(Left) Watain band (Source: Watain Facebook page) and (Right) Mr Colin Maxel Stringer (Source: Babu Dayanand Facebook account).

The issue of work passes is a contentious one in Singapore. There has been debate in relation to foreigners entering the country and questions in relation to the transparency of the laws and regulations governing this. Whether the laws governing this issue are suitable is the subject of another article. For the purposes of this article, I would like to focus on how fairly and evenly the existing laws are applied.

Recently, Swedish heavy metal band WATAIN had their gig cancelled at the last minute on the grounds that some of the band’s lyrics were anti Christian. Personally, I have never heard of this band and if the whole motive behind cancelling the gig was to prevent offense to Christianity, I would suggest that such cancellation was counterproductive given that the cancellation created much more publicity than the original gig for the band. But I digress.

If the law in Singapore is such that one cannot openly criticise a religion in Singapore, why is it that a Mr Colin Maxel Stringer, a guest speaker at New Creation Church (NCC), whose writings about Islam raised concerns among netizens had a valid work pass to enter Singapore to deliver a sermon here? Isn’t this a a case of double standards? Isn’t Maxel Stringer’s presence in Singapore to deliver a sermon potentially as offensive to Muslims as WATAIN’s gig in Singapore to Christians? What is the reason for the unequal application of this law in Singapore?

My personal belief is that religious tolerance is best enforced with education and understanding. Not by arbitrary blanket bans on expression. However, if this is indeed the law in Singapore that such acts be disallowed, then we need to ensure that the bans are equally applied in a way that protects all faiths.

While I am not suggesting that the inconsistency highlighted here is in any way deliberate, the effects of its inconsistency are unfair. If we had more transparent laws with concrete steps and clear processes that are easily accessible to the public, these kinds of unfairness can be avoided. Currently, cancellations and bans appear to be arbitrary at best and this needs to be changed.

If religious harmony is indeed as important as Minister for Law K Shanmuggam say, then it is important for all religions to be seen to be treated fairly.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

三个月接获65起骗局 警吁勿轻信声称“中国官方”来电

“Mr Soh接到了声称是来自新加坡电信的电话,他被告知其电信账号即将被终止。他非常紧张,以为自己卷入一宗犯罪事件。” 33岁的Mr Soh目前任职于一家批发公司,是马籍人士。当时他正前往亮阁商场,打算听从声称是来自中国政府的指示,将1200新元转账到中国户口,但因情绪失控的行为被两位警员发现,才得以阻止了这场诈骗事件。 据《海峡时报》报道,警方周一(1日)所公布的数据显示,自1月至4月期间,已接获65类似的诈骗案件,大部分与冒称中国官方机关的身份进行诈骗,涉及了至少480万新元的损失,其中有4万8000新元的损失与比特币自动柜员机有关。 大部分受害者如同Mr Soh,是华人。 乌节路邻里警局副局长Chang Lian Seng表示“ 受害者表现非常焦虑,在他领钱后,他直接冲往比特币自动提款机,这就是诈骗的迹象”。 受害者以中文表示,未来在遇到类似状况会先确认事情的缘由,再来做决定和打算。…

Bus drivers: Trying to make sense out of the numbers?

By Leong Sze Hian   I refer to the article “SMRT bus drivers…

COVID-19: MOH investigating and identifying 95 Singaporeans who attended religious event in Malaysia

In a Facebook post on Thursday (12 March), Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affair…

Concluding report of the Hougang by-elections

~ By Howard Lee ~ This article is, first and foremost, a salute to…