In a statement published by the Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) today (4 Apr), SPH said it welcomes the Government’s draft legislation to “deal decisively with the challenge of deliberate online falsehoods”.

“Given the vulnerabilities that exist in society, the measures proposed will help address a clear and present danger posed by those who seek to use new media platforms to spread misinformation and falsehoods deliberately,” SPH said.

“We had proposed that a level playing field be established for all media players in having to correct or take down online falsehoods, and welcome the moves to do so in the draft Bill.”

In its statement, SPH continues to propose an “independent fact-checking body” to decide on content which was deemed false. SPH proposed this during the earlier hearings of the Select Committee.

SPH explained that having an “independent fact-checking body” would lend credibility to the process in the eyes of the public.

In the end, the committee decided that the ministers would be the ones who would decide on content which was deemed false in the interest of “speed”. Such decisions can still be challenged in court, nonetheless.

SPH said, “While we understand the need to act quickly in some instances, we continue to believe that an independent authority would have provided a neutral avenue for content creators or news organisations to appeal to, short of resorting to a legal challenge.”

However, SPH did not elaborate who should be sitting in this “independent authority”. Still, it went ahead to support the Government’s draft legislation to tackle online “fake news”.

SPH editors “groomed to tow the line”

It’s not surprising that SPH would support the government’s position, in general.

According to a US diplomatic cable leaked by WikiLeaks several years ago (https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09SINGAPORE61_a.html), it was revealed that editors inside SPH were “groomed” to support the government.

For example, the leaked cable quoted Chua Chin Hon, then ST’s bureau chief for US, saying that SPH’s “editors have all been groomed as pro-government supporters and are careful to ensure that reporting of local events adheres closely to the official line”.

Chua said that unless one of the editors is a “Trojan Horse,” someone that for years has successfully concealed any non pro-government leanings, none of them has the courage to publish any stories critical of the government.

But Chua also admitted that he knew of no editors who had been fired or otherwise punished for printing articles critical of the government. That is because all of the them have been “vetted” to ensure their pro-government leanings, Chua said.

It also revealed that the lower-rung reporters are “eager to produce more investigative and critical reporting, but they are stifled by editors who have been groomed to tow the line”.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

新航工程合资公司裁员被指“激进” 引来职总介入纠正

服务之鹰亚洲公司(Eagle Services Asia)是新航工程(SIA Engineering)的合资公司。不过,近日却传出裁员风波,短短三日内多达144人被裁,令一些员工不满该公司手法“太激进”! 这也使得职总和工会不得不介入,并投票通过授权工会采取必要工业行动,以纠正有关公司的裁员程序。 新航工程在服务之鹰亚洲公司持股达49巴仙,至于飞机引擎制造商普拉特·惠特尼公司(Pratt & Whitney),持股51巴仙。 据职总秘书长黄志明表示,目前该公司与全国职总达成协议,确保裁员中最大程度留下新加坡雇员,外籍雇员也有作适当考量。 他称是在上周接到该公司反映,抨击服务之鹰亚洲公司裁员不公。为此,职总偕同航空职员联合会、新航工程师与执行人员联合会、航空交通执行人员联合会等各造,与有关公司进行谈判。 双方共同审查裁员名单,确保新加坡雇员获得最大限度保护。  

Healthcare vote to test ‘Trump rally’

By Margaret Yang, CMC Markets  US equities closed marginally lower as traders and…

Letter of complaint against TOC on Today

LATEST: TOC replies to allegations.

Some funding for international students is justified, but $238 million is on the 'high side', says MP Leon Perera

The government spends about $238 million on scholarships and tuition grants for…