Singapore Business Review (SBR) published an article last Mon (‘Singapore’s foreign workers left in limbo amidst tighter manpower rules‘, 4 Mar) highlighting that foreigners working in Singapore are “left in limbo” after the recent announcement by the Singapore government to cut work pass quota.

During the recent budget debate, Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat announced a cut in the foreign worker quota in the services sector, after noting that growth in S-pass services holders hit a five-year high last year.

“The foreign workers in Singapore’s services sector face heightened risk of losing their jobs after finance minister Heng Swee Keat announced in his budget address that the government will be reducing the dependency ratio ceiling (DRC) for the services sector from the current 40% to 38% by January 1, 2020 and to 35% in January 1, 2021,” SBR wrote.

“The S Pass sub-DRC for the services sector has also been tightened from the current 15% to 13% on Jan 1, 2020, and to 10% from Jan 1, 2021.”

The Singapore government is also actively promoting the use of technologies in industries so that companies would depend less on foreign manpower. In the meantime, technologies would help boost productivity.

Filipino on S-Pass: We are humans who have families to support

SBR interviewed one of the foreign workers on S-Pass, Jean, who came to Singapore ten years ago and now “works at a popular supermarket chain to support her family in the Philippines”.

“I heard that they were cutting down the number of foreign workers. Of course, we’re worried because there is a possibility that we could get cut. We worry constantly because they have been tightening since 2008,” she spoke to SBR in Filipino in an interview.

There are an estimated 180,000 Filipinos working in Singapore currently.

SBR said that foreign workers like Jean lose out as they remain in limbo about how longer they can still stay and work in Singapore.

Jean told SBR she hopes that the Singapore government would start to value the contributions of foreign workers like herself to Singapore’s prosperity, after she applied for PR twice and was rejected on both counts.

“I am very grateful to Singapore as the host country but I hope that they will do more for the foreign workers who help build Singapore,” she said.

“We are not just workers but we are humans who have families to support. What will become of us after the host country cuts our jobs after we have served for 10 to 20 years? We can go home to the Philippines, but then who will hire us when we are already in our late 30s and 40s?”

It’s strange that Jean is asking the Singapore government for help to get jobs instead of her own Philippines government.

Singapore PMET: Hiring companies not helping locals

Meanwhile, in an interview with Transitioning.org, a support site for the unemployed Singaporeans, a 38-year-old PMET local named Philip who recently lost his job as Deputy Contact Centre Manager felt that companies are not doing enough to hire locals.

“I have a couple of interviews since Dec 2018 and also Jan 2019. As there were many people looking for similar roles, companies have more choices to choose from, therefore chances of being reemployed is lower,” he said.

“Companies are not willing to pay for a local with the same amount of experience as a foreign talent. I do understand that fresh grads are targeting to have a starting salary of $3000 and above without relevant experience, whereas they can get a FT with more experience at the same package.”

“It is the hiring companies that’s not helping local Singaporeans,” he said, adding that living expenses have gone up but salary hasn’t.

“I do feel that this (foreign influx) needs to be controlled. Singaporean PMETs need to be given a chance to learn and climb the corporate ladder.”

It’s a common knowledge that if a company has a foreigner in-charge of HR, he or she would tend to favor their “own kind”.

And in the case of Employment Passes, there is no quota for companies and there have been cases where companies overstate the pay for the workers in order for them to qualify for EP.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

涉假冒中国政府官员 警今年接获逾400宗诈骗案

警方数据显示,警方自今年初至11月,一共接获401宗涉及假冒中国政府官员的诈骗案件,导致受害人损失了至少1880万新元。 仅仅下半年8月至11月就占了242宗案件,涉案款项高达1080万新元。 警方于上周五(13日)指出,类似案件在今年下半年剧增,而在今年1月至5月期间,警方也接获多达92起类似诈骗案件的投报。 当局指出,骗子通常会假冒快递公司、电信服务供应商或政府官员的职员,对受害者行骗。 他们的套路多数是:指受害者所注册的手机号码涉及罪案、或他们扣查了注明受害者为收货人士,装有非法物品的包裹、或有针对受害者的法庭案件、又或者指受害者涉及刑事案件,需要协助调查。 然后,骗子就会以为了方便调查,要求受害者提供网上银行户口的个人资料,以及一次性密码(OTP)。 甚至在一些情况下,他们还会将有关电话转接给另一名自称是“中国保安(或警察)”的人士。 骗子会向受害者展示“中国保安”所持有的逮捕令副本,并威胁受害者,若不配合调查将会有牢狱之灾。 受害者在提供了有关个资后,不久就会发现他们银行账户内的资金,已经被转账到未知账户了。 有的骗子会采用另外一种方式,即让受害者扫描一个二维码(QR Code),然后使用比特币自动贩卖机转移款项。 在某些情况下,受害者会被要求自银行账户中提款,然后转交给假政府官员,已进行审核。…

针对夫申请转移公积金医罹癌妻 公积金局公开回应

日前本社报导,一名印裔公民,为了能治好妻子的病,向中央公积金局申请,将自己的普通和特别户头存款,转移到妻子的保健储蓄(medisave)户头,好让妻子能继续抗癌。但是,公积金局拒绝了苏利亚的要求。 人权律师拉维于10日在脸书更新近况,表示他的律师团队已经入禀高庭,以申请强制令要求公积金局,准许他领取积蓄籍转移给妻子莎若吉妮户头,作抗癌医疗费用。 不过,公积金局与卫生部于今日(7月12日)发表联合文告,尝试厘清莎若吉妮个案中的一些细节,并解释莎若吉妮的终身健保、个人保险等已为她承担大部分医疗费,且公积金局自2017年以来,已尝试透过各种配套施予援手。 必须注意的是,目前苏利亚提出的诉求,是希望当局能批准他提出自己的公积金普通和特别户头,转移到妻子户口作为治疗费用。惟在文告中当局除了对夫妇俩处境深表遗憾,但未提及条例下55岁才能转移至亲户口的限制,以及是否特别通融现年47岁的苏利亚这么做,拯救爱妻。 在文告中,公积金局解释,自2017年,患有卵巢癌的莎若吉妮,选择在伊丽莎白私人医院和百汇癌症中心(PCC)寻求治疗。百汇癌症中心告知莎若吉妮夫妇,她的癌况近末期已无法治愈。 2018年,她前往国立大学医院咨询第二意见,而她得到的答案亦同。文告解释,国大医院献议莎若吉妮可预约转介到该医院接受津贴治疗。 “莎若吉妮选择继续在私立、无津贴的百汇癌症中心接受治疗, 她的终身健保到目前为止为她支付六万元医疗和住院费用。而加上她的私人保险,保险至今为她支付了30万元,涵盖了她在百汇和伊丽莎白医院90巴仙的医疗费。” 公积金局续解释莎若吉妮获得的保障,指自2017年10月,莎若吉妮可从乐龄健保每月领取1100元,至今累积2万3000元,得以为他们减轻财务负担。 “莎若吉妮和丈夫苏利亚也从他们的健保储蓄中,领取9000元供治疗用途。” 公积金局称,2017年,鉴于百汇癌症中心的评估指莎若吉妮病情严重,她获准从公积金普通和特别户头领取2万5000元。 至于公积金局家庭保障计划( Home…

ICA officer charged for receiving bribe to speed up PR application of a Malaysian

On Thursday (10 October), an Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) customer service…

Concerned about procedures for reporting food poisoning cases

NEA should provide public a better avenue to report such cases. Gerald Giam.