The Asian Internet Coalition has issued a statement in response to the introduction of the “Protection against Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Bill” in parliament, expressing their concerns that the proposed legislation is giving the Singapore government full discretion over what is considered true or false.

The statement reads as follow:

The Asia Internet Coalition (“AIC”) supports the Singapore Government’s goals of protecting social cohesion, harmony, and the integrity of institutions and political processes.

However, we are deeply disappointed by the lack of meaningful opportunities for public consultation during the drafting process of this bill, given the significant implications it could have for diverse stakeholders, including industry, media and civil society, in Singapore, the region and internationally.

We reiterate our position, which echoes that of many experts around the world, that prescriptive legislation should not be the first solution in addressing what is a highly nuanced and complex issue.

We are also concerned that the proposed legislation gives the Singapore government full discretion over what is considered true or false. As the most far-reaching legislation of its kind to date, this level of overreach poses significant risks to freedom of expression and speech, and could have severe ramifications both in Singapore and around the world.

AIC will be studying the bill in the coming days. We remain committed to working closely with the Government and other stakeholders to tackle misinformation, and hope that the enforcement of this legislation will not be at the expense of the benefits that public debate and exchange of ideas can bring.

AIC is an industry association comprising leading internet and technology companies. Its members are namely: Apple, Facebook, Google, Expedia group, Amazon, LINE, Linkedin, Rakuten, airbmb, Twitter, Yahoo! and Booking.com.

Read AIC’s earlier submission to the Select Committee on Deliberate Online Falsehoods

MinLaw: Bill is meant to protect society against damage from online falsehoods

Just yesterday, the Ministry of Law (MinLaw) tabled the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Bill in Parliament for its 1st reading. The ministry claims that the bill is seeking to protect society against damage from online falsehoods created by malicious actors and it targets falsehoods, not opinions and criticisms.

MinLaw says that the bill is largely about correction and will require the facts to be put up alongside the falsehood, so that the facts can travel together with the falsehood. Online platforms may also be required to ensure that those who previously saw the falsehood also see the correction.

According to MinLaw, the bill also enables the following measures that the government could take:

a. Take down of falsehoods in serious cases, to stop harm to society.
b. Disabling of inauthentic online accounts or bots that are spreading falsehoods against the public interest. This targets the use of inauthentic accounts or bots to manipulate and distort discourse amongst people.
c. Declaration of an online site that repeatedly spreads falsehoods, to cut off its ability to profit, without shutting it down. The online site must have, in the preceding 6 months, published three different falsehoods that are the subject of active Directions, meaning that each falsehood was against the public interest.

What is so troubling in the bill?

Based on the reading of the bill, the Minister can call upon the powers vested in him/her when there is a false statement of fact which has been or being communicated in Singapore or if the Minister think it is in the public interest to exercise the powers.

Despite being a bill to address online falsehoods, there is no definition in the bill to state what determines if a statement is false or who or what entity(ies) will determine the authenticity of the statement. This would mean the Minister can simply point at a statement of fact or any report, and say that it is fake.

The only way to contest the decision is an appeal through the High Court. However, the appeal does not absolve one’s duty to correct or remove the alleged false statement of fact.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

美国现首起狗狗确诊感染冠状病毒

美国出现首起狗狗确诊感染冠状病毒19病例。 据全国广播公司(NBC)4月28日报道,居住在北卡罗莱纳州(North Carolina)杜克大学(Duke University)儿科教授麦克利恩(Heather McLean)与丈夫及儿子证实确诊。 而当局则派员到家中样本抽取包括两只宠物犬与家猫,经测试后,其中一只宠物犬对病毒检测呈阳性反应,成为美国首只感染冠状病毒的宠物犬。 尽管它是美国首只感染病毒的宠物犬,但已非先例。 早前,香港也曾出现感染新冠病毒的宠物犬,据港媒报道,狗狗已于3月份死亡,但因主人不愿让人解剖,死因不明。 除了狗狗,美国也曾出现老虎确诊感染了新冠病毒,是全美国首例确诊动物感染新冠病毒的病例。 据《BBC中文网》报道,确诊感染的老虎为4岁的马来亚雌虎,叫纳迪亚。 动物园官方称,纳迪亚和另外3只老虎、3只非洲狮出现干咳和食欲下降症状,经过检测,纳迪亚的结果为阳性。 美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)的指引提到,目前无证据显示动物是传播新型冠状病毒的主要途径,但呼吁民众不要让宠物与家庭外人士或动物接触。…

WP’s Yee Jenn Jong challenges ESM Goh’s affirmation that GRC and town council systems are “stabilisers” for Singapore

Former Non-Constituency Member of Parliament Yee Jenn Jong disagrees that electoral divisions…

What we don’t need for exciting politics

Singapore does not need coups, demonstrations in the streets, people power, plots…

申诉遭非法扣押无礼对待 我国男子向马国移民局索赔267万令吉

我国一名男子对马来西亚移民局提出诉讼,要求赔偿他267万令吉(约87万6174新元),因为他遭“非法”扣押在一个过于拥挤的牢房中渡过37天。 将在今年7月迎来68岁生日的裘柏路易斯(Puis Gilbert Louis )指出,他于2018年10月9日晚上10时10分,在马来西亚柔佛住家被移民局官员逮捕后,就开始了此难熬的经历。 其代表律师阿伦卡西(Arun Kasi)在索赔声明中提到,裘柏拥有可逗留在马来西亚至2018年11月7日的有效签证,他和一名也持有有效签证的菲律宾籍女性友人,待在马国新山的住处。 该住家还有另外三人,但裘柏声称不知道其余三人的国籍。 裘柏认为,他可能是被怀疑涉嫌窝藏这三名疑是非法移民人士而被逮捕,但是被捕时也被告知原因。 裘柏指出,当他自住家被逮捕后,送到甘榜实达热带(Setia Tropika)移民局办公室时,相关官员也拿走了他的所有物品,包括手机、钱包、现金、住家钥匙、车钥匙和鞋子。而他随后成功用手机,通过脸书账号通知其家属和朋友有关被逮捕一事。 拘留中心生活环境恶劣…