Davinder Singh Chambers (DSC), the law firm representing Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in his defamation suit against veteran blogger Leong Sze Hian, has sent a statement on 14 March (Thursday) requesting Mr Leong to pay a total of S$21,000 for two summonses.

“As you know, on 12 March 2019, the Honourable Justice Aedit Abdullah allowed SUM 148 and dismissed SUM 428 and on 13 March 2019. His Honour ordered your client to pay out client costs of $6,000 (all in) in respect of SUM 148 and $15,000 (all in) in respect of SUM 428,” said the statement addressed to Lim Tean, who is the lawyer representing Mr Leong.

It is also written that the cheque of S$21,000 should be given to DSC no later than 5pm on 21 March 2019.

Last week, Justice Aedit Abdullah released his judgement and said that the Singapore High Court has struck out the blogger’s counterclaim against PM Lee’s defamation suit, citing Mr Leong’s failure to disclose a “reasonable cause of action” in his counterclaim.

The entire defamation case first started in November 2018 when PM Lee sued the blogger for sharing a link of an article that had been published by The Coverage on his Facebook page, without comment or amendment. The article claimed that editor-in-chief of investigative journalism platform Sarawak Report Ms Clare Rewcastle had mentioned Singapore as “one of the key investigation targets, alongside Switzerland and United States” in the 1MDB corruption scandal during an interview with Malaysian media.

Following this, Mr Leong filed a countersuit against PM Lee for the abuse of the process of the Court.

After Mr Leong filed the counterclaim, PM Lee’s lawyers made an application to strike out the counterclaim “on the ground that it has no basis in law and is completely hopeless”. In response, the veteran blogger then filed an application to strike out PM Lee’s claim for abuse of process of the court and the hearing for both their applications were heard on Monday (25 February).

As such, after hearing counsel from both sides, Justice Aedit released a judgement that strikes out the blogger’s counterclaim against PM Lee.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

淡马亚:医疗基本人权,反对私营化

民主党主席淡马亚医生,冀望投身有鲜明意识形态的政党,而民主党(SDP)的中间偏左路线,与他对基本人权如居住权、医疗和基础教育的观点相符。 他在2010年开始活跃于民主党,于2011年曾为该党竞选活动站台。但直到2015年,才作为候选人之一在荷兰-武吉知马集选区上阵,他主打的主要议题之一,就是医疗融资。 他坚称终身护保仍有改善空间,“医疗是基本人权,而不是施舍,医疗私营化是一个错误,”大众应享有可负担的医疗服务”。 在1960年,世界卫生组织派代表考察新加坡的医疗体系,时任卫生部长阿末伊布拉欣(Ahmad Ibrahim)说狮城拥有完善医疗体制,提供民众近乎免费的医疗服务。看门诊(OPD)只需1新元,住院也大概5新元。”这种状态一直维持到80年代中期。 淡马亚说,在1983年出台的新加坡医疗蓝皮书,显示新加坡的婴孩夭折率甚至低于英美两国。我国确实曾以低廉价格提供民众一流的医保服务,证明可负担医疗福利是可行的。 “或许你想住进私立医院,但前提是,只要政府作为公共医疗唯一经营者,你不需担心因癌症或心脏绕道手术承担高昂费用。” 他补充,这不意味着政府一手包办,因为这可能导致体系过于臃肿而缺乏效率。不妨参考澳洲、法国和德国,政府不必然承办服务,而是背后出资人。 他放眼打造免赔额和保户自付额都较低廉的基础医疗服务。淡马亚认为,没有证据显示,只因为医疗服务免费或可索赔保险,病患就会刻意接受无必要的治疗,大部分人对常常看医生和吃药可不感兴趣,所以政府过度赔偿的问题不应存在。 商业化鼓励过度消费医疗资源 “一般民众对医疗的认识有限,仰赖他们的医生和保险公司建议最好的疗程,造成信息不对称现象。” 他分析,促成狮城医保成本上涨的因素很多,最重要的就是商业化,医疗机构必须赚钱,确保投资股东能获得回酬,结果造成市场扭曲,过度消费医疗服务资源反而被奖励。…

Arthur, the stray dog who joined a race team and refused to be left behind

Meet Arthur the stray dog who followed an extreme sports team during…

Mustafa Centre investigated for alleged violation of Employment of Foreign Manpower Act

The Online Citizen understands that complaints have been made against the renowned…

Deconstructing democracy and freedom of speech

~ By Ghui ~ With the possibility of a by-election looming and…