也常发生为何不见汽车被禁?也质问需检视个人代步工具对社会带来的效益,如果没有,禁之;如果有,则看看如何安全的使用。 他表示自己等候蓝彬明解答了民众的提问,后者也解释700万元津贴如何帮助送餐员等。当他要提出最后一道问题时,后者拒绝了。 “于是我问在场送餐员,他们是否要我问最后一道问题?他们喊道“要”。”吴明盛指若让送餐员把电动滑板车换成电动脚车,不过是把问题从人行道搬到马路上,让送餐员面对车祸事故的风险。 对于蓝彬明在脸书上的抱怨,吴明盛在脸书录视频反驳自己没政治化议题,反指“人们的温饱是政治,饭碗是政治,当你打破7千人的饭碗,那才是严峻的政治状况。”他也质疑让送餐员改用其他代步工具是否能解决问题。 在另一则中文贴文,他也反驳所谓他“煽动在场人情绪”的说法,反指是蓝彬明无法说服众人;而当后者不允许自己发问最后一道问题时,“我为了尊重与会者,特别问了他们到底要不要我发问,全场起哄喊要,我也只是遵从他们的意愿发问罢了。我何以“煽动”众人了?” 此外,他也认可个人代步工具也带来新的经济文化和商机,让一些家庭可以自力更生,减少社会问题;再者他认为送餐员等弱势群体需要一把声音来表达他们的困境,同时也批评当前政府拒绝去建设可供PMD使用的较完善基设。

新捷运、SMRT与新科工程合作 致力提升快铁维修能力

两家地铁业者新捷运(SBS Transit)和新加坡地铁(SMRT)将与新科工程合作,分享地铁维修和工程能力,其中包括地铁列车和信号系统内电路板的维修。 根据《商业时报》报道,周一(16日),新捷运和SMRT与新科工程签署合作备忘录时,交通部长许文远表示,签署备忘录是发展快铁工业的一小步。 许文远说,”签署备忘录等同于授权新捷运、SMRT与新科工程以具成本效益的工程支援地铁运作与维护。“ 他也表示,三方会基于共同利益,尽快确定与建立合作项目。 许文远指出,“合作旨在减少资源重叠的现象,与解决本地科技鸿沟的问题。” 首要的合作项目为旧轻轨的电路板。轻轨的电路板涵盖不同的功能,是轻轨与追踪仪器的重要信号。电路板的年久失修,可导致轻轨的故障。 “如今我們汇集了这方面的专家,我们可以更精准地确认和整修电路板,减少地铁故障的几率。” 截至目前,兩家地铁公司正积极增进相关电路板的问题,如新地铁在前几年便开始为解决电路板的问题,开办不同的研讨会进行讨论与整修。 当然地铁系统需要更复杂的修整,故将复杂的维护服务外包给专家如新科技工程或原厂设备制造商。目前已更换所有旧有的电路板。 自2011年地铁南北线发生严重故障后,SMRT扬言要尽快更换所有就有的电路板。故障当时经调查后发现,其主要故障原因为信号故障. 许文远说明,“自我加入交通部,我们便开始商讨各项解决方案。前两年致力于解决消防系统。偶尔需要处理水灾,甚至是雷击。…

SDP: Budget 2020 is “full of little tweaks and complex schemes but short on bold moves”; urges to stop GST hike

In response to Budget 2020, Singapore Democratic Party’s (SDP) chairman Dr Paul…

DBS makes net profit of S$2.8m in India in last fiscal year thanks to CECA

DBS Bank India Limited, the wholly owned subsidiary of DBS Bank has…