The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) was among the “relevant parties” consulted by the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) prior to approving the licence for Watain’s concert, the Authority said in a statement on Tue (12 Mar).

The statement was made following several letters published on The Straits Times‘ Forum, which criticised the last-minute cancellation of the Swedish band’s concert in Singapore on Thu (7 Mar), namely “IMDA’s initial green light for band baffling“, “Why didn’t IMDA check with MHA regarding concert?“, and “Tighten concert approval process“.

IMDA’s statement read: “IMDA had consulted relevant parties including the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) before classifying the Watain concert.

“Given the band’s history and concerns expressed by MHA, IMDA allowed the Watain concert with a rating of “Restricted 18 (R18),” said the Authority.

However, on the same day the concert was scheduled to take place, IMDA revealed that MHA had asked IMDA to “consider cancelling the Watain concert due to new and serious concerns about public order, and ground reactions relating to social and religious harmony”.

“After careful consideration, IMDA agreed to do it,” said the Authority.

Touching on the grounds behind the initial approval granted upon Watain to hold their concert in Singapore, IMDA said that it has “imposed stringent requirements, including the removal of songs which are religiously offensive, that the band could not make references to religion or use religious symbols, and that no ritualistic acts were to be performed on stage”.

Such requirements, said the Authority, are “consistent with IMDA’s treatment of similar performances in the past”.

“In assessing and classifying content for arts performances and concerts, IMDA aims to protect the young from unsuitable content, maintain community norms and values, and safeguard public interest, while enabling adults to make informed choices,” IMDA added.

In its earlier statement on Thursday, IMDA said: “Watain is known for its Satanist views and some of their previous controversial performances involved animal carcasses and throwing pig’s blood on its audience.

“The band also espouses anti-Christian views and advocates Satanism through their songs, and endorses violence.

“MHA has therefore asked IMDA to consider cancelling the concert for reasons of public order, and IMDA has agreed,” the Authority concluded.

Govt decision to cancel concert part of “self-righteous attempts to govern other people’s lives and decisions, as if all our supporters in Singapore were incapable of deciding for themselves”: Watain frontman

Responding to the sudden cancellation, Watain frontman Erik Danielsson told AFP: “We have been touring around the world for nearly 20 years and believe it or not, never have we encountered such old-fashioned retardation,” adding that the decision was a part of “self-righteous attempts to govern other people’s lives and decisions, as if all our supporters in Singapore were incapable of deciding for themselves”.

The band had strongly condemned the Government’s abrupt decision to cancel their concert in its Facebook post on Thursday.

Watain, in their post, had sent a “proud hail” to their fans and followers from all over South-east Asia who had travelled to Singapore for the concert, but who were instead “robbed of their experience in the last minute by Singapore’s tragic excuse for a government”.

They added that they looked forward to the day when they can perform for their fans without the “interference from lesser men”.

Watain had also left a message to what they have labelled “the honorless rats behind the ban”, stating: “[…] rest assured that you in your cowardly act have only stirred the cauldrons of your own misfortune”.

“If these men and women didn’t already feel mistrust and contempt towards ”authorities”, they sure do now,” warned the heavy metal band.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

GES 2013: 100% employment for law graduates, less than 60% for some

By Singapore Rat Race Graduate Employment Survey (GES) results were released by MOE…

唐振辉伦敦“审问”脸书高层 质疑脸书监管平台内容不力

我国律政部兼卫生部高级政务部长唐振辉,出席于伦敦举行的国际假新闻及假消息委员会听证大会。会上他对脸书表达质疑,是否能相信脸书对于平台上出现的仇恨、争议性内容,能作出正确的评估和判断。 他在会上质问脸书公司政策解决方案副总监查德-艾伦,脸书是否禁止用户在网络上攻击他人、宗教、种族和散播仇恨情绪,如有发现,脸书是否会及时移除? 他举例,在今年三月斯里兰卡出现的一则脸书贴文引起争议,帖文称要”杀死所有穆斯林,连婴儿也不放过“。唐振辉说,这已是很明显的仇恨贴文。 有关贴文最终引起斯里兰卡陷入佛教徒和穆斯林爆发冲突、清真寺被攻击,致使政府被迫宣布戒严。连该国时任通讯部长费南多也曾质问,为何脸书拒绝拿下该贴文。 艾伦尝试解释,该贴文理应当时就被移除,不过唐振辉则追问,当时用户在投诉后还有收到反馈,所以脸书是确实收到投诉的,而且还回应有关贴文”未违反脸书社群守则“。 艾伦:”这绝对是失误,确实有人做错了…“ 唐振辉:”艾伦先生,我想这是很严重的失误,你承认吗?“ 艾伦:”是的,我承认。“ 唐振辉:”这违反了脸书会马上移除(仇恨贴文)的政策,这是否显示我们不能相信脸书,对于平台上的内容,有能力作出正确的评估判断?“ 艾伦:”不…. 我们出现失误“唐振辉:”是严重的失误“,艾伦:对,严重的失误,但我们必须减少这些失误,我们投资在人工智能,拓展仇恨字眼词典,以侦测平台上发文者和留言者发布的仇恨内容。” 唐振辉:是否等政府封锁脸书?…

前人协总执行理事长、曾赴俄任外交官 林鼎父亲林靖忠病逝享年84岁

在野党人民之声领袖林鼎律师的父亲、也是人民协会前总执行理事长林靖忠,在本月21日下午因病逝世,享年84岁。 据林鼎告知《联合早报》,他的父亲是在上周二(16日)因跌倒入院,不过当时仍意识清醒、身体状况良好。惟临出院时却突感不适,疑器官受感染,最后因肺炎于医院去世。 林靖忠是南洋大学毕业生,曾服务公共部门20载,1961年加入政府部门,曾在不同单位担任行政官,还曾与建国总理李光耀,以及前副总理吴庆瑞博士等人共事。 林靖忠后来还获选赴俄修读俄文;1971年受委出任我国驻苏联大使馆的一等秘书,并在1973年升任领事。全家在莫斯科生活有约四五年的时间。 返国后,任职任文化部副秘书与人协外勤理事长;1978年接任人协总执行理事长。他在1982年卸下人协职务,转向商界发展。 林鼎坦言,自己对政治的兴趣,来自父亲的影响很大。在俄罗斯生活期间,尽管当时还上小学,但父亲时常在饭桌上讨论时事课题,也引起林鼎的兴趣。美国前总统尼克森、中国前总理周恩来、前苏联领袖勃列日涅夫等,自小林鼎就非常熟悉。 林鼎称父亲林靖忠“做事勤奋、用心。他思想也非常开明,他一直相信政治需要适应时代需求,因此也没有阻止我加入反对党。” 现任人协总执行长和全体人协成员,也献上花圈吊唁。林靖忠的灵堂设于新加坡殡仪馆,遗体将于24日在万礼火化场火化。

A letter from Jack

By Jack Sim – The following is a letter from Jack Sim…