In the debate on hate speech held in Parliament on Monday (1 April), Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam spoke about the risks of hate speeches in Singapore, especially when it is considered derogatory, offensive or insulting to a particular race or religion.

An illustration of song lyrics deemed offensive was handed out during the parliamentary sitting and had gone viral overnight after it was shared by Workers’ Party Member of Parliament Chen Show Mao on his Facebook later that day.

The offensive lyrics included snippets from popular songs such as Nine Inch Nails’ “Heresy”, Ariana Grande’s “God Is a Woman”, Hozier’s “Take Me To Church” and Lady Gaga’s “Judas”.

The post received plenty of comments and questions from netizens with many of them asking whether these songs were examples of content that would be prohibited in Singapore.

In a Facebook post on Tuesday (2 April), Mr Shanmugam has clarified that the songs are not examples of content to be banned, but merely used as examples as part of his speech that not all content found offensive would be banned.

“People who did not listen to the speech may misunderstand that the list contains songs which have been banned (!) or are going to be banned (!)” he wrote. “All of that is untrue.”

“I made the point that people may find many things offensive. And gave the list as an illustration. Doesn’t mean that it can all get banned, just because some people find it offensive. That is also a point I made in the speech,” he explained.

Freelance journalist and Chief Editor of NewNaratif, Kirsten Han, shared a TodayOnline article of the news on Facebook and wrote: “Sure the songs won’t actually be banned, but the issue is that this stupid list exists in the first place.”

Mr Chen told Mediacorp in response to their queries that his post titled “Lesson of the Day” is to share something new he had learned that day. He commented on his post that “all the lyrics cited are deemed offensive speech” in the context of the ministerial statement.

However, he also included questions for consideration such as “should we allow unrestricted offensive speech in general mainstream discourse, in religion, politics, media and entertainment, even if it is not hate speech?” and “If we agree that there have to be restrictions on offensive speech even when it is not strictly speaking hate speech, what should be the extent of the restrictions?” etc.

He shared Mr Shanmugam’s response and TOC’s report on the news in the comments as well.

This was not the first time Singapore expressed their concerns over controversial song lyrics. Back in 2016, Madonna was not allowed to perform “Holy Water”  due to its “religiously sensitive content” during her first concert in the country, as part of the Rebel Heart Tour.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

避免丧失角逐国会议员资格 陈两裕:别罚款 宁愿坐牢

新加坡民主党领袖陈两裕于昨日(22日)的听证会上表示,他宁愿因藐视法庭罪被判入狱,也不愿被罚款5000元,以便能够角逐即将到来的大选。 根据《宪报》,凡是曾被判入狱至少一年,或被罚款超过2000元的国人,都丧失成为国会议员的资格。 陈两裕的辩护律师Eugene Thuraisingam对由五名法官组成的上诉庭表示,虽然法庭没有义务为陈两裕提供服务,但是他愿意接受更严厉的判决。“我正在要求法院行使酌处权,怜悯地让(准许)他入狱。” 因力挺范国瀚被罚款5000元 陈两裕于誌期2018年5月6日所发表的声明中,指总检察署因为不公对待社运份子范国瀚,而被控藐视法庭罪。 有关事件起因是有关范国瀚于当年4月27日,在脸书上帖文,指马来西亚法庭处理政治个案比新加坡司法更独立,导致被总检察署指控藐视法庭。而陈两裕当时就位范国瀚打抱不平,指总检察署的行为只证实了范国瀚的批评不虚,因此同样被控藐视司法罪 两人随后成为了首个于2017年10月生效的《2016年司法(保护)法令》下定罪的人士,各别被罚款5000元。 检控双方不满判决上诉 他们于周三返回法庭,因为总检察长对他们的判刑提出上诉,而两人也对他们被定罪和判处提出上诉。 代表总检察署出庭的副总检察长,莫哈末法伊扎尔(Mohamed Faizal…

新任马国国家元首是彭亨苏丹

马来西亚马来统治者理事会议决,由现年59岁的彭亨州苏丹阿都拉担任第16任国家元首,至于霹雳州苏丹,则再次出任副元首。 今日马来统治者遴选第16任国家元首,马国官媒《马新社》报导,统治者特別会议今日早上11时15分开始,出席会议的各州苏丹有霹雳州苏丹纳兹林沙、柔佛柔佛苏丹依布拉欣、吉打苏丹沙列胡丁、玻璃市拉惹端姑赛西拉祖丁、彭亨州苏丹东姑阿都拉、雪州苏丹沙拉夫丁、森美兰州最高统治者端姑慕赫力兹。 根据马国1957年擬出的国家元首论任顺序,在吉兰丹州之后,出任国家元首的第一顺位是彭亨苏丹,接著是柔佛苏丹和霹雳苏丹。 因此,彭亨州苏丹东姑阿都拉是第16任国家元首第一顺位人选。 早前,为了让彭亨苏丹能顺利担任国家元首,身体健康不佳的苏丹阿末沙退位,由其长子东姑阿都拉继位,以为他当选第16任国家元首铺路。 来自吉兰丹州的第15任国家元首苏丹莫哈末五世,於2019年1月6日宣布退位,为马国抛下震撼弹。他是马国首名在任期內退位的国家元首。