Davinder Singh Chambers (DSC), the law firm representing Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in his defamation suit against veteran blogger Leong Sze Hian, has sent a statement on 14 March (Thursday) requesting Mr Leong to pay a total of S$21,000 for two summonses.

“As you know, on 12 March 2019, the Honourable Justice Aedit Abdullah allowed SUM 148 and dismissed SUM 428 and on 13 March 2019. His Honour ordered your client to pay out client costs of $6,000 (all in) in respect of SUM 148 and $15,000 (all in) in respect of SUM 428,” said the statement addressed to Lim Tean, who is the lawyer representing Mr Leong.

It is also written that the cheque of S$21,000 should be given to DSC no later than 5pm on 21 March 2019.

Last week, Justice Aedit Abdullah released his judgement and said that the Singapore High Court has struck out the blogger’s counterclaim against PM Lee’s defamation suit, citing Mr Leong’s failure to disclose a “reasonable cause of action” in his counterclaim.

The entire defamation case first started in November 2018 when PM Lee sued the blogger for sharing a link of an article that had been published by The Coverage on his Facebook page, without comment or amendment. The article claimed that editor-in-chief of investigative journalism platform Sarawak Report Ms Clare Rewcastle had mentioned Singapore as “one of the key investigation targets, alongside Switzerland and United States” in the 1MDB corruption scandal during an interview with Malaysian media.

Following this, Mr Leong filed a countersuit against PM Lee for the abuse of the process of the Court.

After Mr Leong filed the counterclaim, PM Lee’s lawyers made an application to strike out the counterclaim “on the ground that it has no basis in law and is completely hopeless”. In response, the veteran blogger then filed an application to strike out PM Lee’s claim for abuse of process of the court and the hearing for both their applications were heard on Monday (25 February).

As such, after hearing counsel from both sides, Justice Aedit released a judgement that strikes out the blogger’s counterclaim against PM Lee.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

CPF Board denies husband’s request to use his CPF savings from his Ordinary and Special accounts for his wife’s medical treatment

The CPF Board has rejected a 47-year-old man named Suriia Das’s request…

What does the U.S. Federal Reserve’s coronavirus rate cut mean for you?

by ValueChampion In an effort to stem the economic and financial impacts of…

金管局:网传不实消息 对为狮城贡献外籍人士不公平

新加坡金融管理局强调,散播有关金融机构招聘做法的不实消息,并没有好处,也对那些来本地工作、为狮城作出贡献的外籍人士不公平。 在疫情冲击下,国人担忧裁员、对本地就业前景的忧虑浮现,加上本月初人力部揭发,人力部揭发47雇主招聘员工未公平对待新加坡人,坊间对于建设新加坡专才核心劳动力的呼声更高。 然而,金管局回应《海峡时报》时却指出,网络社交媒体上的一些说法是不实的!也对特定背景的雇员产生猜忌。 金管局强调,国人提起金融领域中国人就业的问题,当局都有聆听,然而部分人士散播假消息,无助人们进行知情讨论,更何况这些说法,对于相关金融机构,以及那些为新加坡贡献的外籍人士都是不公平的。 其中一则贴文分享照片,声称是在新加坡的星展银行办公处,一群非新加坡雇员和该银行总裁高博德(Piyush Gupta)合摄;以及另一张照片声称在樟宜商业园的星展银行信息科技部门。 惟星展银行早前解释,实则第一张照片,是在2017年9月,是星展银行在印度孟买开设办公处的合照;第二张也是年前在印度的海得拉巴(Hyderabad)的合照。 金管局解释,整体而言,在金融领域国人的就业情况相当正面,金融领域10份职业中有七人都是新加坡人担纲。 该局也持续与金融机构合作,培养强大的新加坡核心劳动力,只是目前需要做得更多,为日国人创造更多就业机会。 金管局需回应退休银行家的言论 然而,早前就已有一位退休银行家揭露一些大型、老牌外籍银行,倾向雇用外籍人士、排挤新加坡人才,“已是业界熟知之事”,并呼吁当局应严密审查金融领域的这种现象。 尽管金管局局长孟文能认真看待,惟他也透露,在银行领域方面,43巴仙高管都是本地人。这是否意味着,另外57巴仙高管都是外籍人士?…