PM Lee officially opened Sengkang Hospital two weeks ago on 23 Mar. In his opening address, he said Singapore spends less on healthcare than most other developed countries, and yet able to achieve better outcomes than these countries.

“We have needed to spend less partly because our population was younger, and has only recently begun aging. But the main reason is because we have structured our system properly, and built in the right incentives to guard against over-consumption of healthcare services,” he said.

“We have to watch carefully how heavily the Government subsidises healthcare. Not just to save taxpayers’ money, but to avoid encouraging over-treatment by doctors and over-consumption of healthcare services.”

He added that in countries with very high subsidies or free healthcare, people worry less about their healthcare costs, and doctors also correspondingly prescribe more unnecessary and expensive tests and treatments.

Still, he said that Singapore’s healthcare expenditure is rising faster than the GDP. “Eventually, we cannot sustain this,” he said.

“So in the medium term, we have to find new ways to fund this healthcare spending… And we have to make hard choices and I hope we will have the support of Singaporeans when we make them.”

He did not say what sort of “hard choices” his government is going to make to fund future healthcare spending but in Feb this year, Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat has already told Parliament that the increase in GST (to 9%) is necessary in light of the needs in healthcare and other areas. It is slated to kick in some time between 2021 and 2025.

Singapore government spends less in healthcare because citizens spend more out from their own pockets

According to data from World Bank, the Singapore government actually subsidises the least among many countries when it comes to healthcare.

For example, among the 7 countries whose hospitals were ranked top 10 by Newsweek magazine recently, Singaporeans incurred the most out-of-pocket expenditure as a percentage of total health expenditure:

Out-of-pocket expenditure (% of total health expenditure)

  1. US 11.1%
  2. Germany 12.5%
  3. Japan 13.1%
  4. Canada 14.6%
  5. Israel 24.4%
  6. Switzerland 28.4%
  7. Singapore 36.7%

The out-of-pocket expenditure (percentage) was even higher than the average of the East Asia & Pacific countries. When the high income countries in this region were taken out leaving only the 3rd world countries in the calculation, Singapore’s out-of-pocket expenditure (percentage) was still higher than theirs:

  • East Asia & Pacific 26.1%
  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) 33.5%

In other words, Singaporean patients paid more from their own pockets as percentage of total health expenditure than even other 3rd world countries in East Asia & Pacific region, on the average. This also meant that the Singapore government subsidised the least.

The World Bank defines out-of-pocket expenditures as any direct outlay by households, including gratuities and in-kind payments, to health practitioners and suppliers of pharmaceuticals, therapeutic appliances, and other goods and services the primary intent of which is to contribute to the restoration or enhancement of health status. This definition can include transport costs for accessing healthcare and over-the-counter medicines and supplies, but does not include pre-paid fees for health-related taxes or insurance.

With the threat of paying high medical costs out from own pockets, it’s not surprising that some Singaporeans has even tried to commit suicide from inside a hospital (‘Woman attempted suicide in Changi Hospital, allegedly from her fear of facing possible high medical costs‘).

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

UN Human Rights Office for South-East Asia strongly condemns Singapore for execution of Malaysian national

The UN Human Rights Office for South-East Asia issued a strong statement…

Australia records significant fall in new virus cases

Australia’s virus-hit Victoria state reported a major drop in new coronavirus cases…

Historian Thum Ping Tjin opposes fake news law since “virtually anything can be deemed misleading”

Historian Dr Thum Ping Tjin told Yahoo News Singapore in an email…

杨莉明:若企业变相裁员,将可能被取消雇佣补贴计划与工作准证配额

人力部长杨莉明表示,一旦发现公司变相裁员,将可能会被取消雇佣补贴计划(Jobs Support Scheme)与工作准证配额。 杨莉明于今日(4日)在国会上答复议员提问,人力部已向企业表明,除非万不得已,才能裁员。 “即使在冠状病毒19疫情期间,无论企业是以什么名义终止雇佣关系,若没有及时填补空缺,将会被认定为裁员。” 对此,当局也针对变相裁员的问题,发布明确的指导原则。如果企业在雇佣合约内列出遣散费条款,雇主将需支付遣散费。 至于面临经济拮据的雇主,杨莉明则表示,劳资政三方也同意雇主可以重新商谈和调整资遣费。不过就算在艰难时期,这些规定也不应被搁置,企业是必须在有限的能力范围内,给予员工支持。 她也强调,裁员是企业的最后手段,公司应该以调整成本为主,因此人力部也要求雇主提交对企业所采取的节约成本措施,并协同劳资政公平与良好雇佣联盟(TAFEP)与公司进行会谈。 另一方面,雇主与员工之间的无效沟通也会导致员工认为自己遭受不公平的对待。她举例,一位私立学前教育中心的雇主在没有清楚向员工解释其经营状况下,要求员工休年假,让员工误会并对此感到不满,但经过调查,才发现该中心的运营收入出现问题,因此不足以在阻断措施期间支付薪资。 杨莉明表示,很多时候雇主并非要求不合理,因此无论是雇主或员工,也应该在艰难时刻建立信任关系,并保持有效沟通。