Last Month, a federal jury ordered Monsanto, subsidiary of Bayer, to pay US$80 million to a 70-year-old Californian man with cancer, who had used its weed killer product Roundup for three decades on his land. The jury found that Roundup was a “substantial factor” in causing the man’s cancer. This was the second case Monsanto lost.

The first court case against Monsanto was held in a California state court last Aug. The court ruled that Roundup had caused the terminal cancer of a former school groundskeeper. The jury found that Monsanto had “acted with malice or oppression” and awarded the plaintiff US$289 million in damages. The damages were later reduced to US$78 million.

It turns out that it was Singapore’s Temasek Holdings which helped Bayer to acquire Monsanto. It was reported in Apr last year that Bayer sold 3.6 per cent stake to Temasek for 3 billion euros at 96.77 euros per share. The money is used as part of Bayer’s plan to takeover Monsanto. Together with its existing holding in Bayer, Temasek would then own about 4 percent in Bayer after the transaction. By Jun, with Temasek’s help, Bayer successfully acquired Monsanto to become the biggest seed and agricultural chemical maker in the world.

The active ingredient glyphosate used in Monsanto’s weed killer was classified by the World Health Organization as a probable human carcinogen in 2015. But Bayer continues to deny that Roundup could cause cancer and said on its website that the weed killer has been thoroughly tested, and “an extensive body of research” shows that products containing it “can be used safely and that glyphosate is not carcinogenic.”

More than 20 countries ban or restrict use of glyphosate

Glyphosate is by far the most widely used herbicide in the US, and probably worldwide. It is used on nearly every acre of corn, cotton and soybeans grown in the US.

But more than two dozen countries have banned or restricted its use. Among the latest – Los Angeles County announced last month that it was suspending use of glyphosate on county property until more is known about its health effects.

The following countries have issued outright bans on glyphosate, imposed restrictions or have issued statements of intention to ban or restrict glyphosate-based herbicides, including Roundup, over health concerns and the ongoing Roundup cancer litigation:

  1. Argentina
  2. Australia
  3. Belgium
  4. Bermuda
  5. Brazil
  6. Canada
  7. Czech Republic
  8. Denmark
  9. France
  10. Germany
  11. Greece
  12. India
  13. Italy
  14. Luxembourg
  15. Malta
  16. Netherlands
  17. New Zealand
  18. Portugal
  19. Slovenia
  20. Spain
  21. Sweden
  22. Switzerland
  23. UK
  24. Vietnam

On Singapore’s NEA website, it didn’t say anything about the use of glyphosate here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Two men arrested in connection to legless body at Syed Alwi Road

Police have arrested two male Pakistan Nationals, aged 25 and 43, in…

确诊保安员两日在妝艺值勤 人协称未接近表演者和观众

一名37岁策安(Certis Cisco)保安员,本月9日确诊患上新型冠状病毒。在入院前除了对两名武汉人发出隔离令,也曾到2020妆艺大游行值勤。 主办方人民协会(PA)向活动表演者和基层领袖,发Whatsapp简讯澄清,上述保安员至妝艺上值勤时,并未与任何表演者或观众有近接触(close contact)。 而人协也证实有关保安员一连两天(1月31日和2月1日)都有在妝艺活动上值勤,首日在靠近莱佛士道(Raffles Avenue)和湾景道(Bayfront Avenue)的交界处指挥交通。隔日,则在青奥运公园(Youth Olympic Park)一带充当流动值勤员。 人协的简讯也指表演者不会到上述地点,且该区的人流有限。“该职员在该区巡逻,且没与群众长时间互动。” 人协称与卫生部合作以评估情况,必要时将启动对接触者的追踪。 此前,策安机构向媒体表示,将协助当局调查和提供一些必要的协助,予这名确诊职员和家属。但当局未说明是否有为这位职员,在值勤时提供口罩,仅表示已采取广泛措施,确保职员在安全环境下工作,包括工作场所实施体温检测、经常进行消毒,以及让职员分组工作以减少接触。 根据卫生部文告,除了在妆艺大游行值勤,上述保安员也曾到过策安机构位于惹兰亚菲菲(Jalan Afifi)的办公处上班。他在上月31日开始出现症状,并于本月2日到诊所就医;6日前往邱德拔医院就诊并立即被隔离,于9日中午确诊。…

国人从未排外! 只求妥善管理外籍人才的流入

作者:Augustine Low 政府统计单位民情联系组(REACH)近日发布最新调查,结果显示多数国人同意对外国人保持开放的态度。 这无疑与各部长的声明相呼应,即呼吁国人应对外国人保持开放态度,与国际和外国人保有联系。 正如贸工部长陈振声近日所说,“新加坡深知对国外与世界保持开放态度的重要性,这永远都不会变。” 可是,他们不就是在陈述显而易见的事实,忽略问题的症结点吗? 国人向来并没有大声疾呼地完全排除掉外籍人士,而是要求对外籍人士的流入进行管理,确保新加坡人不在自己的国家内受到歧视! 一直有人哭喊必须消除不公平聘雇问题、解决外国PMET、调整就业准证和SPass的问题。简言之,新加坡人更希望获得一个平起平坐的机会,不需要顾及左右,危及土生土长的新加坡人的权益。 但从来都没有人在社交媒体上高喊,新加坡必须完全封闭外籍人士,以至于需要对大多数国人进行调查,征得国人同意,保证国家对外开放吗? 我们是否需要部长反复提醒我们新加坡需要对外开放,与国际保持联系吗? 对外开放是一码事,而国家充斥外籍人士是另一码事。这两者将还是有所差距的。 要么我们的执政者没有顾虑到这一点,要么是故意将其夸大,将外国人管理等同关闭国家外国人才入口,将情绪堆积到最高点。…